This is topic daughter lyme positive, interepreting new test results in forum Medical Questions at LymeNet Flash.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flash.lymenet.org/ubb/ultimatebb.php/topic/1/86372

Posted by purplemom (Member # 21064) on :
 
I am too tired to read through things myself right now and want a couple quick answers:

My daughter was diagnosed with lyme in June (the 15th) via positive IgG and IgM and then CDC positive Western Blot from Mayo labs even. Bell's palsy, fever, muscle aches

Retested last week and she is still positive IgG and IgM and her western blot is still CDC positive for IGM.

1st WB results:

IgG 39, 41

IgM 23, 39, 41

2nd WB results:

IgG 41

IgM 39, 41

So the WB has changed a bit. What do the ISDA guidelines say about determining active infection? I know we think they are nuts but assuming my pedi is going to go by that I am curious. She does not appear to have active symptoms. How does an ILADS physician determine active infection in someone without symptoms?
 
Posted by purplemom (Member # 21064) on :
 
PS same lab used Mayo...
 
Posted by purplemom (Member # 21064) on :
 
PS again. she was treated with amoxicillin enough even according to Dr. B's guidelines
 
Posted by KS (Member # 12549) on :
 
Unfortunately these test results have little meaning. They suggest that your daughter had lyme and was treated before eliciting a strong IgG response (usually the later antibody response). However, these tests are poor and inaccurate. The fact that she still has an IgM response COULD mean that she is still actively infected or that simply those antibodies are still lingering in her body from being infected in June.

I suspect I'm only confusing things. Essentially, treat based on symptoms and try not to put to much value in the test results. You at least knew she had lyme and that's about all you can take away....
 
Posted by purplemom (Member # 21064) on :
 
It is really hard to live with that. She appears healthy but every time she gets sick or has a symptom I don't want to have to wonder about lyme. what if she gets b iten by a new tick?
 
Posted by Pinelady (Member # 18524) on :
 
Have you thought about a maintainance dose? If this bug truly acts like syphilis I would want one. But I don't know what LLMD's like to do about that problem.
 
Posted by n.northernlights (Member # 17934) on :
 
I read recently that if the test becomes less positive, it means the infection is getting better.

You could consider rife or homeopathics or herbs, and the diet (sugar lowers the immune system very mcuh, for example, and many people can cope with any remaining borrelia bacteriae just with their immune system, so it is important to eat right etc)
I think rifing is cheap and it does not involve antibiotics.
Probiotics are important for the immune system too, the antibiotics have killed off all the good bacteriae and now she needs all the good ones back.
Maybe going gluten-free and sugar-free is worth considering. (read about diet and supplemets in burrascano's guidelines)
 
Posted by Troup Brazelton (Member # 6297) on :
 
Test are meaningless at this point. All treatment should be based on length of time she had symptoms and if she still has synptoms. Rule of thumb is from 1st date of illness count the months and take that number of months of abx and add one or two after the symptoms have disappeared completely.

Lyme has a way of hidding from treatment and can come back. Be sure your treatment included several forms of abx as spelled out in Dr. B guidlines.

I don't believe 30 days of abx will cure lyme that you've had for 60 days and the doctors that say the symptoms that reappear are only your immune system responding, are wrong.
 
Posted by sutherngrl (Member # 16270) on :
 
Lyme is a clinical diagnosis!!!
 
Posted by Geneal (Member # 10375) on :
 
I would treat until your daughter remains symptom free

For at least 3-4 months.

I have two young children (congenital Lyme) who treated until that point.

Both off antibiotics and both doing well other than the flu. [Frown]

The Western Blot is an antibody test.

My LLMD believes that often the very sickest people with Lyme

Are the ones with the least amount of positive bands.

Testing is not an indicator of whether the disease has

Been erradicated......or not.

You may produce antibodies your whole life and not be symptomatic.

You may also have minimal positive bands and be very ill.

I don't think testing is a good indicator of wellness.

How does your daughter feel?

As for the worry about every cough, sneeze, ache and pain...

It goes on and on. Just like worrying about another tick bite.

Unfortunately just part of our reality as ones who now know

More about Lyme disease than most people in this world.

Hugs,

Geneal
 
Posted by purplemom (Member # 21064) on :
 
I think what I am trying to understand is how would a IDSA MD explain this so that I can try to understand what view point my physician may take and then being able to have other research as neeed.

Does the IDSA really believe that whether you have had lyme for a week or 6 months you still require the same amount of antibiotics?
 
Posted by Geneal (Member # 10375) on :
 
Yes the IDSA believes in the "28" day cure whether

You were just bitten or had Lyme for years.

Sigh.

Is your daughter seeing a LLMD?

Hugs,

Geneal
 


Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3