LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Deciphering test results.

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Deciphering test results.
kissygoose
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 21314

Icon 1 posted      Profile for kissygoose     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Just got the results from my lyme blood test. According to the scale anything over 1.10 is positive. Mine was 3.88. The dr. who ordered the test (a surgeon who was treating an abcess that he thought might have been started as a tick bite) said that his guess was that I've had lyme's for quite a while.

So my question is: does the higher the number mean the longer you've had it?

Posts: 115 | From Central PA | Registered: Jul 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Nicole_Denise
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 20620

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Nicole_Denise     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Can you tell us the name of the blood test?

There are several different ones out there. This sounds like a PCR? Is that right?

Posts: 503 | From Alberta, Canada | Registered: Jun 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Leelee
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 19112

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Leelee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I think you may have had an ELISA test. If so, the fact that you got a positive is a SHOCK! That almost never happens as that particular test is very unreliable (it almost always gives a false negative).

Your question is an interesting one in that I have never heard of a correlation between a certain number and the length of time a person has been infected. Generally, I think, the higher the number, the more antibodies you have present in your blood at the particular time of the draw. This number can fluctuate.

I hope I have given you accurate information.

--------------------
The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy. Martin Luther King,Jr

Posts: 1573 | From Maryland | Registered: Feb 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Pinelady
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 18524

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Pinelady     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Now you need to find yourself a good LLMD.

I suspect it was a tick that had burrowed under

the skin. I have heard of this before. A

gentleman had one on his back. It had encased in

a cyst and he died from infection. After they

removed the cyst. It is subject to conjecture

that it could have possible been prevented if the

cyst had been removed without rupture. Not so in his case.

While the surgeon will direct you to starting

meds. It is vital you seek a LLMD who will treat

appropriately meaning not by the IDSA guidelines.

You can learn a lot here searching for symptoms and

hopefully find some new friends to help. Good Luck.

--------------------
Suspected Lyme 07 Test neg One band migrating in IgG region
unable to identify.Igenex Jan.09IFA titer 1:40 IND
IgM neg pos
31 +++ 34 IND 39 IND 41 IND 83-93 +
DX:Neuroborreliosis

Posts: 5850 | From Kentucky | Registered: Dec 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kissygoose
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 21314

Icon 1 posted      Profile for kissygoose     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I can't seem to find any reference to a name other than lyme disease screen. After the resutlts it reads "Due to recommendations by the fda, all positive or equivocal borellia burgdorferi antibody eia tests will be followed by the western blot...."

Then on the next page it lists a bunch of stuff under IGG western blot (41 kd igg band reactive) then IGM western blots (41 kd igm band reactive).

Since the surgeon was not familiar with the tests specifically he couldn't explain them other than to be surprised that it was positive at all.

Posts: 115 | From Central PA | Registered: Jul 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dekrator48
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 18239

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Dekrator48     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You really need a good LLMD.

You can go to the Seeking a Doctor board here and post for a LLMD in PA.

I sent you a private message.

--------------------
The fibromyalgia I've had for 32 years was an undiagnosed Lyme symptom.

"For I know the plans I have for you", declares the Lord, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future". -Jeremiah 29:11

Posts: 6076 | From Pennsylvania, USA | Registered: Nov 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
n.northernlights
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 17934

Icon 1 posted      Profile for n.northernlights     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You got an ELISA test which was positive, followed by a Western Blot which was positive too. Now those ordinary western blots run by ordinary labs only test for a few bands, but Igenex tests for more bands.

The western blot is the better one of these two tests. Usually people here only have the western blot show up positive with a band or several bands.


And, in ordinary western blots they do not report if there is a band but it is weaker than the reference band.


There are explanations of western blot results here on the forum.
Were there more results other than the 41 bands? According to the forum here the one positive 41 band , IgG or IgM, alone, says you are positive for lyme borrelia.


Sometimes very positive results on teh ELISA test do not correlate with the severity of the infection, on the contrary, people who are fine can have a huge ELISA result and very ill patients often or usually have a negative result.

That is because lyme borrelia lowers the immune system. The sicker you are, the worse off is your immune syetem. Yours seems okay. that is my interpretaion, I hope you get more answers.

Posts: 366 | From Europe | Registered: Nov 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.