LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Activism » Idea: Tape AG Blumenthal's Announcement To An Infectious Disease Ducks' Office Door!

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Idea: Tape AG Blumenthal's Announcement To An Infectious Disease Ducks' Office Door!
daise
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Idea: On Monday I'm going to tape a copy of AG Blumenthal's announcement to the office door of this city's main duck office. And I'll sign it.

Duck hunt.

daise [Smile]

To make it easy, here it is, once again:

_________________


Connecticut Attorney General's Office

Press Release

Attorney General's Investigation Reveals Flawed Lyme Disease Guideline Process, IDSA Agrees To Reassess Guidelines, Install Independent Arbiter

May 1, 2008
Attorney General Richard Blumenthal today announced that his antitrust investigation has uncovered serious flaws in the Infectious Diseases Society of America's (IDSA) process for writing its 2006 Lyme disease guidelines and the IDSA has agreed to reassess them with the assistance of an outside arbiter.

The IDSA guidelines have sweeping and significant impacts on Lyme disease medical care. They are commonly applied by insurance companies in restricting coverage for long-term antibiotic treatment or other medical care and also strongly influence physician treatment decisions.

Insurance companies have denied coverage for long-term antibiotic treatment relying on these guidelines as justification. The guidelines are also widely cited for conclusions that chronic Lyme disease is nonexistent.

"This agreement vindicates my investigation -- finding undisclosed financial interests and forcing a reassessment of IDSA guidelines," Blumenthal said. "My office uncovered undisclosed financial interests held by several of the most powerful IDSA panelists. The IDSA's guideline panel improperly ignored or minimized consideration of alternative medical opinion and evidence regarding chronic Lyme disease, potentially raising serious questions about whether the recommendations reflected all relevant science.

"The IDSA's Lyme guideline process lacked important procedural safeguards requiring complete reevaluation of the 2006 Lyme disease guidelines -- in effect a comprehensive reassessment through a new panel. The new panel will accept and analyze all evidence, including divergent opinion. An independent neutral ombudsman -- expert in medical ethics and conflicts of interest, selected by both the IDSA and my office -- will assess the new panel for conflicts of interests and ensure its integrity."

Blumenthal's findings include the following:

* The IDSA failed to conduct a conflicts of interest review for any of the panelists prior to their appointment to the 2006 Lyme disease guideline panel;

* Subsequent disclosures demonstrate that several of the 2006 Lyme disease panelists had conflicts of interest;

* The IDSA failed to follow its own procedures for appointing the 2006 panel chairman and members, enabling the chairman, who held a bias regarding the existence of chronic Lyme, to handpick a likeminded panel without scrutiny by or formal approval of the IDSA's oversight committee;

* The IDSA's 2000 and 2006 Lyme disease panels refused to accept or meaningfully consider information regarding the existence of chronic Lyme disease, once removing a panelist from the 2000 panel who dissented from the group's position on chronic Lyme disease to achieve "consensus";

* The IDSA blocked appointment of scientists and physicians with divergent views on chronic Lyme who sought to serve on the 2006 guidelines panel by informing them that the panel was fully staffed, even though it was later expanded;

* The IDSA portrayed another medical association's Lyme disease guidelines as corroborating its own when it knew that the two panels shared several authors, including the chairmen of both groups, and were working on guidelines at the same time. In allowing its panelists to serve on both groups at the same time, IDSA violated its own conflicts of interest policy.

IDSA has reached an agreement with Blumenthal's office calling for creation of a review panel to thoroughly scrutinize the 2006 Lyme disease guidelines and update or revise them if necessary. The panel -- comprised of individuals without conflicts of interest -- will comprehensively review medical and scientific evidence and hold a scientific hearing to provide a forum for additional evidence. It will then determine whether each recommendation in the 2006 Lyme disease guidelines is justified by the evidence or needs revision or updating.

Blumenthal added, "The IDSA's 2006 Lyme disease guideline panel undercut its credibility by allowing individuals with financial interests -- in drug companies, Lyme disease diagnostic tests, patents and consulting arrangements with insurance companies -- to exclude divergent medical evidence and opinion. In today's healthcare system, clinical practice guidelines have tremendous influence on the marketing of medical services and products, insurance reimbursements and treatment decisions. As a result, medical societies that publish such guidelines have a legal and moral duty to use exacting safeguards and scientific standards.

"Our investigation was always about the IDSA's guidelines process -- not the science. IDSA should be recognized for its cooperation and agreement to address the serious concerns raised by my office. Our agreement with IDSA ensures that a new, conflicts-free panel will collect and review all pertinent information, reassess each recommendation and make necessary changes.

"This Action Plan -- incorporating a conflicts screen by an independent neutral expert and a public hearing to receive additional evidence -- can serve as a model for all medical organizations and societies that publish medical guidelines. This review should strengthen the public's confidence in such critical standards."

