LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Activism » response to article full of misinformation??

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: response to article full of misinformation??
paleogal
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 45991

Icon 1 posted      Profile for paleogal     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Check out this article:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/08/08/lyme-disease_n_7696824.html

Some gems:
"1. You can only get Lyme disease from a tick bite."

"4. In most cases, it takes 36 to 48 hours for an infected tick to transmit Lyme disease after it attaches itself to you."

"6. The most common symptom of Lyme disease is a bullseye rash."

"7. Lyme disease is officially diagnosed with a blood test."

At first I thought this was an article on myths about Lyme disease, but alas no....

What should be the typical response to articles filled with misinformation, like this one? Can we produce something formal rather than adding comments?

Posts: 243 | From Southern Arizona | Registered: Jun 2015  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tincup
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 5829

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Tincup         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I shouldn't be laughing, sorry! Had to go look up who was involved with this incredibly stupid and inaccurate article- and sure enough- one of the people behind it is none other than...

Phillip J. Baker, executive director of the American Lyme Disease Foundation.

To be honest, I wouldn't worry about it. You certainly can dispute it, but in my opinion it might just be a waste of your time. ??

First, the author won't change it. And second, it is possible, not positive, this same author has done or will do other pieces for dim wit Baker and the gang and there is an agenda of sorts.

Third, it is what the CDC states as fact, so the author and editor will stick to it, wrong or not.

Fourth, the Huffington Post does a good number of Lyme related articles (some by patients), mostly good ones, so we, as a community, can probably take a little hit now and then.
Kicking their butts may turn them off to all Lyme articles.

Fifth, most chronic Lyme patients are familiar with Baker and his trash, including doctors treating Lyme patients, and nearly all, if not all, don't pay any attention to his blubbering.

And, Phil Baker's day is coming, soon.

IF you still would like to respond, if I remember right the group, name?, that did the MayDay project, has a nice write up with references to counter the bad junk that you can use to compose your response. I believe I saw it- a long while back- on their website.

In my opinion, the better way to handle this situation is to find someone to put their story in their local paper. Every time we do that more people understand Lyme and we get the word out there. It is something people can relate to.

Just my suggestions.

--------------------
www.TreatTheBite.com
www.DrJonesKids.org
www.MarylandLyme.org
www.LymeDoc.org

Posts: 20353 | From The Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tincup
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 5829

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Tincup         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Oh, and by the way, I do think comments posted at the site help. They are right there and in your face when you read the trash stuff. I've seen the media pull an article a number of times because of too many responses countering what they said.

--------------------
www.TreatTheBite.com
www.DrJonesKids.org
www.MarylandLyme.org
www.LymeDoc.org

Posts: 20353 | From The Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.