LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » General Support » New York Times Op-Ed: Don’t Homogenize Health Care

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: New York Times Op-Ed: Don’t Homogenize Health Care
KarlaL
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 29631

Icon 1 posted      Profile for KarlaL     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
A refreshing opinion piece in the New York Times about the importance about being honest about the strength of the scientific evidence and giving weight to patient preferences in making treatment decisions. These concepts are central to the recently published International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society, Lyme Disease Treatment Guidelines.

This article is also a great place to make comments about the current state of Lyme disease treatment in the US.

KarlaL

The Opinion Pages | OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

Don’t Homogenize Health Care
By SANDEEP JAUHARDEC. 10, 2014

For the complete opinion piece, go to:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/11/opinion/dont-homogenize-health-care.html?ref=opinion&_r=1

IN American medicine today, "variation" has become a dirty word. Variation in the treatment of a medical condition is associated with wastefulness, lack of evidence and even capricious care. To minimize variation, insurers and medical specialty societies have banded together to produce a dizzying array of treatment guidelines for everything from asthma to diabetes, from urinary incontinence to gout.

At some level, this makes sense. Some types of variation are unwarranted, even deadly. For example, we know that ACE inhibitor drugs improve quality of life and survival in heart-failure patients, but only two-thirds of American physicians prescribe these drugs to such patients. A study by the National Committee for Quality Assurance, a nonprofit organization focused on health care, reported that 57,000 Americans die each year because the care they get is not based on the best available evidence.

But the effort to homogenize health care presumes that we always know which treatments are best and should be applied uniformly. Unfortunately, this is not the case. The evidence for most treatments in medicine remains weak. In the absence of good evidence recommending one treatment over another, trying to stamp out variation in care is irrational. . . .

For the complete opinion piece, go to:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/11/opinion/dont-homogenize-health-care.html?ref=opinion&_r=1

--------------------
KarlaL

Posts: 694 | From New Lebanon, NY | Registered: Dec 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Keebler
Honored Contributor (25K+ posts)
Member # 12673

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Keebler     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
-
Karla,

Thanks for posting this (and so many of the other good things you post, too).

Yesterday, I saw this and hoped someone else would have the energy to pass it along. Glad you did.

Chilling questions, unsettling scenarios are certainly developing due to this "standardization" and cook-book / recipe manner of medical care. Ugh. Glad to see at least one doctor speak up.

Still, his essay examples were rather simplistic (maybe to save space) compared to the kinds of leeway required when treating the kinds of things ticks bring.

I think doctors may not being to comprehend the scope of what's really going on or what's really required for optimal patient care. Certainly those writing guidelines have no clue to the complexities. Nor care.
-

Posts: 48021 | From Tree House | Registered: Jul 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.