LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter

The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive

The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » General Support » Daschle "Honest Medicine" and Lymeblog

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Daschle "Honest Medicine" and Lymeblog
Neil M Martin
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 2357

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Neil M Martin     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote

Note the blurb about Congressman Bedell's Lyme. NMM
For Tom Daschle and Barack Obama: Part 1:
Advocating the Integrative Healthcare Solution

Healthcare Reform is in the air. Tom Daschle's ``house parties'' have met, and people are posting their ideas all over the Internet. There's lots of discussion on websites such as and And on, people are voting for their favorite issues; several relate to healthcare.

Many of us are very hopeful that, when all is said and done, we will finally have Integrative Healthcare, with a combination of conventional medicine and so-called ``alternative'' medicine - what Dr. Ronald Hoffman has called ``Intelligent Medicine.''

In her December 31st Huffington Post column, ``Resolving to Care: Integrative Health Care Reform,'' health writer/advocate Alison Rose Levy wrote that hopefully, ``the coming healthcare reform under the Obama administration will improve quality and lower costs by accessing a wide range of Integrative Healthcare modalities,'' and that adopting Integrative Healthcare would signal ``an end to the long gravy train ride for pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies, and conventional practices based more on the profit motive than on caring.''

On the same day, integrative physician Deepak Chopra -- with input from fellow-integrative-doctor Andrew Weil and scientist Rustum Roy -- wrote another Huffington Post column, titled ``Leaving the Sinking Ship,'' also advocating Integrative Healthcare. (The ``sinking ship,'' by the way, refers to our deeply troubled, financially tied medical system.)

And while many books in past years have advocated Integrative Healthcare, one book has been recently published, with the express purpose of influencing those in charge of healthcare reform to include Alternative Medicine in the mix. In Health for Us All, integrative physician Mary Zennett, MD puts forth an articulate, impassioned argument, stating that, if we don't add sensible, cost-effective alternative treatments to healthcare reform, any plan we get will be doomed.

I agree.

The truth is that there are lots of non-toxic, less expensive, often non-pharmaceutically based treatments (both nutritional and non-nutritional) that have helped hundreds, even thousands, of people. Unfortunately, most of them are not being prescribed by conventional doctors, because they are NOT considered to be ``standard of care.'' In fact, because lots of these treatments are NOT "standard of care," doctors often call them -- derisively, of course -- "anecdotal." (Please see my article, "Four Lifesaving Treatments: Not So 'Anecdotal,' After All!")

What most people don't realize, however, is that being ``standard of care'' does NOT mean that a treatment is necessarily better; it just means that most doctors use it to treat specific conditions. And often these ``standard of care'' treatments do not work well - especially for chronic conditions. But - and here's the tricky part: Most ``standard of care'' treatments have the financial backing of (and have been ``studied'' by) Big Pharma. Most doctors have been trained to trust these treatments because of that backing.

It's all very confusing -- and, as several critics (including John Abramson, Marcia Angell, Shannon Brownlee, Melodie Petersen, and scores of others) have written, this way of thinking has led to a healthcare system that is bloated, industry-driven and frankly, not very good.

Tom Daschle's Criticism of Big Pharma and Big Industry

I believe that ``healthcare czar'' Tom Daschle really understands all this. In his book, Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis, he writes about Big Pharma's and Big Industry's duplicity. For instance:

(a) Invented conditions like ``restless leg syndrome''

(b) How new technology sometimes detects suspicious, NON-cancerous lumps, ``leading to unnecessary biopsies''

(c) How doctors often ``order tests, perform procedures, and prescribe drugs because they have a financial stake in doing so''

(d) How a study showed that angioplasties, which ``can save the lives of people who are in the midst of a heart attack,'' have ``dubious value to patients who aren't in imminent danger of dying.'' (It almost seems as if Tom Daschle has read Dr. Michael Ozner's The Great American Heart Hoax, which was published around the same time as Critical, and exposes many of the overused practices of interventional cardiology. For my review of Dr. Ozner's book, see Part 2 of this article.)

