LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » CD-57 Test / Values

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: CD-57 Test / Values
bcb1200
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 25745

Icon 1 posted      Profile for bcb1200     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi folks: A few quesitons today (different threads for each.)

My LLMD took blood for a CD-57 test. I understand that it is a good indicator as to a)How badly you have Lyme and b)likelihood of remission once treatment is complete.

I am told that
<60 indicates Chronic Lyme
60-100 indicates Lyme
>130 indicates recovery from Lyme and remission possible
>200 normal. remission unlikely.

Does this jive with what other's have found? Just curious what your CD-57 values are.

I don't have mine yet, but will post as soon as I know. Hoping I"m close to 100, but not sure.

--------------------
Bite date ?
2/10 symptoms began
5/10 dx'd, after 3 months numerous test and doctors

IgM Igenex +/CDC +
+ 23/25, 30, 31, 34, 41, 83/93

Currently on:

Currently at around 95% +/- most days.

Posts: 3134 | From Massachusetts | Registered: May 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Florence1
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 22960

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Florence1     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
mine was 28 and I have the same values as you posted......good luck...............

--------------------
Oct 09 Positive CDC Western Blot
Jan 10 Positive Babesia Duncani
Jan 10 Cd57 28
Mar 10 EBV, IgM, IgG
HHV-6 IgG

Posts: 739 | From NC | Registered: Oct 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bcb1200
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 25745

Icon 1 posted      Profile for bcb1200     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Have others who have or are nearly recovered showed an increase in CD-57.

For those in remission and 100% off drugs...what is your CD-57?

I'm feeling better about my LLMD here in Mass the more I learn about her. Very glad she did this test.

Florence...what do you meant he same values I posted?

--------------------
Bite date ?
2/10 symptoms began
5/10 dx'd, after 3 months numerous test and doctors

IgM Igenex +/CDC +
+ 23/25, 30, 31, 34, 41, 83/93

Currently on:

Currently at around 95% +/- most days.

Posts: 3134 | From Massachusetts | Registered: May 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Florence1
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 22960

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Florence1     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
like you wrote <60 chronic lyme, >200 remission likely...etc etc.....from the information i have gained the vlaues you quoted where what I understood to be correct.......there is lots of posts on cd 57 if you do a search you will see peoples opinions on the tests and wether it correlates to how they are feeling......

--------------------
Oct 09 Positive CDC Western Blot
Jan 10 Positive Babesia Duncani
Jan 10 Cd57 28
Mar 10 EBV, IgM, IgG
HHV-6 IgG

Posts: 739 | From NC | Registered: Oct 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yes, do a search here.. you will find tons of people with HIGH CD57's who feel horrible and then some with low CD57's who are well, or almost well.

Makes no sense to me. Not valid in my humble opinion after what I've read here over the years.

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96223 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kday
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 22234

Icon 1 posted      Profile for kday     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Perhaps those with high CD57's have some type of co-infection causing it, or are misdiagnosed with Lyme. Maybe some have a different strain of borellia where that subset of natural killer cells remains normal?

As I understand, a low CD57 generally indicates illness, but who's to say someone with a low CD57 can't feel well? They may still have borellia suppressing CD57, but is it unreasonable to think that even though these people still have borellia, they can feel well anyway? Just because you have the causative borellia doesn't mean you have Lyme Disease.

I think once the CD57 is above 60, the levels are used to predict the likelihood of relapse. If you are above 60, and still feeling bad, perhaps you are experiencing symptoms of a co-infection, toxic overload, or simply side effects from long-term antibiotics. I'm not saying CD57 is a perfect test by any means, and maybe in the end it's not a good test, but I think many misunderstand its purpose.

I don't think CD57 is as black and white as many of us want it to be. Perhaps there will be a better indicator in the future to determine wellness.

Posts: 967 | From A deserted island without internet access | Registered: Sep 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
terri3boys
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 12993

Icon 1 posted      Profile for terri3boys     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Is the "Natural Killer Cell Surface Ag." the same? It says that, along with "Ab NK (CD56/16)" and then "% NK (CD56/16)".

If so, according to the reference range posted above, I think I may be in pretty good shape. I don't know what it means if you've been in ALL of those reference ranges, like I have...........

