This is topic Came across this Article from last April in forum General Support at LymeNet Flash.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flash.lymenet.org/ubb/ultimatebb.php/topic/3/18917

Posted by beckyM (Member # 13944) on :
 
I was doing a search and I came across this article from last April...I am sure that some people here have already seen it...

But, I really liked the article and I wanted to post it for others who had never read it.

I even double spaced it for the neurolymies...(and now my eyes are killing me!!!)

I love the point about vaccines...WHY DO WE NEED A VACCINE FOR A DISEASE THAT THEY DONT THINK IS A BIG DEAL!!!!!!

Kind of makes you wonder...

FYI...I don't know why it is posting funny (kind of condensed) ...LYMENET has been weird today!!!!! [Smile]
http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/04/17/102846.php


The State of Connecticut vs. Dr. Charles Ray Jones - A Hangin' In Hartford
Written by Rick Vassar
Published April 17, 2007

Lyme Disease Doctor Risks Career to Treat

Chronically Ill Kids

You hand in your ticket, to go see the geek, who
walks up to you, when he hears you speak,
Says `How does it feel to be such a freak', you
say `impossible' as he hands you a bone.

And something is happening and you don't know what it is, do you Mister Jones... Bob Dylan -"Balladof the Thin Man"

Dr. Charles Ray Jones is a physician in
Connecticut. He treats kids. Sick kids. Really
sick kids.

These kids have chronic Lyme disease. The Lyme bug, transmitted by tick bite, is quite treatable if it's caught and diagnosed quickly, and can be cleared up with a relatively short course of oral antibiotics.

If the bug sets up shop in the body, though, the
resulting maladies can be quite severe.

Rheumatoid arthritis, cardiovascular problems,
migraines, and diminishing cognitive ability are
just a few of this disease's debilitating
results.

The problem with Lyme disease is that these symptoms have varying forms of severity, and this makes it hard to diagnose and difficult to treat.

The good news - Lyme disease will rarely kill
you. The bad news - treating a Lyme patient can
go on for years, and can be very expensive.

In my experience, there are two things health
insurers really hate:

Diseases that go on indefinitely
Diseases that are expensive to treat

Since Lyme disease fits into both categories, it's not surprising that health insurers are
reluctant to pay for ongoing treatment.

It just doesn't fit their vision of the bottom line. This is where it gets interesting.

The Case of Dr. Charles Ray Jones

Dr. Jones has been advocating aggressive
treatment of chronic Lyme disease for years.

He has treated thousands of kids with great
success.

One day, he receives a call from a parent who ostensibly wants antibiotics for their child due to the effects of Lyme.

Dr. Jones allegedly prescribes antibiotics over the phone.

Well, it turns out that the child was central to a custody battle, and it appears Dr. Jones got caught up in this.

A complaint was made to the medical board, and Dr. Jones has spent the past few years defending himself.

Late last year, the Infectious Disease Society
of America (IDSA), stated in no uncertain terms
that long term chronic Lyme does not exist,
meaning that in their opinion, Dr. Jones is
practicing voodoo medicine and he must be
stopped at all costs.

Dr. Jones is 77 years old. He really doesn't
need this. He could just walk away.

In fact, the State of Connecticut told him just that: retire, give up your license, and we will drop the charges.

Dr. Jones has decided to fight, for the kids, incurring the wrath of his licensing state and the loss of his reputation.

He goes back before the board this Thursday, April 19, 2007.

The Infectious Disease Society of American (IDSA)
The State of Connecticut intends to call Dr.
Eugene Shapiro of the Yale University School of
Medicine.

Dr. Shapiro helped shape the research that led the IDSA to say unequivocally that chronic Lyme disease does not exist.

They say the science is good. They say their
guidelines are voluntary.

They also state that members of the panel who wrote the guidelines have ties to Lyme product producers who will benefit from the findings.

Some even have ties to Baxter vaccines, a pharmaceutical company developing a Lyme vaccine.

It seems a Lyme vaccine is more valuable to the manufacturer when the effects of the disease are short term and can be cured in a majority of patients.

Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal
thinks the IDSA's science is good.

He also believes that the science is incomplete, and that the IDSA may have held back the science
that did not enhance its conclusion.

If so, Blumenthal contends, the IDSA may have violated state antitrust laws.

The reason?

Although the guidelines are voluntary, health
insurers are using the IDSA's findings in their
evidence of insurance to deny an ailment categorized as chronic Lyme disease.

If the IDSA held back information that challenges their findings, patients in Connecticut have limited access to covered treatments, and that could be an antitrust violation.

The Big Picture

So then there's Dr. Jones. He tells the IDSA
they are wrong.

He continues to treat patients with chronic Lyme disease.

Nobody really cares all that much, except his patients, who see him as their last hope.

Then these patients submit their bills to their insurance company. Sorry, they're told, it's not covered. Why?

Well, it's not a disease.

So the patient sues. And the insurers gets
ticked (no pun intended), and very conveniently,
someone comes forward with a complaint, and the
licensing authority comes in with its full force
of law.

Why do you think most doctors won't
treat chronic Lyme disease?

They're afraid. They're afraid of losing
everything, like Dr. Jones.

And if you think this is an isolated incident,
think again.

Dr. Zackrison in Virginia, Dr. Jemsek in North Carolina, among others, have been intimidated and threatened in incidents similar to Dr. Jones.

An innocuous complaint turns into a career threatening event.

Many more doctors turn away patients at the door because they can't afford the risk.

The IDSA says that they are concerned that a long course of antibiotics may be counterproductive to the healing process.

They believe their findings are protecting the
patient from needless long-term therapy.

They do this by telling folks that the illness doesn't exist long term and recovery from the short term effects of Lyme disease can be cleared up with a mild and short course of antibiotics.

I have two questions for the IDSA:

If Lyme disease is so easy to clear up, why in
the world would we need a vaccine?

If chronic Lyme disease does not exist, what the
heck do all these people have?

They're pretty good at telling us what it isn't.

I'm guessing if you diagnose another cause, the health insurers would be obligated to pay for treatment for a seriously ill patient who won't die. And that's not good.

There is a coordinated effort to control the
outflow of funds from the insurers, using the
medical community to fight for the greater good
of the bottom line.

Dr. Jones is merely collateral damage. It's good business. It's bad medicine.

And don't believe for a minute that this
strategy is reserved for this one chronic
illness. Your illness may be next.

In fact, if I had to make a prediction as to a disease that is being primed for this, the answer to me is obvious: autism.

[ 19. December 2007, 09:14 AM: Message edited by: beckyM ]
 
Posted by Lymetoo (Member # 743) on :
 
Hey... To save you trouble and our eyes....next time just space after every sentence, not every line.

Thanks for going to all that hard work to present a great article for others!!

[Smile]
 


Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3