(e) Daschle even exposes Amgen, a company his wife's lobbying firm has represented, when he discloses the fact that Amgen and Johnson & Johnson ``had been paying hundreds of millions of dollars to doctors every year in return for prescribing anemia drugs which might be unsafe" -- anemia drugs which ``might even shorten lives when used at high doses.''

(Except for the ``restless leg syndrome'' example, which appears on page 9, all other examples cited above appear on pp 121-124.)

And, in his book, Tom Daschle cites the work of Shannon Brownlee, Marcia Angell and John Abramson - healthcare critics, all.

Tom Daschle's Support of Integrative Healthcare

I recently decided to do some research into Tom Daschle's background, and discovered several other hopeful signs:

♣ In the past, Mr. Daschle has advocated research into the value of ``Alternative Medicine.'' He supported BOTH Health Freedom AND Alternative Medicine, when he introduced the Access to Medical Treatment Act in the mid-1990s! (Read his pro-alternative-medicine stand here.)

In his speech reintroducing the Access to Medical Treatment Act, Mr. Daschle called it ``a bill to permit an individual to be treated by a health care practitioner with any method of medical treatment such individual requests.'' He described how he became aware of alternative medicine through his friend and colleague, Berkley Bedell (former Congressman from Iowa's 6th District), when Congressman Bedell became ill with Lyme disease. After trying -- to quote Mr. Daschle -- ``several unsuccessful rounds of conventional treatment consisting of heavy doses of antibiotics over approximately 4 years, he [Bedell] turned to an alternative treatment that he believes cured his disease'' - a treatment that Daschle pointed out ``can no longer be administered because it has not gone through the FDA approval process.''

Daschle went on to say: ``As I looked into the potential of alternative therapies, I was struck by what appears to be a deep-seated skepticism of alternative treatments within the medical establishment that may be impeding their use. It is clear to me that the public would benefit by greater debate about the value of alternative medical treatments, and it is to stimulate that debate and ultimately remove barriers to potentially effective treatments that I have reintroduced the Access to Medical Treatment Act. This legislation would allow individual patients and their physicians to use certain alternative and complementary therapies not approved by the FDA.''

♣ Tom Daschle has taken other potentially anti-Big Pharma/anti-Big Industry stands, too. As David Kirby pointed out, in his Huffington Post column of November 19, 2008, titled ``Tom Daschle: Friend to Many Autism Families,'' Mr. Daschle has actively questioned the safety of childhood vaccinations. As Kirby describes it, ``Senator Daschle is not anti-vaccine, but his record shows his determination to question - and even oppose - vaccine makers and big pharmaceutical interests when it comes to protecting the rights of American medical consumers.'' (This column is a really good read.)

♣ In addition, Tom Daschle was an early advocate of chiropractic, introducing (in 1991) the legislation that that would cause chiropractic care to be covered by Medicare.

In Part 2, I'll share with you seven of Honest Medicine's articles (and audios) in which I have advocated Integrative Healthcare.

January 10, 2009 in "Anecdotal" Treatments, Archived Articles, Barack Obama, Healthcare Reform, Tom Daschle | Permalink

Obama Health Policies Bode Ill for Lyme Disease Treatment
by: kansasdenies
Posted on: 01-08-2009 @ 12:12 pm

President-Elect Barack Obama has chosen former Senator Tom Daschle (rejected by South Dakota voters) as his nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Resources.

Tom Daschle wrote a book titled "What We Can Do about the Health-Care Crisis", published this year.

Daschle proposes the creation of the "Federal Health Advisory Board." Here comes the scary part. Daschle's FHAB would "recommend" a single standard of care to private insurers. Daschle claims no coercion with this "recommendation", but employers would not be able to take tax deductions for providing health insurance plans that do not comply with the single standard of care. That's not a carrot, that's a stick to keep employers from choosing plans with standards of care that differ from the federal single standard.