However, why would I continue to come back with random Lyme bands? Sometimes it's just a couple of IgG bands and/or an IgM band.

This last western blot came back showing:

IgG 41 (present/abnormal)
IgG 18 (present/abnormal)

IgM 41 (present/abnormal)

It seems like the IgG bands that have been showing up keep getting "lower" on the scale, and ones that I haven't had show up before.

Like Band 23, now Band 18 ---- IgG. As far as the IgM, it always fluctuates among all 3 --- 41, 39 and 23. Never 2 IgM bands show up at the same time.

In the IgG category, it runs the gammit: I think I've had all bands show up at different times, from 4 at a time to just 1. I've had all of them show up now at one time or another, except for Band 93.

I don't know what to make of that! I haven't been on abx for tx of Lyme for about 2 years. The last abx tornado was the 2.5 months of 6 different abx, plus a steroid shot to get me over what ended up to be a sinus infection that almost cost me my voice box.

That was hell. What my doctors want to concentrate on at this point is my VIRUS "SOUP!" I need to deal with the EBV, HHV-6, CMV, CPn, and I can't remember what else has decided to come join the party..........

I need to order that XMRV (or whatever it's called) test. My doctor wanted me to do that back whenever that report was released, but didn't want me to pay the approx. $700 it cost then.

She wanted me to wait until insurance covered it, which should be right around now. I need to check. I'm due to go back in anyway.

Any input is greatly appreciated!

terri3boys

Posts: 268 | From Texas | Registered: Aug 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bcb1200
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 25745

Icon 1 posted      Profile for bcb1200     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi all...coincidentally, my doc called with my CD-57 results today. I was 84. While not great, at least I am above 60!

Terri3boys...what do EBV, HHV-G, CMV, and CPn stand for?

--------------------
Bite date ?
2/10 symptoms began
5/10 dx'd, after 3 months numerous test and doctors

IgM Igenex +/CDC +
+ 23/25, 30, 31, 34, 41, 83/93

Currently on:

Currently at around 95% +/- most days.

Posts: 3134 | From Massachusetts | Registered: May 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jkmom
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 14004

Icon 1 posted      Profile for jkmom     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I had a few symptoms I recognized as Lyme since my daughter is pretty sick. I've been on abx for 20 months and on the abx, I feel like a well person. If I stop taking them, my mild symptoms come back quickly.

My CD57 was 27 about a year ago and is 36 now. I was shocked that it was so low the first time since I don't feel very sick. But the fact is, my symptoms do come back quickly off from abx. I am not sure what to think about this test.

Posts: 984 | From US | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
jk... been treated for coinfections yet? Lyme is usually slow to come back .. so you could have coinfections.

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96223 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jkmom
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 14004

Icon 1 posted      Profile for jkmom     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I have been treated for bart with Levaquin. Zithromax and biaxin get rid of my symptoms almost completely within a few days of starting them. Doxy is like being on nothing for me. My theory is that I have bart still but this CD57 test, if accurate, indicates active Lyme.

I am not convinced that I have been aggressive enough with my treatment though. I have an appointment with a new LLMD next Friday to discuss more treatment. I know she hits hard with lots of abx and treats for coinfections, too.

Posts: 984 | From US | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JunkYardWily
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 24271

Icon 1 posted      Profile for JunkYardWily     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
i wasnt going to bring up my score but since were on the topic i just got tested and it was 160. is this good or bad? at first i was excited but now i have been feeling so poorly lately that i wonder if its good or not. im pretty sure i have lyme as i had 3 bands +.

--------------------
sick since 9-09
igg, 18,23,41 reactive
igm, 41 reactive

Posts: 436 | From Kansas City | Registered: Jan 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bcb1200
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 25745

Icon 1 posted      Profile for bcb1200     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well, you are below normal (200), but that is really good. what this may mean is you have Lyme, but the co-infections are causing most of your problems.

Co-infections don't affect CD57 scores.

--------------------
Bite date ?
2/10 symptoms began
5/10 dx'd, after 3 months numerous test and doctors

IgM Igenex +/CDC +
+ 23/25, 30, 31, 34, 41, 83/93

Currently on:

Currently at around 95% +/- most days.