THE GUIDELINE REVIEW PROCESS

Under its agreement with the Attorney General's Office, the IDSA will create a review panel of eight to 12 members, none of whom served on the 2006 IDSA guideline panel. The IDSA must conduct an open application process and consider all applicants.

The agreement calls for the ombudsman selected by Blumenthal's office and the IDSA to ensure that the review panel and its chairperson are free of conflicts of interest.

Blumenthal and IDSA agreed to appoint Dr. Howard A. Brody as the ombudsman. Dr. Brody is a recognized expert and author on medical ethics and conflicts of interest and the director of the Institute for Medical Humanities at the University of Texas Medical Branch. Brody authored the book, "Hooked: Ethics, the Medical Profession and the Pharmaceutical Industry."

To assure that the review panel obtains divergent information, the panel will conduct an open scientific hearing at which it will hear scientific and medical presentations from interested parties. The agreement requires the hearing to be broadcast live to the public on the Internet via the IDSA's website. The Attorney General's Office, Dr. Brody and the review panel will together finalize the list of presenters at the hearing.

Once it has collected information from its review and open hearing, the panel will assess the information and determine whether the data and evidence supports each of the recommendations in the 2006 Lyme disease guidelines.

The panel will then vote on each recommendation in the IDSA's 2006 Lyme disease guidelines on whether it is supported by the scientific evidence. At least 75 percent of panel members must vote to sustain each recommendation or it will be revised.

Once the panel has acted on each recommendation, it will have three options: make no changes, modify the guidelines in part or replace them entirely.

The panel's final report will be published on the IDSA's website.

ADDITIONAL FINDINGS OF BLUMENTHAL'S INVESTIGATION

IDSA convened panels in 2000 and 2006 to research and publish guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease. Blumenthal's office found that the IDSA disregarded a 2000 panel member who argued that chronic and persistent Lyme disease exists. The 2000 panel pressured the panelist to conform to the group consensus and removed him as an author when he refused.

IDSA sought to portray a second set of Lyme disease guidelines issued by the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) as independently corroborating its findings. In fact, IDSA knew that the two panels shared key members, including the respective panel chairmen and were working on both sets of guidelines a the same time -- a violation of IDSA's conflicts of interest policy.

The resulting IDSA and AAN guidelines not only reached the same conclusions regarding the non-existence of chronic Lyme disease, their reasoning at times used strikingly similar language. Both entities, for example, dubbed symptoms persisting after treatment "Post-Lyme Syndrome" and defined it the same way.

When IDSA learned of the improper links between its panel and the AAN's panel, instead of enforcing its conflict of interest policy, it aggressively sought the AAN's endorsement to "strengthen" its guidelines' impact. The AAN panel -- particularly members who also served on the IDSA panel -- worked equally hard to win AAN's backing of IDSA's conclusions.

The two entities sought to portray each other's guidelines as separate and independent when the facts call into question that contention.

The IDSA subsequently cited AAN's supposed independent corroboration of its findings as part of its attempts to defeat federal legislation to create a Lyme disease advisory committee and state legislation supporting antibiotic therapy for chronic Lyme disease.

In a step that the British Medical Journal deemed "unusual," the IDSA included in its Lyme guidelines a statement calling them "voluntary" with "the ultimate determination of their application to be made by the physician in light of each patient's individual circumstances." In fact, United Healthcare, Health Net, Blue Cross of California, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan and other insurers have used the guidelines as justification to deny reimbursement for long-term antibiotic treatment.

Blumenthal thanked members his office who worked on the investigation -- Assistant Attorney General Thomas Ryan, former Assistant Attorney General Steven Rutstein and Paralegal Lorraine Measer under the direction of Assistant Attorney General Michael Cole, Chief of the Attorney General's Antitrust Department.

To view the entire IDSA agreement, go to the Attorney General's website.

http://www.ct.gov/ag/cwp/view.asp?a=2795&q=414284

[ 04. May 2008, 04:04 PM: Message edited by: daise ]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
cjnelson
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 12928

Icon 1 posted      Profile for cjnelson     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I have already faxed to many docotrs and it will be in their offices Monday morning!

:-)

--------------------
Seeking renewed health & vitality.
---------------------------------
Do not take anything I say as medical advice - I am NOT a dr!

