posted
why
Posts: 303 | From green bay, wi | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged |
TerryK
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 8552
posted
The NIAID is in alignment with IDSA whose studies are often bogus. Look at Allison DeLongs work for the hearing last July to see how they fudged data to get the results they wanted. There were many many holes in the studies that the IDSA uses. One example: in some cases lyme patients would need to perform better than the average population in order to be considered a success.
This one scares me. What will they be able to trump up in order to take away treatment?
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Ceftriaxone and Doxycycline in the Treatment of Patients With Seropositive Chronic Lyme Disease
There is another one just like it for seronegative lyme.
Terry
Posts: 6282 | From Oregon | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
onbam
Unregistered
posted
Nothing the government is doing at this point is going to help us. Their agenda is to disappear CLD, and it would be good if nobody enrolled in these trials.
IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/