LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » CDC on the bandwagon- or sinking (stinking) ship

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: CDC on the bandwagon- or sinking (stinking) ship
Tincup
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 5829

Icon 13 posted      Profile for Tincup         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Not long ago I shared this info....

*Special Note- More reflective and informative than CDC map of human cases. Reported Dog Cases of Lyme Disease- USA & Canada (by State and County)

http://www.dogsandticks.com/NA-map-lyme-disease-dogs/index.html

```````````````````````````````````````
Funny how the CDC suddenly decided to review that information and came up with this disclaimer.

Maybe someone should give them some REAL work to do? Or cut them loose?

```````````````````````````````````````````

Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Sep;17(9):1710-2.

Canine serology as adjunct to human lyme disease surveillance.

Mead P, Goel R, Kugeler K.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.

To better define areas of human Lyme disease risk, we compared US surveillance data with published data on the seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies among domestic dogs.

Canine seroprevalence >5% was a sensitive but nonspecific marker of human risk, whereas seroprevalence <1% was associated with minimal risk for human infection.

PMID: 21888800 [PubMed - in process]

--------------------
www.TreatTheBite.com
www.DrJonesKids.org
www.MarylandLyme.org
www.LymeDoc.org

Posts: 20353 | From The Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
James1979
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Were they using data about humans to try to protect the dogs?

I wouldn't be surprised...

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tincup
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 5829

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Tincup         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Not sure what you mean James? My brain isn't getting it tonight. Sorry.

Wanna try again?

--------------------
www.TreatTheBite.com
www.DrJonesKids.org
www.MarylandLyme.org
www.LymeDoc.org

Posts: 20353 | From The Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
James1979
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Oops, I didn't write clearly.

I was satirically trying to say that maybe they were studying humans in order to learn how to protect the dogs.

Now I've killed it. That's okay, it wasn't that funny anyway.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well, I'm even dumber. Not sure I understand their disclaimer.

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 95652 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
t9im
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 25489

Icon 1 posted      Profile for t9im   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I can't see the CDC ever getting on the bandwagon.

They have worked hand in hand with Steere on the over diagnosis and over treatment of Lyme disease starting with Steere's 1993 paper on the subject followed up by his Lyme standard from the Dearborn commission to his subsequent 2000 follow up research report on proving the elisa then WB testing.

A catch 22 sceanario if one ever reads the report.

--------------------
Tim

Posts: 1111 | From Glastonbury, CT | Registered: Apr 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Haley
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 22008

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Haley     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
That was pretty funny James [Wink]
Posts: 2232 | From USA | Registered: Aug 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
finallylyme
Member
Member # 33807

Icon 1 posted      Profile for finallylyme     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
That map was put out by Idexx - the company that makes the heartworm test my veterinary hospital uses. I remember asking a doctor about Lyme and he laughed. When I told him we had 2 positive dogs that year that had never left thier yards (in central ohio), he assured me that humans in Ohio don't get Lyme... If only i remembered which one that was so I could send him my test results.

--------------------
I have Lyme - but it doesn't have me.

Posts: 70 | From ohio | Registered: Sep 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
hammond
Member
Member # 32303

Icon 1 posted      Profile for hammond     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The dog/geography statistics are very interesting, even if it is comically/tragically funny that it takes mucho $dinero$ to compile this "dog" map while thousands of humans are denied abx coverage.

Check out Massachusetts' stats on Lyme. Wow, maybe they have a lot of dog lovers...... but they have high Lyme incidence! Also New York and Penn. are very high. Thanx Tincup!

Posts: 65 | From oregon | Registered: Jun 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.