Posts: 830 | From TN | Registered: Aug 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
daise
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi cjnelson,

Good for you! Does it feel good?

daise [Smile]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bettyg
Unregistered


Icon 14 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
daise and cj,

that's one way of getting out ACCURATE INFO WHAT BLUMENTHAL WROTE!! [bonk] [bow] [kiss]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
daise
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Betty,

Yes. It's direct information of the truth and a protest literally at the front door of infectious disease ducks, at the same time!

daise [Smile]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
wantabe
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 14703

Icon 1 posted      Profile for wantabe     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Sent a copy to my insurance co. That is STILL refusing to even pay for the tests. Not sure if it will help, but I decided to kill them with knowledge. Kindness is on thin ice...

wantabe [Big Grin]

--------------------
Lyme+ dx Dec.07
Currently: Levaquin,Cefdinir,Plaquinil,Fluconazole
Nystatin,B12 meth, nortriptyline
Ambien,Clonazepam,many supplements
Dairy, sugar, gluten free diet
infrared sauna and exercise

Posts: 235 | From Iowa | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
daise
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi wantabe,

Does Iowa's state insurance commission board (whatever its called) have an "outside appeals process?" That means, outside your insurance company, with this state board.

Health insurance companies really don't want you to file one of those appeals. They really don't. Na, na. Nope. They get scared.

For one, insurance companies are rated nationally by the number of phone complaints they get at their state insurance commission office and by the number of appeals filed, and by the number of appeals won. [Big Grin]

I'm sorry, but not every state has this. Well over half, do!

If Iowa does, look what you've got to prove that chronic Lyme exists? The above lovely announcement. Now you've got POWER to back you up.

I wish you the very best.

daise [Smile]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bettyg
Unregistered


Icon 13 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
daise, yes, iowa has insurance commissioner's office, regulation board, and i worked with them 9-10 MONTHS while fighting iowa's bcbs for 18 months!!

they weren't any help but did get better replies than what bcbs sent me!

WE have to keep pushing it; they don't do it on their own.


i know wantabe is dealing w/a different insurance company so it MAY be worth a try.

i show this info in my NEWBIE PACKAGE, and it shows the ADDRESS EMAIL and each state just changes it to their 2-LETTER STATE ABBREVIATION!


edited: forgot to say i printed off my broken up A.G. BLYMENTHAL'S LETTER, and will be dropping it OFF with the new local infectious dr. when i go in thurs for p.therapy! [Wink]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
daise
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi wantabe,

DId you read Betty's thread? There's hope.


Hi betty,

You wrote:
"edited: forgot to say i printed off my broken up A.G. BLYMENTHAL'S LETTER, and will be dropping it OFF with the new local infectious dr. when i go in thurs for p.therapy!"

You rabel-rouser you. (How on Earth is that spelled?)

daise [Smile]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bettyg
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
rebel rouser!! you bet i am; it takes ONE to know ONE! lol [lol] [Big Grin] [group hug] [kiss]
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
breezywings
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 9222

Icon 1 posted      Profile for breezywings   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'm IN! Great idea!!

--------------------
...~*Just keep swimming, Just keep swimming*~...

Posts: 120 | From New Jersey | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robin123
Moderator
Member # 9197

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Robin123     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Sounds like fun. What a lovely outing...
Posts: 13070 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
daise
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
More rabel-rousers. WAHOO!

(I forgot to bring my pen to sign it. Three guards were sitting close by. "May I borrow a pen?")

I also taped it to the door of an internist and to the door of a rheumatologist. Both had been sour appointments. That's why they got door postings. I'm not done yet.

daise [Smile]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robin123
Moderator
Member # 9197

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Robin123     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
lol, Daise, I love it!
Posts: 13070 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
daise
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Anybody else up for some fun?

daise [Smile]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bettyg
Unregistered


Icon 14 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
daise,
last thurs. when i had physical therapy, i took blumenthal's printout and gave it to the IDSA infectious drs. RN.

i asked if he might come out, but they asked WHO it was, and he's seen me 12-31`-07, so his RN came out.


same day, i saw receptionist for ceo for clinic in restroom same time as me, and i told her her BOSS/CEO owed me a letter also about getting CHRONIC LYME LITERATE MD HERE/ and 2 others since they have a monopoly of small clinics.


told her i'd talked to hubby's neurologist; he's on board of directors and PROMISED me a written reply about 1.5-2 months ago.

i'll have to call there and give him a FRIENDLY REMINDER!

i've not heard back from him but put my name on there, etc. and wrote LYME ACTIVIST!! [Big Grin]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
daise
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi!

You got to kill two birds with one stone, huh?
Twice. Or was it three times?
[Big Grin]

GO BETTY!

daise [Smile]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bettyg
Unregistered


Icon 10 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
...daise,

today went to a 1 hr. GI troubles talk by gi man who talked about the NEW CAMERA PILL YOU SWALLOW and they follow it thru system; then it's flushed down stool when you release it!


anyway, he had training in INFECTIOUS DISEASES early on and mentioned this 1st time he spoke on anything. so i always talk lyme w/him.


asked if he'd been keeping up on LYME WAR going on; a little.

asked him if the NEW infectious dr. i left blumenthal's decision with had SHARED that with him? NO, SEE HIM ABOUT IT OK!!
***********************************

i don't give up!! [Wink]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
daise
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Sticky-Betty.

daise [Smile]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.