LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter

The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive

The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » One Major Reason for Not Getting Well

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: One Major Reason for Not Getting Well

Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
New Study Exposes the Dark Side of New Genetically Engineered `Killer Weeds'... Posted by Dr. Mercola | May 06 2010 | 7,376 views

A report has found that farmers are planting too many so-called Roundup Ready crops.These plants are genetically engineered to resist the herbicide Roundup, which allows farmers to spray the chemical to kill weeds without harming their own crops.

But overuse of this approach to weed control is becoming a problem. Use of Roundup has increased to the point that weeds are also becoming resistant to the chemical.

That means that farmers have to start using additional herbicides, some of them even more toxic than Roundup.

More than 80 percent of the corn, soybean and cotton crops grown in the United States are genetically engineered.

New York Times April 13, 2010

BNET April 16, 2010

National Research Council April 13, 2010

Dr. Mercola's Comments:

The National Research Council report, which is being described as ``the first comprehensive assessment of how genetically modified (GM) crops are affecting all U.S. farmers,'' paints a dangerously rosy picture about genetically engineered crops.

While touting benefits like lower production costs, higher yields and declines in insecticide use, the report does not give justice to the seriousness of one glaring, and potentially devastating, finding: Superweeds.

GM Crops Create Superweeds and Super-Pests!
Since 1996, when GM crops were first introduced, at least nine species of U.S. weeds have developed resistance to glyphosate, the active ingredient in RoundUp herbicide.

In case you're not familiar with Roundup, Roundup Ready soybean, cotton and corn crops are the world's largest group of genetically modified crops. This particular variety of GM crops became so popular because it allows farmers to spray Monsanto's Roundup herbicide directly onto their fields without harming the crops. Ordinarily, if you were to spray Roundup, or any other glyphosate-based herbicide, onto a plant, it would die.

As you might imagine, the use of Roundup herbicide has increased dramatically since the GM Roundup Ready crops were introduced, and now the repeated exposures have given Mother Nature all she needs to stage her comeback.

Weeds have evolved so that they're resistant to Roundup, and as a result, farmers are applying even more herbicides to crops. This is, in fact, the National Research Council's advice to farmers who are facing issues with superweeds:

``In particular, farmers who grow GE herbicide-resistant crops should not rely exclusively on glyphosate and need to incorporate a range of weed management practices, including using other herbicide mixes.''

In other words, if applying loads of Roundup no longer works, simply start dousing your crops with other chemical mixtures and one of them is bound to work! Problem solved!

Of course, it is not nearly that simple.

80-90 Percent of Some U.S. Crops are Genetically Modified
One day, perhaps, when the health and environmental risks of GM foods have been widely accepted, more people will look back on this statistic and shake their heads.

For now, however, while several European countries have banned GM corn and other GM crops, the United States has allowed the technology to overwhelm much of commercial farming.

As of right now, about 85 percent of the corn grown in the United States is genetically engineered to either produce an insecticide, or to survive the application of herbicide. And about 91-93 percent of all soybeans are genetically engineered to survive massive doses of Roundup herbicide.

Also, according to the Institute for Responsible Technology, about 76 percent of cotton, 75 percent of canola and more than 50 percent of Hawaiian papaya grown in the United States are genetically modified as well.

The Institute for Responsible Technology has also compiled these other sources of GM foods to watch out for, including:

Zucchini and yellow squash (small amount)
Dairy products from cows injected with rbGH
Food additives, enzymes, flavorings, and processing agents, including the sweetener aspartame (NutraSweet) and rennet used to make hard cheeses
Meat, eggs, and dairy products from animals that have eaten GM feed
Honey and bee pollen that may have GM sources of pollen.
Tobacco (Quest brand)
Now, more than a decade after these crops have been monopolizing the market, the first report is released on how they might impact farmers. Most rational individuals would question why this type of report wasn't done first.

You and your family are already eating these foods, and the country has, in many ways, already taken steps that cannot be undone. Herbicide-resistant weeds are already popping up all over the United States, and only time will tell how widespread and difficult to control they will ultimately become.

GM Crops are Not Beneficial
Regardless of the favorable slant the National Research Council took in their report, it's time for people to realize that while the declared motive behind GM food is an altruistic one -- to alleviate hunger, poverty and malnutrition worldwide -- in reality, the ruthless propagation of GM crops are intended to create previously unimaginable profits above anything else.

Despite their assurances, we're already beginning to see the real price of all that tinkering with Mother Nature: unnatural crop combinations that can harm your health and potentially cause generational DNA changes, for example.

Not only that, but contrary to promises, GM crops are FAILING MISERABLY all across the world. The reality simply isn't living up to the hype of increased yields of healthy crops.

