posted
If so, would it be found in greater concentrations in the fat more than muscle or other tissues? I know it probably accounts for the abundance of neurologic problems, but I was wondering if realtively large concentrations would be found in other fatty deposits as well, i.e., abdominal fat.
If anyone has a link to any info on this, I'd love to read some info on it.
Thanks!
Posts: 449 | From Pasadena, CA, usa | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
GiGi
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 259
posted
We were treated based on this finding:
"........ the cells of the body are harmed by toxic metals whereas the invading microorganisms can often thrive in a heavy metal environment. Research by Ludwig, Voll and others in Germany, by Omura and myself here in the US, showed that microorganisms tend to set up their housekeeping in those body compartments, that have the highest pollution with toxic metals. The body's own immune cells are incapacitated in those areas whereas the microorganisms multiply and thrive in an undisturbed way. The teeth, jawbone, Peyers patches in the gutwall, the groundsystem (connective tissue) and the autonomic ganglia are common sites of metal storage - where microorganisms thrive. Furthermore, those body areas also are vasoconstricted and hypoperfused (by blood, nutrients and oxygen), which fosters the growth of anaerobic germs, fungi and viruses"
They tend to live where healthy blood does not reach them and where the terrain is contaminated.
If you would like, the rest of this article is at www.neuraltherapy.com/articles entitled Chronic Disease and Heavy Metals.
Take care.
Posts: 9834 | From Washington State | Registered: Oct 2000
| IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic