LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » General Support » Federal bills-important article.

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Federal bills-important article.
ellenluba
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 1707

Icon 1 posted      Profile for ellenluba     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050626/NEWS01/506260335

2 bills on Lyme disease spark division

By Elizabeth Lynch

Poughkeepsie Journal
June 26, 2005

Two Lyme-related bills pending in Congress are sparking divergent responses from local and regional groups.

U.S. Rep. Sue Kelly, R-Katonah, and U.S. Rep. Christopher Smith, a Republican from Hamilton, N.J., each introduced bills.

The bills are similar, but Smith's bill includes more specific goals.

Both bills call for developing tests to diagnose Lyme and would create a committee to advise the secretary of Health and Human Services. Smith's bill calls for $100 million over five years, while Kelly's calls for $50 million.

Both bills have been referred to committees.

"In 18 years, I haven't seen this much excitement from Lyme groups everywhere," said Pat Smith, president of the Lyme Disease Association, a national organizations based in New Jersey. The group supports Smith's bill.

Local Lyme advocates say the Kelly bill is not as comprehensive as the Smith bill.
Lyme is a tick-borne disease spread when an infected tick bites an individual.

More than 23,000 cases were reported nationally in 2002, though the disease is greatly under-reported, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Symptoms include a bull's-eye rash, fever, malaise, fatigue, head-ache, muscle and joint aches. Lyme can be treated with antibiotics, but isn't always easy to diagnose.

The Lyme Disease Foundation in Connecticut supports Kelly's bill, while the Hudson Valley Lyme Disease Association supports Smith's bill.

"This is really what [Kelly's] constituents want," Jill Auerbach, chairwoman of the Hudson Valley Lyme Disease Association, said of her group's support of the Smith bill. "Only one bill is going to get through Congress, if any at all. We want a bill that will do something. [Smith's] bill will do something."

Kelly bill given better chances

But Tom Forschner, executive director of the Lyme Disease Foundation, said Kelly's bill has a better chance of passing both houses of Congress.

"We know we're not going to get $100 million for Lyme. It's ridiculous," Forschner said, referring to the amount

Smith's bill calls for. He said Smith's bill also directs some of the money to organizations that are not under government oversight.
Auerbach said she has asked members of Kelly's staff to urge the congresswoman to withdraw her bill and support Smith's proposal.

That's unlikely to happen said Kevin Callahan, Kelly's spokesman.

"Any bill that can get through to support Lyme is positive," Callahan said. He said Kelly is planning to co-sponsor Smith's bill and she hopes Smith will back her proposal.

Both bills call for an advisory panel, but
Smith's bill calls for the panel to include a "diversity of scientific perspectives" to ensure the membership includes doctors who believe Lyme, especially chronic
Lyme, is a difficult disease to diagnose and treat, supporters said.
Smith's bill "provides more potential for patient-care benefits," said Barbara Buchman, executive director of the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society in Maryland.

Elizabeth Lynch can be reached at [email protected]


Posts: 819 | From New York, NY | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ellenluba
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 1707

Icon 1 posted      Profile for ellenluba     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Anyone planning to write to the Poughkeepsie Journal might be interested in knowing one fact that Jill Auerbach just made me aware of.

One hundred million for Lyme disease over five years is actually not a whole lot to ask for for the whole country.

Apparently, New York State alone, just one state. has spent 31 million dollars a year for a few years on West Nile Virus.

As you know, there were very few cases of West Nile reported.
Ellen
Ellen


Posts: 819 | From New York, NY | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
brainless
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6771

Icon 5 posted      Profile for brainless     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Is there any chance the two sides could sit down and hammer out a bill that we could ALL support?

b


Posts: 210 | From lalaland | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ann-OH
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 2020

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ann-OH     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks for posting this article, Ellen. I will send it on to the people on my "LD E-list."

I really liked this statement from the article:
"Any bill that can get through to support Lyme is positive," Callahan said. He said Kelly is planning to co-sponsor Smith's bill and she hopes Smith will back her proposal."

Sounds generous and logical. I am glad we are having a debate here, good for the old brain cells.

Ann - OH


Posts: 5705 | From Ohio | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.