After 30 years of GMO experimentation, we have the data to show:

No increase in yields: on the contrary GM soya has decreased yields by up to 20 percent compared with non-GM soya. Up to 100 percent failures of Bt cotton have been recorded in India. And recent studies by scientists from the USDA and the University of Georgia found that growing GM cotton in the U.S. can result in a drop in income by up to 40 percent.
No reduction in pesticides use: on the contrary, USDA data shows that GM crops has increased pesticide use by 50 million pounds from 1996 to 2003 in the U.S., and the use of glyphosate went up more than 15-fold between 1994 and 2005, along with increases in other herbicides to cope with rising glyphosate-resistant superweeds.
Roundup herbicide is lethal to frogs and toxic to human placental and embryonic cells. Roundup is used in more than 80 percent of all GM crops planted in the world.
GM crops harm wildlife, as revealed by UK and U.S. studies.
Bt-resistant pests and Roundup-tolerant superweeds render the two major GM crop traits useless. The evolution of Bt resistant bollworms worldwide have now been confirmed and documented.
Vast areas of forests, pampas and cerrados have been lost to GM soya in Latin America.
Epidemic of suicides in the cotton belt of India. 100,000 farmers between 1993-2003, and an estimated 16,000 farmers a year since, have committed suicide since Bt cotton was introduced.
Transgene contamination is completely unavoidable, as science has recently revealed that the genome (whether plant, animal or human) is NOT constant and static, which is the scientific base for genetic engineering of plants and animals.
Instead, geneticists have discovered that the genome is remarkably dynamic and changeable, and constantly `conversing' and adapting to the environment. This interaction determines which genes are turned on, when, where, by what and how much, and for how long.

They've also found that the genetic material itself has the ability to be changed according to experience, passing it on to subsequent generations.

GM food and feed linked to deaths and sicknesses both in the fields in India and in lab tests around the world. For example, in April 2006, more than 70 Indian shepherds reported that 25 percent of their herds died within 5-7 days of continuous grazing on Bt cotton plants.
Given the myriad of data showing disastrous consequences for the environment and human health, I am not exaggerating when I say that genetically modified foods are, from my perception, one of the most significant threats that we have against the very sustainability of the human race.

You're a GM Guinea Pig
That's right. We all are, unfortunately.

How did this happen?

Michael Taylor, a former vice president of public policy and chief lobbyist at Monsanto Company(who is now the senior advisor for the FDA) is the person who ``oversaw the creation of GMO policy,'' according to Jeffrey Smith, the leading spokesperson on the dangers of GM foods. Smith continues:

``If GMOs are indeed responsible for massive sickness and death, then the individual who oversaw the FDA policy that facilitated their introduction holds a uniquely infamous role in human history. That person is Michael Taylor. He had been Monsanto's attorney before becoming policy chief at the FDA. Soon after, he became Monsanto's vice president and chief lobbyist.''

The FDA policy being referred to is the 1992 GMO policy, which stated:

"The agency is not aware of any information showing that foods derived by these new methods [genetic engineering] differ from other foods in any meaningful or uniform way."

In fact, the overwhelming consensus among the FDA's own scientists were that genetically modified foods were inherently dangerous and could create allergies, toxins, new diseases and nutritional problems, and of course they should be labeled because they are a food additive and new food additives must be labeled.

However, Smith explains, the FDA was directed by the White House to promote the biotechnology industry, and they knew that if they labeled GM foods, most Americans would avoid it like the plague. So, true to form, they supported the economic interests of the biotech companies at the cost of long-term human and environmental health.

You Can Still Avoid GM Food
The only silver lining to all of this is that you still have a choice in whether or not to consume GM foods. No, GM-containing foods are not labeled. And, yes, it takes some diligence on your part to determine whether the food you are eating is GM-free, but if enough people stop taking part in this massive GM experiment, food manufacturers will listen and stop buying GM ingredients.

For a helpful, straightforward guide to shopping Non-GMO, please see the Non-GMO Shopping Guide, created by the Institute for Responsible Technology.

In addition, the natural food industry has decided to turn October of this year into ``Non-GMO Month,'' and October 10th (10/10/10) will be ``Non-GMO Day.'' Please let your friends and family know about this important event, but don't wait until then to get started. You can make every day a No-GMO Day, and I suggest, for the sake of your health and the environment's, that you do.

Please Remember You CAN Make a Difference!

GMO foods have not been in Europe since 1999 because of public opposition. We have already been successful in causing industry to cut down their use of HFCS and our campaign last year against the swine flu vaccine worked to radically reduce the number of people immunized.

So PLEASE download this report and boycott GMO foods. Vote with your wallet and you will not only keep yourself and your family safe but your action will catalyze the necessary change to eliminate these dangerous crops from our food supply.

Related Links:
Superweeds are Sprouting in GMO Crops

Are GM Crops Spurring the Creation of Super Weeds?

Germany Bans Genetically Modified Corn

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 18524

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Pinelady     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Lots of good info there Massman.

