LymeNet Flash: Scott's editing

This is topic Scott's editing in forum General Support at LymeNet Flash.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flash.lymenet.org/ubb/ultimatebb.php/topic/3/10103

Posted by kaos (Member # 4144) on :

What else did you guys expect him to do? Scott is walking away with battle wounds, and by doing so, he's keeping his sanity. I hope Scott continues to shares his knowledge at the new Marshall Protocol Group:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/marshallprotocol/

I also have little doubt that the skeptics will follow to that group too...and don't forget to wear your "I have Lyme and always will" T-shirts.

[This message has been edited by kaos (edited 13 May 2004).]

Posted by troutscout (Member # 3121) on :

This man has done SO much for my the Iowa lYme Disease Association, has spent countless hours in search of a possible cure....and this is how he must end his experience with ALL of us here.

What a Travesty.

And to my colleague..
I bid you a Fond Farewell.

Trout

Farewell.

------------------
Now is the time in your life to find the "tiger" within.
Let the claws be bared,
and Lyme BEWARE!!!
Iowa Lyme Disease Assoc. www.ildf.info

[This message has been edited by troutscout (edited 13 May 2004).]

Posted by Mo (Member # 2863) on :

IMO, Scotts editing is just as much an obstruction of answers as anyone else's unproductive comments or behavior.

Pretty sad..

both sets of assertion yay or nay were obstructing the persuit of answers, totally lacking in intelligent contribution..I'm fed up with both sets of comments from the peanut gallery.

Are we so incapable of rational FREE discussion ??

Lyme patients are nothing if not resourseful,
active learners. I'm grateful for the information brought to light, but don't think those of you who brought it are the ones to help very much in the quest for answers.

I hope some of us can continue to look at the information, and make sense of the theories as they may or may not pertain to our illness.

It's the information itself that has some value in looking at, whether viable or not.

I hope more level headed discussions can take place in the absence of the madness eminating from BOTH "sides"..

There shouldn't be "sides"...knowledge dies without respectful adddress to legitimate contributions and concerns.

We just can't afford that.

[This message has been edited by Mo (edited 13 May 2004).]

Posted by TX Lyme Mom (Member # 3162) on :

Here is the link to the list of discussion topics at the SarcInfo website "Phorum". There's a lot of equally good information there.

http://sarcinfo.com/phorum/list.php?f=1

I'm just grateful for having been introduced to this material. We can each pursue it on our own now.

I really do wish, however, that Scott had not decided to delete his valuable posts under the "Pathogenesis" topic, where no derisive or negative remarks had been posted. That is most regretable indeed.

Posted by treepatrol (Member # 4117) on :

Iam sorry Scott feels that way.I wish he hadnt deleted his posts also.
I had no and I mean NO intentions of shutting him down.

All I wanted was to see this studied by someone in the field of medicine to prove or disprove the use of it for lyme.

I have been called alot of things today and I havent reciprocated.

For goodness sakes everybody dont you think I want a cure ?

I have been suffering from this crap since 1988 and I just got a Dr to finally treat me in 2001. Also my wife has it she wasn't bitten at least that we ever saw. So now Iam here trying to help and get accused of everything from well you name it.

Iam sorry I cant have a opinion different from the rest of you.
I forgive any wrong doing and I hope you do to for your own sakes.

From my heart

------------------
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.