LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Could Brucella canis (a coccobacilli) be the "Mystery bug"?

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Could Brucella canis (a coccobacilli) be the "Mystery bug"?
AliG
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 9734

Icon 2 posted      Profile for AliG     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
1) Brucellosis can be tick-transmitted.

2) Brucella canis can infect humans.

3) Brucella canis DOES NOT cross-react on Brucellosis tests & may be ruled out, even if physician may have suspected Brucella infection.

4) It seems the symptoms can be very similar to Lyme/Babesia/Bart/BLO....

5) Treatment failures & relapses possible.

6) Combination therapy necessary (of lengthy duration if not caught in early stage).


and FINALLY:

quote:
The organisms are gram negative. It is important to note that the penetration of counterstain may be slow and limited; 3 minutes of immersion may be necessary to identify the gram negativity.

The organisms are small, nonmotile coccobacilli or short rods (0.5-1.5 �m in length, 0.5-0.8 �m in width).

They are devoid of flagella or endospores, and if any capsule is found, it may be quite small.

They occur singly or in small groups.

They are usually slow-growing, strict anaerobes, although in some instances minimal facultative aerobic growth may occur.

*******************************************

My thought process at these links:

Brucella canis

Neurobrucellosis

**********************************************

My questions:

1) Has anyone with the Mystery bug been SPECIFICALLY tested for Brucella canis infection?

2) Has Dr.F specifically ruled out Br.canis?

[confused]

[ 07-28-2009, 02:53 PM: Message edited by: AliG ]

--------------------
Note: I'm NOT a medical professional. The information I share is from my own personal research and experience. Please do not construe anything I share as medical advice, which should only be obtained from a licensed medical practitioner.

Posts: 4881 | From Middlesex County, NJ | Registered: Jul 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
seibertneurolyme
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 6416

Icon 1 posted      Profile for seibertneurolyme     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
AliG,

While I do think that a few Lymies may have some form of Brucella (Brucellosis) I personally do not think that that infection is common enough to be the mystery bug. Supposedly since the advent of pasteurized milk brucellosis is a rare disease.

Also -- Dr F has said one of the mystery pathogens has a flagella -- I am assuming that one is the protozoa and not the bacteria?

Dr K at Clongen says the bacteria is motile -- who knows if that is the same bacteria that Fry has found? -- probability in my mind is that they are seeing the same bacteria and describing it differently

Also -- the bit about they occur singly or in small groups -- I get the impression from both the F Lab and Clongen that the bacteria are plentiful -- words such as many and numerous have been used on hubby's lab reports

But this is just my opinion.

And no hubby has not been tested for any form of brucella as far as I know.

If I was a betting person I would bet that the mystery bacteria is some as yet unidentified strain of mycoplasma.

Bea Seibert

Posts: 7306 | From Martinsville,VA,USA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
SForsgren
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7686

Icon 1 posted      Profile for SForsgren         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I think Brucella is very common. Some believe it was part of weaponizing Borrelia. So I would not be surprised to see many people also dealing with Brucella. I doubt it is the Mystery Bug though.

--------------------
Be well,
Scott

Posts: 4617 | From San Jose, CA | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
AliG
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 9734

Icon 1 posted      Profile for AliG     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks for that info, Bea & your thoughts, Scott [Smile] You're both probably right.

If Brucella canis is not normally detected in humans because it requires a different test than the other Brucellas, then perhaps it's as "rare" as Babesiosis? (just my speculation)

As for "singly or small groups", I was thinking that could be referring to how some may appear in a small cluster and some might be just an individual "dot" on an erythrocyte.?

So if Dr.F's protozoan has a flagella, then maybe this could be the bacteria, otherwise no such luck I guess.

Also Dr.K would have to be seeing a different bacteria for Dr.F's bacteria to be Br.canis since his was found to be motile.

Hmmmmm, how many different organisms could we possibly have inside us. [Roll Eyes]

I went to my LLMD today & he told me that there's some top rated ID in NJ that's been known to be Dxing loads of patients with Brucellosis. I wish I could remember the name.

His intonation told me that he didn't really believe they all actually had it. (I'll bet that Dr talks the same way about Drs who seem to Dx a lot of Lyme [Roll Eyes] )

He wrote the order for my next labs to include this test, so I guess we'll see where it takes me.

I have made quite a bit of progress and, reflecting on my treatment, many of the meds I've been on might have had an effect of Brucellosis, especially since the switch to Mino & Rifampin.

We've taken down my Optic Neuritis, Uhthoff's phenomenon (seen in MS), sweats, parasthesias, fibromyalgia muscle pain, joint pains and most of my neuro symptoms and I seem to be holding (knock wood) somewhat steady with Mino, Rifampin, Diflucan & Guaifenesin as my only meds for about 4 months now (I think).

When I go for the labs after completing 2 more months of treatment, how on earth will I know that I didn't have this & get rid of it, if I get a negative result? I'll report back with the results either way.

Maybe if I get a negative, and feel like symptoms are still controlled, I should repeat the Fry smear.

--------------------
Note: I'm NOT a medical professional. The information I share is from my own personal research and experience. Please do not construe anything I share as medical advice, which should only be obtained from a licensed medical practitioner.

Posts: 4881 | From Middlesex County, NJ | Registered: Jul 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lou
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 81

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lou     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
There is not a mystery bug, there are at least three.
Posts: 8430 | From Not available | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
seibertneurolyme
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 6416

Icon 1 posted      Profile for seibertneurolyme     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
lou,

Curious about your thoughts. Do you think that the motile bacteria Clongen sees is different than the bacteria F lab sees?

If not what is the 3rd pathogen you are referring too?

Thanks.

Bea Seibert

Posts: 7306 | From Martinsville,VA,USA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
karenl
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 17753

Icon 1 posted      Profile for karenl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
On TV they just showed kids with neuro / vision problems having toxocana ? parasites. Was in FL.

Has anyone heard of these bugs before?
They said can be in drinking water and you can get it from your dog.

Posts: 1834 | From US | Registered: Oct 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
AliG
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 9734

Icon 1 posted      Profile for AliG     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Toxocariasis - Wikipedia

Toxocariasis - emedicine

aka - Roundworm infection

larvae migrate to the eyes

That's one reason for monthly preventative wormers for your dog/cat.

I haven't heard of them in drinking water though. I don't know how they'd get there, unless a fly picked the eggs up & landed in your water glass.

There ARE other parasitic infections that people can get from drinking water.

--------------------
Note: I'm NOT a medical professional. The information I share is from my own personal research and experience. Please do not construe anything I share as medical advice, which should only be obtained from a licensed medical practitioner.

Posts: 4881 | From Middlesex County, NJ | Registered: Jul 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lou
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 81

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lou     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Bea, not sure who is seeing what, but my impression is that one of the bugs resembles toxoplasma, one is apparently this hemotropic mycoplasma (formerly called hemobartonella). What the third one is I don't know. BLO? Haven't a clue. But it also does not look like there are good treatments for the first two, and if #3 has survived everything that we have taken for lyme, babesia, then it apparently is not easy to treat either.
Posts: 8430 | From Not available | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
AliG
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 9734

Icon 1 posted      Profile for AliG     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
up

--------------------
Note: I'm NOT a medical professional. The information I share is from my own personal research and experience. Please do not construe anything I share as medical advice, which should only be obtained from a licensed medical practitioner.

Posts: 4881 | From Middlesex County, NJ | Registered: Jul 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.