LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » General Support » Good news in MN: Lawmakers battle Lyme disease

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Good news in MN: Lawmakers battle Lyme disease
KatePaint
Member
Member # 22524

Icon 1 posted      Profile for KatePaint     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
http://www.presspubs.com/articles/2009/09/29/forest_lake_press/news/doc4ab9402d9d491907066364.txt
Posts: 14 | From OH/MN | Registered: Sep 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
keltyl
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 14050

Icon 1 posted      Profile for keltyl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks for the article! It's always good to read something beneficial for us.
Posts: 847 | From upstateNY | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
liesandmorelies
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 15323

Icon 1 posted      Profile for liesandmorelies     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This is good at least! Thanks for posting.

--------------------
aka: Lyme Warrior

In order to do "real" science, you have to have a "real" conversation with nature.

Well Behaved Women Rarely Make History!

"Just Demand your Rights"

Posts: 869 | From nor - cal | Registered: Apr 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
just don
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 1129

Icon 1 posted      Profile for just don     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
hope they can pass this,,,in behalf of thousands of Minn. lymies that NEED it!!

THEN pass it in every other state in the nation!!(and country in the world)

--------------------
just don

Posts: 4548 | From Middle of midwest | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bettyg
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
NOTE YOU CAN RATE THE ARTICLE & I THINK I SHOW 4-6 COMMENTS THERE TOO!! so go to the link also [Smile] thanks ... betty

copying article here and breaking up for us neuros to read ... betty


Lawmakers battle Lyme disease


Anoka, Washington and Chisago counties are all considered high risk counties for contracting Lyme disease. -

Data courtesy of Dr. Betty Maloney, graphic by Lara Manthei

New bill would protect physicians who prescribe long-term therapy

by Debra Neutkens
Staff Writer

Published:
Tuesday, September 29, 2009 7:01 PM CDT


FOREST LAKE -- Those who suffer chronic, debilitating Lyme disease have only a handful of doctors, maybe three in the state, willing to treat them.

There are probably more, but those physicians are forced to fly under the radar when it comes to aggressive treatment for the tick-bite malady.

Legislation introduced by Sen. John Marty, DFL-Roseville, and Sen. Ray Vandeveer, R-Forest Lake, hopes to change that.

Senate Bill No. 1631 allows a doctor to treat chronic Lyme disease without fear of disciplinary action by the state Board of Medical Practice. T

he legislation is based on a Connecticut law allowing physicians to use their best clinical judgment when treating Lyme disease.

Three states, Connecticut, Rhode Island and California, have passed similar bills to protect physicians.

Marty, who is chair of the Senate health committee, acknowledged a lack of consensus on Lyme treatment in a statement released last month.

Even doctors in other states feel they will face severe repercussions for treating patients, he said after a lawmaker's meeting with state and national Lyme health experts.

One of those experts was Dr. Betty Maloney, a family practice physician from the Forest Lake area who advocates for the Minnesota Lyme Action Support Group.

``It is a principle of medical ethics that patients hear treatment options, including risks and benefits of alternative treatments to make a choice,'' Maloney told The Press.

``Now patients with persistent Lyme disease hear only strategies advanced by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA).

They don't learn the alternatives - longer antibiotic therapy or combinations of antibiotics - to make an informed choice.''

Marty and Vandeveer's bill would make it possible for physicians to prolong administration of antibiotics longer than the recommended 28-day treatment course by removing concerns about medical board interference, noted Maloney.

She attended a July IDSA hearing in Washington, DC, to discuss current guidelines for treating Lyme disease, submitting over 80 pages of research analyses on behalf of the International Lyme & Associated Diseases Society.

The 2006 IDSA guidelines state there is no evidence long-term antibiotics cure chronic Lyme.


The issue is complicated because the disease is complicated, Maloney said.

``I am not trying to promote a particular agenda beyond wanting patients to get the care they need. I want the science to speak.

In some instances, we have lost track of the science and become political on this issue. I'm not sure why it's political, but if the disease is defined in very narrow fashion, insurance companies have the right to deny care.''

A medical ethicist was asked to submit guidelines for selecting review panel members, according to Maloney.


Anyone who made $10,000 related to care and treatment of Lyme patients was omitted from the panel.

``Essentially all physicians who treat Lyme were eliminated,'' Maloney pointed out.

``That was ludicrous. So no one on the panel really understands nuances of treating a Lyme disease patient; who understands the importance of treating co-infecting organisms.

The panel doesn't understand the level of fatigue in Lyme patients and how sick they are. Fatigue like `I can't get out of bed.' Lyme patients aren't working. They have cognitive issues. The spectrum is wide.''

After review of written submissions and hearing transcripts, the IDSA panel is expected to make a decision on whether guidelines need revision by the end of year.

Meanwhile Lyme disease cases are dramatically increasing in Minnesota, which is considered a hot spot for tick-borne illness (see map).

Anoka, Washington and Chisago County are all included on maps of high-risk areas for tickborne disease.

According to Maloney, tick numbers change season to season and by zip code. Pockets of infection have to do with trees, especially oak trees, which attract rodents.

The primary host for the blacklegged, or deer, tick is not deer, but mice.

The first stage of its life cycle, the larvae, becomes infected with the bacteria responsible for Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi, after feeding on diseased mice.

The next stage is the poppy-seed-sized nymph, the stage that causes the most human cases.

Nymphs live in leaf litter under oak trees. Woodpiles are another source of infestation because mice nest there.

Left untreated, Lyme disease can cause a multitude of problems, including paralysis, arthritis, flu-like illness, irregular heartbeat, and loss of ability to concentrate, according to the Minnesota Department of Health.

It can infect any organ, including the brain, heart, joints and nervous system.

It has also been called the ``Great Imitator'' because it can look like other diseases.

Many sufferers have been misdiagnosed with conditions such as fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue. If the brain is infected, the misdiagnosis might be MS, ALS or Parkinson's.


If the Marty/Vandeveer legislation passes, will doctors who treat Lyme be confident they won't be investigated?

``Employers might still mandate how physicians treat Lyme, but it is one more obstacle to access removed,'' replied Maloney.

``I want physicians and patients to go back to relationships. The bill helps that. It allows physicians to more fully enter into a relationship with Lyme patients.''

Editor's Note:

Dr. Maloney has just published an article on "The Need for Clinical Judgment in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lyme Disease," in the Journal of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, www.jpands.org.
Find it at

http://www.jpands.org/vol14no3/maloney.pdf.

Copyright � 2009 Press Publications

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bettyg
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
i left my feedback ....and it has 4 stars out of 16 folks rating it; you do NOT have to sign up to rate it!!


Debra, outstanding article you wrote above; we thank you for this.

One correction on other states; NEW YORK is protected also since June 15, 2005, The link confirming this is below.

http://www.lymediseaseassociation.org/VictoryInNY.html

We're anxious for 12-31-09 when the newest IDSA panel is to make a decision on 2006 IDSA lyme guidelines on their NOT considering all ILADS info given to them earlier which was excluded from the FINAL 2006 IDSA LYME GUIDELINES.

Again, thank you for a well-written and accurate lyme article!

BEST WISHES MINN. LYME PATIENTS! [Smile]

BettyG, Iowa lyme activist

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.