What would the single standard of care for Lyme disease be, as conjured up by the federal government's "advisory" board?

Look at the CDC website about Lyme disease and note that the only medical link is the IDSA guidelines, which claim Lyme disease shouldn't be treated at onset without a rash and 2 positive lab tests, and that chronic Lyme doesn't exist, thus eliminating long term antibiotic treatment. Despite requests from Lyme patient groups, the CDC refuses to post a link with IDSA Lyme disease guidelines.

Lyme patients moan about rationed treatment from private insurers, but the Obama plan is to eliminate private insurers in favor of a single payer plan, the federal government, and the federal single standard of care for Lyme diagnosis and treatment will conform to the IDSA guidelines which strictly ration treatment for Lyme.

All Americans will be required to contribute to one health care plan but will have no choice to select a plan that provides better coverage for their needs.

All public programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, will, of course, adhere to the single standard of care, including which drugs patients may take, and, presumably the duration of treatment allowed.

I can only hope that socialized medicine does not make it through congress. Read the heart breaking stories online from Lyme patients in England to learn how it's not working there. Lyme organizations need to lobby against a federal board that armtwists a single standard of care through the tax code.

A single standard of care for Lyme disease will be the IDSA standard of closely rationed care that is withheld except for severe injuries from chronic infection: meningitis but not fatigue or loss of mental acuity.

Americans need a health-care model that is owned and controlled by patients according to a Wall Street Journal editorial 1/7/09 written by Congressman and medical doctor Tom Price from Georgia. I agree.

Last updated on 01-08-2009 @ 12:23 pm

[ 13. January 2009, 07:30 PM: Message edited by: Neil M Martin ]


Posts: 697 | From Tucson, AZ USA | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator

Icon 10 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
neil, this was good of what i could read of it ... the short paragraphs.

i could not read about IOWA'S BERKLEY BEDELL since it was in one of your long block paragraphs.

neil, would you consider breaking up your longer paragraphs so we neuro patients can read and comprehend the comments and yours as well.

thank you my friend! [group hug] [kiss]

i know berkley founded his own LYME foundation/org ... can't remember the name of it based upon the MILK COLOSTRUM he took to get himself well.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 5867

Icon 1 posted      Profile for kgg   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks for posting this Neil. Interesting. It seems like the two articles are discussing two different people. One thinks alternative medicine is OK. The other wants a single standard of care.

The single standard of care scares me. The other is a little encouraging. I say a little because I don't put my faith in the government!!

Hope you are doing as well as possible these days.


Posts: 1607 | From Maine | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Neil M Martin
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 2357

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Neil M Martin     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
B.G. Does the http have shorter paragraphs?


Posts: 697 | From Tucson, AZ USA | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 15323

Icon 1 posted      Profile for liesandmorelies     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 

Thanks I had not read this yet. I knew bits and pieces of his thoughts, but find this very interesting, as I agree with Karen as this seems to describe two different ppl.

aka: Lyme Warrior

In order to do "real" science, you have to have a "real" conversation with nature.

Well Behaved Women Rarely Make History!

"Just Demand your Rights"

Posts: 869 | From nor - cal | Registered: Apr 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Neil M Martin
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 2357

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Neil M Martin     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
How to Make $5 Million Without Really Trying

Daschle Delayed Revealing Tax Glitch

How unbiased can a UnitedHealthCare advisor be?

Can anyone find advice he may have offered MA HMO United on Lyme disease?


Posts: 697 | From Tucson, AZ USA | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator

Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 

if i understand you correctly, you now showed the actual htpp address at the top! so i looked at it briefly; NO ... same size paragraphs but i enlarged everything and did see comment about iowa's berkley bedell's lyme comment. thanks for link.

it's hard to read there with 3 column vs. here w/1 column...just too long of paragraphs to comprehend and read.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator

Quick Reply

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.

Instant Graemlins

Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3

The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA

| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.