LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

This topic has been moved to General Support.     next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Dr. W update - from TX Medical Board

   
Author Topic: Dr. W update - from TX Medical Board
kday
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 22234

Icon 1 posted      Profile for kday     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dr. W, TX

On August 27, 2010, the Board and Dr. W, entered into an Agreed Order requiring Dr. W to complete within one year 15 hours of CME including 10 hours in Lyme disease (coursework must be sponsored by the Infectious Disease Society of America) and five hours in ethics; and pay an administrative penalty of $2,000 within 60 days. The Order was based upon Dr. W's failure to meet the standard of care in the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease for one patient; nontherapeutic prescribing to the Patient; and his unprofessional conduct of receiving a percentage of profits for a vitamin supplement that he recommended the Patient purchase during her treatment.

http://stage.tmb.state.tx.us/news/press/2010/090210.php

------------

I personally heard a slightly different story. I heard that an ID Dr. actually turned him in, as apposed the the patient. I don't think the TMB is letting out the full truth (unethical?).

I'm glad he was ethical and didn't complete any IDSA coursework. It's interesting that he decided to retire instead.

And he wasn't exactly a supplement profiteer. I got 0 supplements from him, but it would have been nice if he sold them in his office.

** edited to remove doctor's name and city **

[ 09-02-2010, 07:05 PM: Message edited by: sixgoofykids ]

Posts: 967 | From A deserted island without internet access | Registered: Sep 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kday
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 22234

Icon 1 posted      Profile for kday     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I meant to post this in general.
Posts: 967 | From A deserted island without internet access | Registered: Sep 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
onbam
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post 
It sounded like as long as he's come up with the money and given the BS they wanted to hear, he could've gone right on treating.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Keebler
Honored Contributor (25K+ posts)
Member # 12673

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Keebler     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
-
Oh, this is so terrible that the IDSA has become the dark force that it has.

I wish the IDSA doctors had to complete ILADS seminars.
-

Posts: 48021 | From Tree House | Registered: Jul 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kday
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 22234

Icon 1 posted      Profile for kday     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I personally would make them read Lida H. Mattman's book so they have a correct understanding on bacteriology first.

Cell Wall Deficient Forms: Stealth Pathogens

http://www.amazon.com/Cell-Wall-Deficient-FormsStealth-Pathogens/dp/0849387671/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1283466086&sr=8-1

Posts: 967 | From A deserted island without internet access | Registered: Sep 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
randibear
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 11290

Icon 1 posted      Profile for randibear     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
never did he even approach me about any supplements. i didn't even see them advertised.

i still think there is something screwy about this.

they wanted a good llyme doctor out of business and they succeeded.

and unfortunately some lyme patient went along with it.

--------------------
do not look back when the only course is forward

Posts: 12262 | From texas | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Keebler
Honored Contributor (25K+ posts)
Member # 12673

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Keebler     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
-
My ND sells supplements but she makes no money other than her stocking fee and delivery charges. She also has to pay in advance and keep a stocked supply. The interest alone on her charge card is more than she recovers for the the convenience of our having products she has researched and examined to be top quality.

Still, a reasonable fair market price would be legal if she sold for the same amount as what I would have to pay if I got at another place. It's about fair market price. Many MDs get a cut or a bonus for prescribing lots of Rx.

I sure hope the husband who started this trouble by battling his wife over her treatment is happy with himself. He's not only ruined it for his wife, others in that area but for others, everywhere.

IDSA's crushing power is reigning down across the land. Bit by bit. Unhappy husbands are sure helping them, it seems. Time after time, that seems to be what starts trouble for so many LLMDs. A spouse does not want to get educated enough to understand &/or despises a life partner so much that to literally cut off all chances for treatment.

I have to say that were I to be a LLMD in this climate, I would quit. I would just quit.
-

Posts: 48021 | From Tree House | Registered: Jul 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Paul Mall
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 27581

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Paul Mall   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
that penalty does not sound very harsh unless they were going to continue to harass him

I disagree with it but it seems he should have just kept on going

Paul

Posts: 925 | From Connecticut | Registered: Aug 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sixgoofykids
Moderator
Member # 11141

Icon 1 posted      Profile for sixgoofykids   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Doctors have done worse things for lesser penalties ....

Moving to general support.

--------------------
sixgoofykids.blogspot.com

Posts: 13449 | From Ohio | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.