I think that all this antibody techniques of diagnosis can be impair.
The only thing which CDC will be hard to questioning is microscope imaging of living spirochaetes for example using Variable Bradford Microscope System http://www.bradfordresearchinst.org/bvpm.html just like Dr Andrew Wright does in Great Britain,u can see it http://lymerick.ulmarweb.dk/video/AndyWright2004-640.wmv .
------------------
Do not take anything I say as medical advice. I am not a doctor, but I DID stay at a Holiday Inn Express!
oops!
Lymetutu
After its review, the DSMB unanimously recommended that NIAID terminate the treatment component of these studies. Their preliminary analysis showed that after 90 days of continuous antibiotic therapy there were no significant differences in the percentage of patients who felt that their symptoms had improved, gotten worse, or stayed the same between the antibiotic treatment and placebo groups in either trial . . .
The CDC is not helping us one little bit!
[This message has been edited by Danser (edited 12 August 2005).]
- JB
quote:
Originally posted by Danser:
From the website . . .After its review, the DSMB unanimously recommended that NIAID terminate the treatment component of these studies. Their preliminary analysis showed that after 90 days of continuous antibiotic therapy there were no significant differences in the percentage of patients who felt that their symptoms had improved, gotten worse, or stayed the same between the antibiotic treatment and placebo groups in either trial . . .
The CDC is not helping us one little bit!
[This message has been edited by Danser (edited 12 August 2005).]
What a load of crap that is. They're obviously 'asking' the wrong people. Only after 9-10 months of abx did I see a marked improvement.
DLL
Too bad a few CDC members won't voluntarily infect themselves with lyme and receive only the 3 week treatment.
Maybe then they would change their tune. I bet you not one of them has chronic lyme!
- JB