LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » CDC finally recognizing infections as cause of chronic illness! New paper.

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: CDC finally recognizing infections as cause of chronic illness! New paper.
mycoplasma1
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6377

Icon 1 posted      Profile for mycoplasma1     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
See:

http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol12no07/06-0037.htm

Finally!

Posts: 216 | From Upstate NY | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
mycoplasma1
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6377

Icon 1 posted      Profile for mycoplasma1     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Sorry Cave! Saw you posted this already.
Posts: 216 | From Upstate NY | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lou
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 81

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lou     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I think their definition of chronic may differ from ours. They mean it resists eradication by the immune system alone. We mean that it can resist eradication by antibiotics.

So, we can hope for some enlightenment, but not quite ready to schedule the celebration.

Posts: 8430 | From Not available | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
minimonkey
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8693

Icon 1 posted      Profile for minimonkey     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Still, this *is* progress it seems. Of course, I really question the motives of the CDC, given the history of poo-poo-ing chronic illness as factitious, etc. I wonder why the sudden willingness to disclose this???

Am I just paranoid????

--------------------
"Looks like freedom but it feels like death..
It's something in between, I guess"

Leonard Cohen, from the song "Closing Time"

Posts: 822 | From California | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
David95928
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 3521

Icon 1 posted      Profile for David95928     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Groucho Marx said "Even paranoids can have real enemies."

--------------------
Dave

Posts: 2034 | From CA | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
welcome
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7953

Icon 1 posted      Profile for welcome     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by minimonkey:
Still, this *is* progress it seems. Of course, I really question the motives of the CDC, given the history of poo-poo-ing chronic illness as factitious, etc. I wonder why the sudden willingness to disclose this???

Am I just paranoid????

Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they AREN'T out to get you!

[Big Grin]

Or like I am wont to say, "It's not whether you're paranoid, it's whether you're paranoid enough!"

Posts: 294 | From nevada | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
BugBit
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7829

Icon 1 posted      Profile for BugBit     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well, for one thing, the paragraph about Human Papiloma Virus is completely out of place and context.
To me the article appears to be dis-information on a number of other topics, including the new HPV vaccine. See article below:

You'll love this... note the financial save for the drug company AND the fact that they agreed to promote sexual abstinence as part of the package. It's almost impossible to believe!




FDA panel endorses cervical cancer vaccine

By THOMAS GINSBERG

Philadelphia Inquirer

A vaccine to prevent cervical cancer won endorsement yesterday by a federal medical panel, a key step toward approval for use by millions of girls and young women perhaps by July.

Gardasil, which would be manufactured in the Philadelphia suburbs by Merck & Co. Inc., still needs final approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, but the agency typically takes its panels' advice.

Merck predicted Gardasil would prevent about 350,000 cases yearly of cervical cancer worldwide within two decades, when all girls vaccinated as infants will have entered high-risk adulthood. An estimated 3,700 women in the United States, and 300,000 worldwide, die from cervical cancer in a year.

Gardasil also might help alleviate Merck's own financial ailments from its recall and lawsuits concerning the pain reliever Vioxx and loss of patent-protected sales of the cholesterol drug Zocor. Wall Street analysts have predicted that Gardasil sales will far surpass $1 billion a year by 2010, high for a vaccine.

"I love the world of vaccines," said Rick Haupt, executive director of medical affairs at Merck's vaccine division. "We're in the business of vaccines for now and the future, and this is a very important step."

After a daylong meeting in Gaithersburg, Md., the FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee unanimously recommended Gardasil for use in women and girls ages 9 to 26. Merck has estimated that 374 million people a year eventually could be candidates for the vaccination.

Gardasil is designed to be administered in three low-dose shots over six months. It works by preventing infection from two types of human papillomavirus, or HPV, that have been shown to cause 70 percent of cervical cancers. It is most effective in virgins or females previously unexposed to HPV, an extremely common virus thought to be present in 20 million people in any of its many strains, most of which resolve on their own.

Gardasil also blocks infection by two other HPV types linked primarily to genital warts.

A rival drugmaker, GlaxoSmithKline P.L.C., with U.S. headquarters partly in Philadelphia, is working on its own HPV vaccine targeting a slightly different set of virus types. But its Cervarix is still in development and may not be submitted for FDA approval until next year, the company has said.

Merck promised the FDA reviewers it would market Gardasil with the message that sexual abstinence and Pap smears are the only sure ways to prevent HPV infection and catch cancers. Its marketing campaign might include supporting sexual-abstinence programs, Merck has said.

"This vaccine is not a replacement for cervical-cancer screening," said Eliav Barr, head of Merck's biological clinical research in West Point.

Side effects include fever and occasional soreness at the injection site. Merck reported five instances in which women taking Gardasil later had children with birth defects. But it argued, and FDA reviewers agreed, that there was probably no connection to Gardasil because of the variation in defects and pregnancy periods.

A parade of health advocates - many of them disclosing they had received Merck grants - rose to urge the FDA advisers to endorse Gardasil.

"The FDA has an opportunity to move toward a world without cervical cancer," said Martha Nolan, vice president of the Society for Women's Health Research.

Backed by the groups, Merck asked the committee to endorse vaccination of boys ages 9 to 15, too. Urging them not to wait for studies to end, it said evidence showed that Gardasil could prevent some male cancers and might slow the spread of sexually transmitted HPV.

"By delaying three-plus years, we could have an additional 100,000 [cancer] cases that could have otherwise been avoided," Barr told the committee.

But panel members did not vote on the request, calling the idea compelling but unproven.

If the vaccine is approved by FDA officials, as expected, the next hurdle for Merck would come June 29, when vaccine experts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are scheduled to consider whether to include Gardasil on its list of recommended vaccinations for children in the United States.

State and local officials are not obligated to follow the CDC, but usually do, and sometimes even go further by requiring certain vaccines for school enrollment - a huge boost for drugmakers.

Some groups initially concerned that the HPV vaccines would encourage sexual activity said they supported the vaccine, as long as schools did not require it as a condition of enrollment.

Merck, which has taken great pains to assuage the groups, declined to say whether it thinks Gardasil should be mandatory, but does support mandatory vaccinations in general.

"We are considering all kinds of interventions that could implement this vaccine, and under consideration are ways we can support states to drive implementation," Haupt said.

Wall Street analysts have projected that Gardasil sales could reach $140 million this year, $670 million next year, and $1.9 billion by 2010.

One analyst, Steve Scala of Cowen & Co. L.L.C., cautioned that the Gardasil sales projections might be high, and said GlaxoSmithKline's vaccine still could prove to be better. Nonetheless, Scala called Gardasil a likely blockbuster drug that could provide Merck with a needed boost.

Merck's global headquarters are in Whitehouse Station, N.J., but much of the Gardasil work would be done by Merck's marketing and vaccine operations centered at West Point and employing 10,000 to 12,000 across Montgomery County.

The complex is the largest in the 60,000-employee company. It largely was spared from severe cuts in Merck's restructuring plan initiated last year.

Posts: 116 | From Bisbee, AZ USA | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
cutie
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8468

Icon 1 posted      Profile for cutie     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Too late for me...I already HAVE HPV! My gyno said she would let my immune system take care of it. I wonder if my immune response is even capable with my measely little 17 NK cells!

--------------------
Cutie

Posts: 125 | From Atlanta | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to the Terms and Conditions.

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.