Three short, hard-hitting video reports from Dr. Rima at Codex meeting:

Report Number 1: Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs) Another Codex trick: set nutritional levels so low that everyone will be in chronic nutritional

deficit - and think that it is normal. How? By food labels which teaches consumers that the daily levels are "normal intake levels" when, i

n fact, they are designed to have no impact on anyone, no matter how sensitive. This connects

directly to S. 510, the Food Fascism Bill, and S. 3218, the Wall Street Reform Bill that contains language which can kill dietary supplements

through hostile regulation. 5 minutes, 7 seconds.

Report Number 2: US wants to prevent labeling of GMOs anywhere in the world! More on health claims and NRVs. 9 minutes, 57 seconds

Report Number 3: Degrading Organic standards. What can you do about it? Plenty. Watch the

video and take the Action Steps. 9 minutes, 45 seconds

Is Killer Mold the Next Big Thing? The next pandemic panic? And is Nano Silver the Antidote?

We are keeping a close eye on the potential for a pandemic mold, cryptococcus gattii, possibly spotted in the north west.

Some researchers are concerned that this infectious mold, with a fifty percent fatality

rate, is another example of a weaponized pathogen that has been released, intentionally or not,

into the public. If this mold responds to biological terain including nano silver, silver

may be a very useful nutrient to have on hand!
My thinking is GMO is where Morgellons came

from-while not proven this is an effort to keep

us in the dark.

Suspected Lyme 07 Test neg One band migrating in IgG region
unable to identify.Igenex Jan.09IFA titer 1:40 IND
IgM neg pos
31 +++ 34 IND 39 IND 41 IND 83-93 +

Posts: 5850 | From Kentucky | Registered: Dec 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 22706

Icon 1 posted      Profile for MDW005     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
very informative, good info but sad and scary.

God's promises mean you always have something wonderful to look forward to.

Posts: 2150 | From Georgia | Registered: Oct 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
GMO is going to be the death of us all.

Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 94882 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 19883

Icon 1 posted      Profile for wtl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
That's just great. [Frown]
Posts: 822 | From midwest | Registered: Apr 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 19863

Icon 1 posted      Profile for springshowers     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yikes and Yuck

What are we thinking?? or NOT Thinking!!


Posts: 2747 | From Unites States Of America | Registered: Apr 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 15759

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Hoosiers51     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I have read that many countries in Europe won't buy our crops to feed their animals, because of the GMO in American crops. They feel it's not worth the risk.
Posts: 4590 | From Midwest | Registered: Jun 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 11830

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lymebytes   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
From Wikipedia:

Here is an excerpt that is sick.

GM foods were first put on the market in the early 1990s. Typically, genetically modified foods are transgenic plant products: soybean, corn, canola, and cotton seed oil. But animal products have also been developed. In 2006 a pig was controversially[1][2] engineered to produce omega-3 fatty acids through the expression of a roundworm gene.


Posts: 2003 | From endemic area | Registered: May 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 6974

Icon 13 posted      Profile for ping     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
We'll probably have to stop breathing next... This is such a complete drag; not even "food" anymore.

"We are more than containers for Lyme"

Posts: 1302 | From Back in TX again | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 21207

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Heleneh     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I watched the movie King Corn and it explained how corn is modified and sprayed so that it kills the weeds but not the corn. Also the corn is fed to the cattle. They can only eat it for a short time as it is acidic and will kill them. It is used to fatten them up for the market. Cattle are not corn eaters but grass grazers. It was a very good movie.
Posts: 140 | From Illinois | Registered: Jul 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 24316

Icon 1 posted      Profile for rks     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yes, it is scary.

There's a dvd called "Strange Culture" about an artist and professor in NY who was trying to inform people about GMFs back in 2004 through his art.

He ended up in jail, which I think he's still there. It's a crazy, sad story, but unfortunately true.

Posts: 217 | From Earth | Registered: Feb 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 20157

Icon 1 posted      Profile for nefferdun     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
A local wildlife rehabilitator here says the herbicides cause baby animals to have a very bad underbite - so bad if it is not corrected they often die. She said you can see this within days when herbicides are sprayed near the nests of birds. She uses cell salts to clear it out of their systems.

She has also seen a lot of sexually deformed animals due to pesticides and herbicides. Chemical fertilizer is also bad. These things are all petroleium based.

The main problem is over population in the world. We resorted to chemicals to grow more food but our soil is depleted and the food unhealthy.

old joke: idiopathic means the patient is pathological and the the doctor is an idiot

Posts: 4676 | From western Montana | Registered: Apr 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7273

Icon 1 posted      Profile for gwb     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Gripes my bleep. What can we do to put a stop to this, or is it just too far gone to stop at this point? This is so wrong.


Posts: 1349 | From OK | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator

Quick Reply

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.

Instant Graemlins

Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3

The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA

| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.