LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter



Tax deductible

The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.
In the United States, your donations are tax deductible.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » General Support » IDSA Letter To Federal TBD Working Group

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: IDSA Letter To Federal TBD Working Group
Tincup
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 5829

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Tincup         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
One example...

QUOTE- “… we are extremely concerned that the non-evidenced based approach favored by the Working Group has produced a report containing irresponsible recommendations that run counter to quality scientific and clinical information. If implemented, these would cause significant harm to patients and public health."

https://sites.google.com/site/marylandlyme/idsa-panel-review/idsa-letter-to-federal-tbd-working-group--november-2018

[ 11-28-2018, 07:34 PM: Message edited by: Tincup ]

--------------------
www.TreatTheBite.com
www.DrJonesKids.org
www.MarylandLyme.org
www.LymeDoc.org

Posts: 20037 | From The Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robin123
Moderator
Member # 9197

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Robin123     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Wow - they really don't like this working group.

How can they show that treatments they don't know anything about harm patients?

Posts: 12545 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tincup
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 5829

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Tincup         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Don't know? Sorry!

--------------------
www.TreatTheBite.com
www.DrJonesKids.org
www.MarylandLyme.org
www.LymeDoc.org

Posts: 20037 | From The Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Keebler
Honored Contributor (25K+ posts)
Member # 12673

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Keebler         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
-
https://www.lymedisease.org/lyme-working-group-mervine/

Who gets to decide what constitutes scientific evidence for chronic Lyme?

Verbal Comments to the Tick-borne Diseases Working Group, December 3, 2018

by Phyllis Mervine - December 7, 2018

. . . [I'm] Founder and President of the patient advocacy nonprofit LymeDisease.org.

I’m going to focus on the November 26 letter sent by the Infectious Diseases Society of America or IDSA to the Working Group.

In their letter, the IDSA accuses the Working Group of attempting “to stifle the voices of physicians who use sound, evidence-based science to direct care for their patients.”

Not evidence-based? Says who?

They say: “We are extremely concerned that the non-evidenced based approach favored by the Working Group.”

I’d like to ask, who decided the IDSA is the sole arbiter of what constitutes evidence?

IDSA conveniently ignores the evidence that chronic Lyme disease exists, and doesn’t treat it, so how could they be experts?

If someone presents evidence that doesn’t fit with their theories, they say it’s not “convincing.”

Their Lyme guidelines are more than 10 years old and were removed from the National Guidelines Clearinghouse website almost three years ago because they were out of date.

The IDSA has no grounds for attacking the Working Group.

The last time the IDSA published new Lyme guidelines was in 2006. They were almost immediately called out by the Connecticut Attorney General for commercial conflicts of interest and suppression of scientific evidence.

“Independent”? Says who?

When the terms of their settlement with the AG required them to convene a review panel, IDSA called it “independent,” but the panel members were actually all members of IDSA and by definition not independent.

Later, the Institute of Medicine used the IDSA Lyme guidelines as a poster child of how not to create guidelines.

The International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society’s 2014 guidelines were the first Lyme guidelines to meet the stringent standards of the Institute of Medicine for trustworthy guidelines.

They are evidence-based and done by the GRADE system and were listed on the National Guidelines Clearinghouse website until its demise earlier this year. They take a very different view of the evidence than the IDSA.

The problem is that the IDSA’s narrow views and refusal to accept new evidence makes it difficult for them to see that someone else might have better answers than they do.

Unfounded claims

Their claim that the Working Group is biased against scientific evidence is unfounded.

The Working Group brought together well-qualified scientists from every field, including several federal employees from the Vector-Borne Division of the CDC.

The doctors in the Working Group have experience treating thousands of patients at all stages of Lyme disease.

LymeDisease.org’s big data project, MyLymeData, may give us more insight about responders and non-responders to various treatments.

I am hoping that among them the Working Group will come up with some answers that the IDSA has failed to provide through their restrictive approach.

Phyllis Mervine founded the organization now known as LymeDisease.org in 1989.

www.lymedisease.org
-

Posts: 47264 | From Tranquil Tree House in my dreams | Registered: Jul 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
OptiMisTick
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 399

Icon 1 posted      Profile for OptiMisTick     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Pherocious Phyllis.

You are Phabulous!

A Great Phriend to the Lyme Community!

Posts: 1328 | From Above the Clouds | Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

© 1993-2017 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to the Terms and Conditions.

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


Home | Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Webmaster