LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Brook's LLMd who cured her

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Brook's LLMd who cured her
jenin98
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 12617

Icon 1 posted      Profile for jenin98     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Guys,
did you know it was the Dr. Burascano who did the non-fda approved procedure which cured Brook (you know, channel 10 reporter who was on Good morning America). Read her blog, she said so. so, Dr. B's protocol works.
Jenin

Posts: 455 | From Maryland | Registered: Jul 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
CaliforniaLyme
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 7136

Icon 1 posted      Profile for CaliforniaLyme     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Jen, I don't think Brooke is in full remission from what I understand, but Doc B's protocol is the #1 thing I have seen put chronic longterm Lymies into full remission. He is an angel*!)!

--------------------
There is no wealth but life.
-John Ruskin

All truth goes through 3 stages: first it is ridiculed: then it is violently opposed: finally it is accepted as self evident. - Schopenhauer

Posts: 5639 | From Aptos CA USA | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
adamm
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
and what is this protocol?
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
CaliforniaLyme
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 7136

Icon 1 posted      Profile for CaliforniaLyme     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Dr. B's Treatment Guidelines are the main protocol used by ILADS. Dr. B is hands down the best Lyme doctor in the world. He is an angel.
I have met him a couple of times.

Here are the 2005 Doc B treatment guidelines- ILADS Treatment Guidelines are basically his guidelines updated-

Doc B Guidelines 2005
http://ilads.org/burrascano_0905.html

ILADS 2006

http://ilads.org/files/ILADS_Guidelines.pdf

I will tell you a pathetic wonderful true story.

Years ago before they did the official study which showed my state park where I live has the highest tick infection rate in all of California, I used to go post tick warning signs for people because it is the most popular biking park in all of our county. So I was there with my xeroxed sheets of paper and was tacking them up when I came across a white piece of paper pinned to a tree in the middle of the forest.

It was handwritten and it said, I am not joking, (not verbatim but along these lines):

"If you get sick after being in these woods
find Dr. B's Lyme Disease Treatment Guidelines online and get treatment."

To THIS day I have NEVER met the person who posted that in our local woods. That was when there were only a few of us in the support group- and I almost wept when I read it to know that somewhere in and out of those woods was this other person like me trying to reach out to people. I hope I meet that person one day!!!!

I will never forget the CHILL that ran over me, knowing that many of us had the same experience THERE, in Nisene Marks State Park.

NOW we know that it is the single highest spot in all of California for lyme disease!!! Just my Lymed luck*)!!! but I still hope one day someone will come to the support group and say,
"Years ago I used to post papers in Nisene!!!"

And I will go, "HEY!!! I know who you are!"

--------------------
There is no wealth but life.
-John Ruskin

All truth goes through 3 stages: first it is ridiculed: then it is violently opposed: finally it is accepted as self evident. - Schopenhauer

Posts: 5639 | From Aptos CA USA | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
CaliforniaLyme
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 7136

Icon 1 posted      Profile for CaliforniaLyme     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
He is the main doctor to testify at the Senate hearings in 1993 on Lyme Disease and his license was almost removed more than once- he was targeted after he testified.You know what, we NEED to re-evaluate the writing of Docs names on here because all newbies should know who Doc B is- he is one of our very best!!! Here is his testimony:

The Lyme Disease Conspiracy
by Joseph J. Burrascano, Jr., M.D.
Reprinted from Senate Committee Hearing
on Lyme Disease August 5, 1993
-------------------------------------------------
"There is a core group of university-based Lyme disease researchers and physicians whose opinions carry a great deal of weight. Unfortunately many of them act unscientifically and unethically. They adhere to outdated, self-serving views and attempt to personally discredit those whose opinions differ from their own. They exert strong ethically questionable influence on medical journals, which enables them to publish and promote articles that are badly flawed. They work with government agencies to bias the agenda of consensus meetings, and have worked to exclude from these meetings and scientific seminars those with alternate opinions. They behave this way for reasons of personal or professional gain, and are involved in obvious conflicts of interest.

This group promotes the idea that Lyme is a simple, rare illness that is easy to avoid, difficult to acquire, simple to diagnose, and easily treated and cured with 30 days or less of antibiotics.

The truth is that Lyme is the fastest growing infectious illness in this country after AIDS, with a cost to society measured in the billions of dollars. It can be acquired by anyone who goes outdoors, very often goes undiagnosed for months, years, or forever in some patients, and can render a patient chronically ill and even totally disabled despite what this core group refers to as "adequate" therapy. There have been deaths from Lyme disease.

They feel that when the patient fails to respond to their treatment regimens it is because the patient developed what they named "the post Lyme syndrome". They claim that this is not an infectious problem, but a rheumatologic or arthritic malady due to activation of the immune system.

