LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Shocked by test results: old versus new infection?

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Shocked by test results: old versus new infection?
Geneal
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 10375

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Geneal     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi all.

Last time I was tested for Lyme was through Quest

back in 2007..only band positive was IgM 23..enough

to get me a diagnosis, find this site and have Lyme

Tutu help me find a LLMD (forever thankful!)

Started feeling....well....Lymie again in April.

Tried to convince myself it is anything but Lyme.

Finally gave in...called LLMD and made my first

appointment in 6 years. Just got back my WB from

LabCorp today..(LLMD said not to spend the money

on Igenex at this time). I am shocked. [Eek!]

I am CDC positive on IgM with bands 41, 23 and 66.

IgG is negative for any bands. Could this be a

new infection? Seems like I would of had more IgG

bands if this was possibly a relapse. Or not. I

am not sure. Not that it matters, but curious to

see what y'all think.

Posts: 6250 | From Louisiana | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TF
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 14183

Icon 1 posted      Profile for TF     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I haven't had lyme for 12 years and I still test CDC positive on the Western Blot. I may retain those lyme antibodies for the rest of my life. It means nothing.

Once you have had lyme, there is no test that can tell you if this is a new infection or if your old infection is still causing the antibodies.

So, docs have to go by symptoms to tell if you have lyme again or not.

My lyme doc believed that a certain new test could differentiate old lyme from new. He talked me into this $500 test which was not covered by my insurance. This was about 6 years ago.

Test result was that I had lyme again. Wrong!! What I had was a severe sinus infection and once I switched ENTs and got cured of the sinus infection in about a month, all of my symptoms went away and never came back.

So, go by symptoms. That is all you can do.

Posts: 9931 | From Maryland | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Geneal
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 10375

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Geneal     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Wow. I had ruled everything else out prior to the

LLMD visit. I guess I thought IgM was recent

infection and IgG was latent. I am working on

getting whole again. [Smile]

Posts: 6250 | From Louisiana | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TF
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 14183

Icon 1 posted      Profile for TF     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Here's what Dr. H. had to say about IgGs recently:

"43:30 When lyme invades the lymph nodes, it destroys the part of the lymph node that makes IgG antibodes. That is why so few lyme patients test positive on the IgG. In a study, only 1 out of 100 lyme patients were CDC positive on the IgG Western Blot. 3600 patients were in the study. Of them, only 36 could get a positive IgG."

So, perhaps you forgot that the normal rules do NOT apply to lyme tests. Here's the reason why!

If you want to see the post where I put this note and many more, it is here:

http://flash.lymenet.org/scripts/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=136070;p=0#000007

If you want, you can watch the video and hear Dr. H. say this. You can go right to the 43 minute 30 second mark or thereabouts and he will make the statement.

Remember, the Western Blot is NOT looking for the lyme bacteria. Rather, it is looking for antibodies to lyme. Once you have lyme, you have antibodies in your blood to lyme for years.

Posts: 9931 | From Maryland | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Geneal
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 10375

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Geneal     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Great info! Thanks. I am feeling better on

antibiotics. I used to know all of this, but...

it seems that I am learning this all over again.

Posts: 6250 | From Louisiana | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
From Dr C's WB explanation:

"Because Borrelia burgdorferi is a chronic persistent infection that may last for decades, you would think patients with chronic symptoms would have positive IgG Western blots.

But actually, more IgM blots are positive in chronic borreliosis than IgG. Every time Borrelia burgdorferi reproduces itself, it may stimulate the immune system to form new IgM antibodies.

Some patients have both IgG and IgM blots positive. But if either the IgG or IgM blot is positive, overall it is a positive result.

Response to antibiotics is the same if either is positive, or both. Some antibodies against the borrelia are given more significance if they are IgG versus IgM, or vice versa."

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96222 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.