Posts: 3134 | From Massachusetts | Registered: May 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kateaton
Member
Member # 24871

Icon 1 posted      Profile for kateaton     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
does anyone know if the CD57 values are relevant for small children? My dr. wasn't sure and said that kids immune systems can be different.
Posts: 98 | From NH | Registered: Mar 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tallahasseeborrelia
Member
Member # 13828

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Tallahasseeborrelia     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Dr. Burrascano (he was my doc) says that the CD 57 is not for children, only adults.

Also my CD 57 was 80 in 2005, when I was first diagnosed with Lyme, but then I relapsed badly in 2008.

In 2006, after several months of treatment by Dr. B., I was able to work a full time demanding job, work-out three days a week and have a social life.

But since the relapse, going on two years now, I am so much worse than the first time. I have fatigue that I didn't have before.

I see Dr. C in Tampa since my relapse and he put me on IV Rocephin for 4 months, which helped a lot with the fatigue, but not so much with the horrible joint pain and stiffness in my legs.

I should mention that I was co-infected with Bartonella and my second doc (Dr. M in NYC) believes that since my CD 57 was high for someone so ill, that Bartonella did more damage to me than the Lyme.

No one knows for sure if I still have Bartonella or not. Little is known about it and Dr. B. said that it was very difficult to treat.

I also have severe neurological damage, including something called Transverse Myelitis, which has caused me to have foot drop in my right foot.

Needless to say, I have to use a walker to get around.

My point is that even though my CD 57 was 80, I still relapsed pretty badly and am now not able to work.

Every step I take is almost like climbing a mountain. But, I am still going to fight it because I want to get better.

Posts: 27 | From Tallahassee, FL | Registered: Nov 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
baileypup
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 22824

Icon 1 posted      Profile for baileypup     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I posted this on another thread recently.

At a lyme conference a few weeks ago, Dr. B said that the best indication of remission was the CD-57 test, and a good range is 120-157. He said most lyme patients start out in the 20-40 range,and 60 is good.

Tallahassee, you story is disheartening. Hopefully you can find your way back to good health again soon.

Posts: 964 | From san diego | Registered: Oct 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
stephfino
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 23599

Icon 1 posted      Profile for stephfino     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Don't different labs have different ranges of what they consider normal??

I use labcorp. Their reference interval for the normal range of % CD8-/Cd7 is 2-17
and
abs.CD8-CD57 reference interval is 60-360.

Are you saying that if the score is not over 130 then remission is not possible??

Where can you read more about this test??

Posts: 160 | From NJ | Registered: Dec 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bcb1200
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 25745

Icon 1 posted      Profile for bcb1200     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Tallahasee...what was your score after treatment? I know you said you started at 80, but do you konw where you ended? Also...did you get reinfected, or did you just have a relapse?

--------------------
Bite date ?
2/10 symptoms began
5/10 dx'd, after 3 months numerous test and doctors

IgM Igenex +/CDC +
+ 23/25, 30, 31, 34, 41, 83/93

Currently on:

Currently at around 95% +/- most days.

Posts: 3134 | From Massachusetts | Registered: May 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tracy9
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7521

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Tracy9         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Mine jives.

A year and a half ago, I was 32. Now I'm 120. My IGENEX test, each time I get it, has less and less bands, and just came out negative for the first time (though still a couple key bands.)

My Lyme symptoms are better. I am sicker than ever, however it is clearly Bartonella and the resultant autoimmune disease I've developed, small fiber neuropathy.

But I've given Lyme a good kick in the teeth. This is great news.

My Bart titers are very, very high, and I test positive on skin biopsy for small fiber neuropathy.

So I think I have plenty of objective evidence that my Lyme Disease has gotten a lot better, and that even though I am bedridden and very sick, it ain't the Lyme right now!

--------------------
NO PM; CONTACT: [email protected]

13 years Lyme & Co.; Small Fiber Neuropathy; Myasthenia Gravis, Adrenal Insufficiency. On chemo for 2 1/2 years as experimental treatment for MG.

Posts: 4480 | From Northeastern Connecticut | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
canefan17
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 22149

Icon 1 posted      Profile for canefan17     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
CD 57 is hogwash

Means nada imo

Posts: 5394 | From Houston, Tx | Registered: Aug 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.