The fact is, this cannot be related to any consistent abnormality other than persistent infection. As further proof, vaccinated animals whose immune system has been activated by Lyme have never developed this syndrome. On the other hand, there is proof that persistent infection can exist in these patients because the one month treatment did not eradicate the infection.

Indeed, many chronically ill patients, whom these physicians dismissed, have gone on to respond positively and even recover, when additional antibiotics are given.

It is interesting that these individuals who promote this so called "post-Lyme syndrome" as a form of arthritis, depend on funding from arthritis groups and agencies to earn their livelihood. Some of them are known to have received large consulting fees from insurance companies to advise them to curtail coverage for any antibiotic therapy beyond this arbitrary 30 day cutoff, even if the patient will suffer. This is despite the fact that additional therapy may be beneficial, and despite the fact that such practices never occur in treating other diseases.

Following the lead of this group of physicians, a few state health departments have even begun to investigate, in a very threatening way, physicians who have more liberal views on Lyme disease diagnosis and treatment than they do. Indeed, I must confess that I feel that I am taking a large personal risk here today by publicly stating these views, for fear that I may suffer some negative repercussions, despite the fact that many hundreds of physicians and many thousands of patients all over the world agree with what I am saying here. Because of this bias by this inner circle, Lyme disease is both underdiagnosed and undertreated, to the great detriment to many of our citizens. Let me address these points in more detail.

UNDERDIAGNOSIS

1. Under reporting: The current reporting criteria for Lyme are inadequate and miss an estimated 30 to 50% of patients. Some states curtailed their active surveillance programs and saw an artificial drop in reported cases of nearly 40%, leading the uninformed to believe incorrectly that the number of new cases of Lyme is on the decline. The reporting procedure is often so cumbersome, many physicians never bother to report cases. Some physicians have found themselves the target of state health department investigators. Finally, to many physicians and government agents rely on the notoriously unreliable serologic blood test to confirm the diagnosis.

2. Poor Lyme disease diagnostic testing: It is very well-known that the serologic blood test for Lyme is insensitive, inaccurate, not standardized, and misses up to 40 percent of cases, yet many physicians, including many of those referred to above, and the senior staff at CDC and NIH, insist that if the blood test is negative, then the patient could not possibly have Lyme. This view is not supported by the facts. Lyme is diagnosed clinically, and can exist even when the blood test is negative.

The Rocky Mountain Lab of the NIH, which is the country's best government laboratory for Lyme research had developed an excellent diagnostic test for this illness nearly 4 years ago, yet further work on it has been stalled due to lack of funding. Incredibly, if not for private donations of just $5,000 from the non-profit National Lyme Disease Foundation headquartered in Connecticut, then this reaseach would have had to be abandoned. An additional $30,000 was donated by this organization to allow them to continue other valuable projects relating to vaccine development and disease pathogenesis. Yet, many physicians believe that thousands of dollars of grant moneys awarded by the government to other, outside researchers is poorly directed, supporting work of low relevance and low priority to those sick with Lyme. In spite of this, their funding continues, and the Rocky Mountain Lab is still underfunded.

3. The university and Government based Lyme establishment deny the existence of atypical presentations of Lyme and patients in this category are not being diagnosed or treated, and have no place to go for proper care.

RESULTS: Some Lyme patients have had to see, as many as 42 different physicians often over several years, and at tremendous cost, before being properly diagnosed. Unfortunately, the disease was left to progress during that time, and patients were left forever ill, for by that time, their illness was not able to be cured. Even more disturbing, these hard line physicians have tried to dismiss these patients as having "Lyme Hysteria" and tried to claim they all were suffering from psychiatric problems!

UNDERTREATMENT

1. Because the diagnosis is not being made, for reasons partly outlined above.

2. University based and government endorsed treatment protocols are empiric, insufficient, refer to studies involving inadequate animal models, and are ignorant of basic pharmacology. They are not based on honest systematic studies or on the results of newer information.

3. After short courses of treatment, patients with advanced disease rarely return to normal, yet many can be proven to still be infected and can often respond to further antibiotic therapy. Unfortunately, Lyme patients are being denied such therapy for political reasons and/or because insurance companies refuse to pay for longer treatment, upon the arbitrary and uninformed advice of these physicians, who are on the insurance company's payroll.

4. Long term studies on patients who were untreated or undertreated demonstrated the occurrence of severe illness more than a decade later, reminiscent of the findings of the notorious Tuskeege Study, in which intentionally untreated syphilis patients were allowed to suffer permanent and in some cases fatal sequelae.

