lyme in Putnam
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 11561
posted
Last year tested low positive Lyme, Jan, neg Bart hensalae, negative Bart Quintana, march same thing. 6 mos of Iv in June, igg was positive for both strains. My llmd thought that the 6 mos of Iv brought it out. Does this sound reasonable?
-------------------- He took u to it, He'll you through Posts: 2837 | From NE. | Registered: Apr 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
It's possible. Both Bartonella strains went positive on me after about 6 months of Doxy (and 1 week of Bactrim).
Posts: 584 | From NY | Registered: Feb 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
I have heard of this happening many times. The abx could break up the cyst forms and biofilms where the Lyme was hiding, bringing it out and causing it to be more detectable to testing.
I have even heard of those who tested negative being instructed to re-test after abx, although I was positive from the start. Reasonable? Yes.
-------------------- Best Wishes,
Hope
"Hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things, and no good thing ever dies."
~~The Shawshank Redemption~~ Posts: 234 | From Minnesota | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged |
lyme in Putnam
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 11561
posted
Would the igg means it shows you were exposed or it came out? Why wouldn't it be IGm if active?
-------------------- He took u to it, He'll you through Posts: 2837 | From NE. | Registered: Apr 2007
| IP: Logged |
Razzle
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 30398
posted
Lyme/coinfections mess with the immune system so much that it is not surprising test results would run contrary to conventional wisdom that says IgM = active infection, IgG = old/past infection.
Also, if they happened to miss the IgM because it happened between tests, it would only show up as IgG (according to the traditional view of how antibodies work)...
-------------------- -Razzle Lyme IgM IGeneX Pos. 18+++, 23-25+, 30++, 31+, 34++, 39 IND, 83-93 IND; IgG IGeneX Neg. 30+, 39 IND; Mayo/CDC Pos. IgM 23+, 39+; IgG Mayo/CDC Neg. band 41+; Bart. (clinical dx; Fry Labs neg. for all coinfections), sx >30 yrs. Posts: 4166 | From WA | Registered: Feb 2011
| IP: Logged |
posted
One weird thing I noticed on my Bartonella tests were that my heneselae IgG came back 1:256 and next to that it stated it was a recent infection, while my IgM was still normal.
IgG can mean a current or past infection. Increased levels between testing suggest an active infection. So I'm not sure if IgM is needed in this case to show it's active.
Posts: 584 | From NY | Registered: Feb 2009
| IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/