This is topic test result: what do yall think? in forum Medical Questions at LymeNet Flash.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flash.lymenet.org/ubb/ultimatebb.php/topic/1/73650

Posted by mrsoatee (Member # 17856) on :
 
I finally got my test results from my dr. what do yall think??
Lyme IgG/IgM Ab <0.91 Index 0.00-0.90
Negative <0.91
Equivocal 0.91-1.09
Positive >1.09

Lymedisease Ab, Quant, IgM <0.91 Index 0.00-0.91
Negative <0.91
Equivocal 0.91-1.09
Positive >1.09
 
Posted by Keebler (Member # 12673) on :
 
-

I'm not sure all the information is here.


All I can gather is that you report Lyme IgG/IgM Ab <0.91 so that, according to parameters of this test it would be negative.


What lab ran the tests?


Was this an ELISA test? If so, they are highly unreliable.


With the IgG and IgM, I expected to see band numbers but there are none. A Western Blot is best, but only from certain labs.


www.igenex.com

Igenex - you can read more about tests.


-
 
Posted by JesseSapp (Member # 16630) on :
 
It's an ELISA. Your result is "negative". That being said, the ELISA is not a very good test for lyme disease. Generally, it is a clinical diagnosis. If you are looking for a more accurate test, most doctors well versed in lyme disease will skip the ELISA and proceed directly to a western blot. Most people will start with a standard test at Labcorp, MDL or Quest (typically because insurance will cover these tests) and then procede (in many cases) to a Igenix test (which is out of pocket). But again, a test (any test) should be a portion of the diagnostic workup, but is not everything. There are other medical tests to diagnose disease that are generally 100% accurate (cholesterol testing for example), but in lyme disease the testing is generally poor and the diagnosis is primarily clinical. Unfortunately, a clinical diagnosis in the absense of a confirmatory laboratory study doesn't carry much weight in terms of insurance reimburcement or disability applications.
 
Posted by adamm (Member # 11910) on :
 
You got a negative on a test that misses upwards of two thirds of

the cases out there. You should search around for the study Johns

Hopkins (in basically all other respects a god-awful institution when it

comes to Lyme) put out on the currently available blood testing--

they basically concluded that it all sucks.
 


Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3