Those wiggly "worms" under a microscope some believe to be spirochetes aren't Lyme. (or bacteria) I saw these in my blood at a live cell analysis, thinking they were Lyme, as many photos and videos of others say those "worms" may be Lyme. Mystery solved with this study. See the pics here! https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-10479-8#Fig2 The study says it's blood cells! And all healthy people have them. Here's another article on this: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0163582 Posted by Keebler (Member # 12673) on :
- While we may have some variations "space junk" floating around in us, perhaps . . . I do think sometimes things are discounted, though. Spirochetes can shape shift, too. And one sudden photo can't always capture all angles or physical aspects of a potential "troublesome" microbe.
Re: your first link, image C
FWIW: They mention "not bacteria" as if there are no other microbes . . . or forms bacteria might take such as the cyctic form (of course) . . . .
Just start with this protozoa "cousins" so to speak:
Google: babesia, RBC, microscope
& then - if they don't want to admit babesia might be a problem see similarities with an image search for:
[ 07-18-2018, 09:14 PM: Message edited by: Keebler ]
Posted by bluelyme (Member # 47170) on :
To verify whether the bacteria-like forms proliferate, we incubated human blood at 30 °C for several days and determined the size distribution and number of bacteria-like forms and refringent particles during incubation using dynamic light scattering (DLS) (Fig. 3A and B)"
sounds kinda like propaganda to quell the pandemic imho ....k is definitively a kete ...incubation takes 21 days.... those are l form bacteria according to lida mattman