nefferdun
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 20157
posted
I am confused with the discussions about these two devices. They sound similar. Are they the same? Is one better than the other? More expensive or something?
Do these work well on co-infections? I have not had a borellia flare in two years. My symptoms are bart and babesia.
Is it hard to figure out? I can not concentrate to learn new things about technology.
I have a mouth full of amalgams. Will this not work if I can't remove them? Thanks
-------------------- old joke: idiopathic means the patient is pathological and the the doctor is an idiot Posts: 4676 | From western Montana | Registered: Apr 2009
| IP: Logged |
Brussels
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 13480
posted
Pe1 about 1600 dollars, about 10 times stronger than LW.
LW about 300 dollars, but seems to work a bit.
They work on bart, but I don't know about babesia. I think it does NOT help babesia, but the thought is: once borrelia goes dormant, babesia symptoms become less strong.
Very easy to use, at least my PE1.
Amalgams is not good in any case with any protocol, as these are so toxic. Infrared will move heavy metals.
But dr. W would treat people with amalgams, I suppose?
I would take them off, as soon as possible, no matter what treatment I choose...
Sorry you have to deal with so many issues!
Posts: 6199 | From Brussels | Registered: Oct 2007
| IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/