5. The Lyme bacterium spreads to areas of the body that render this organism resistant to being killed by the immune system and by antibiotics, such as in the eye, deep within tendons, and within cells. The Lyme bacterium also has a very complex life cycle that renders it resistant to simple treatment strategies. Therefore, to be effective, antibiotics must be given in generous doses over several months, until signs of active infection have cleared. Because relapses have appeared long after seemingly adequate therapy, long term followup, measured in years or decades, is required before any treatment regimen is deemed adequate or curative.

6. When administered by skilled clinicians, the safety of long term antibiotic therapy has been firmly established.

The very existence of hundreds of Lyme support groups in this country, and the tens of thousands of dissatisfied, mistreated and ill patients whom these groups represent, underscores the many problems that exist out in the real world of Lyme disease. I ask and plead with you to hear their voices, listen to their stories, and work in an honest and unbiased way to help and protect the many Americans whose health is at risk from what now has become a political disease. Thank you."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By: Joseph J. Burrascano, Jr., M.D.
139 Springs Fireplace Road
East Hampton, NY 11937

--------------------
There is no wealth but life.
-John Ruskin

All truth goes through 3 stages: first it is ridiculed: then it is violently opposed: finally it is accepted as self evident. - Schopenhauer

Posts: 5639 | From Aptos CA USA | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
CaliforniaLyme
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 7136

Icon 1 posted      Profile for CaliforniaLyme     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This is Doc B- being interviewed-
he is a sweetie-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjjuC66g9lw&eurl=http://planetthrive.com/cgi-bin/members/pub9990215723938.cgi?itemid=9990267119053&action=viewad&categoryid=9970258

--------------------
There is no wealth but life.
-John Ruskin

All truth goes through 3 stages: first it is ridiculed: then it is violently opposed: finally it is accepted as self evident. - Schopenhauer

Posts: 5639 | From Aptos CA USA | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Nori
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8983

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Nori     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
California Lyme
I spent a lot of time in the Forest of Nisene Marks state park mountain biking when I lived in CA. I remember seeing the trees snapped off at the top and the rips in the earth from the violence of the Loma Prieta quake at the epicenter there.

It gives me the creeps to know that is such a hot spot for lyme.

--------------------
Nori

Posts: 109 | From Virginia | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
CaliforniaLyme
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 7136

Icon 1 posted      Profile for CaliforniaLyme     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
NORI!!!! In 2003 San Jose State Entomology published a study showing that Nisene Mark State Park is highest in all of CA for Lyme % in adult ticks.

Do you know about the disparate rates between nymphs and adults in CA? It is because of the Western Fence lizard. The nymphs that feed on lizards will be uninfected as adults- so the adult rate is always dramtically smaller!!! For years they ahad only done adult studies and thought the nymphs were low too but they didn't realize what was going on!!!

So in Mendocino where the adult rate was 5% the nymphal rate was 41%

NORI-
in Nisene Mark State Park the ADULT RATE is 17.8%
(there is also HME!! I got it!)

so if

adult 5% = 41% nymphal

then

adult 17.8% = ____% nymphal

If it was the same ratio we are looking at 100% infection rates in nymphs!!! Who KNOWS how high it is but it is astronomically high!! They have never DONE a nymphal tick study in NIsene!!!

So yes, you spent time in the #1 hotspot in all of CA for Lyme disease- and it is wicked here.
Lots of MS presentations, lots of neuro stuff,
fibromyalgia, CFS etc-

We have nasty Babs here too- you know we have the WA1 in CA so you could have tested negative on standard Babs tests because of that!!! And most of us have Ehrlichiosis around here, too!!
We have HGE & HME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We have so many support group members who used to be joggers or bikers at Nisene!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Welcome to the club*)!*)!*)!*)!*!)

Do you ever come to town? If so stop by our support group- the 4th Thursday of the month!*)&*!)

Want to hear a funny story? The epicenter of Loma Prieta, yes, for you folks that don't know, The BIG ONE, that big california earthquake 17 years back- was centered in the same park-

EXCEPT Nori- the Rangers got so tired of people tramping the path to the epicenter back then- that they used to move the sign all the time- by 100 yards or more!!! (so it was a transient epicenter*)!*)! not a real one*)!

Yup, that's Nisene.

Nice to meet you*)!*)! It wasn't you, I suppose?
Who posted that little note??? I really would love to meet who it was!!!
Sincerely,
Sarah

--------------------
There is no wealth but life.
-John Ruskin

All truth goes through 3 stages: first it is ridiculed: then it is violently opposed: finally it is accepted as self evident. - Schopenhauer

Posts: 5639 | From Aptos CA USA | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by CaliforniaLyme:
Dr. B's Treatment Guidelines are the main protocol used by ILADS. Dr. B is hands down the best Lyme doctor in the world. !

I agree.

I THOUGHT Brooke made the comment that the dr who put her in remission lost his license???

Maybe she meant "almost" lost his license?? or is my memory failing me once again!?

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96222 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.