Is it worth doing a cd57 or another Igenex western blot to see if I have relapsed?
It has been too long for me to really remember the igg vs igm bands and timeframes.
Posted by TF (Member # 14183) on :
No sense doing a western blot. People who had lyme in the past will test positive on a western blot because your body will produce antibodies to lyme for YEARS after you get rid of the infection.
For those of us who have had lyme in the past, diagnosis is basically by symptoms. There are some DIRECT tests for the lyme bacteria, and they are VERY expensive.
My lyme doc did some relatively new test on me about 6 years ago. It said I had lyme. Meanwhile I didn't have any lyme symptoms.
What I had was a severe sinus infection consisting of MRSA and 2 other normally hospital-acquired infections. I switched ENTs and got rid of my sickness.
So, I spent $500 on this worthless test! Learn from my experience.
And, my insurance would not pay anything toward this test. You know that insurance is going to follow the IDSA. YOu will not be reimbursed for any direct test for lyme.
Relapse is diagnosed by symptoms and giving you a trial course of treatment basically.
The CD 57 is not reliable.
Posted by Brussels (Member # 13480) on :