LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Most accurate testing - esp. for coinfections

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Most accurate testing - esp. for coinfections
mojo
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 9309

Icon 1 posted      Profile for mojo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I've had Igenex tests but after a few years of treatment with no remission (but a lot of improvement) I'd like to retest - especially for co-infections.

Cost isn't an issue - I figure I've already invested a fortune - best to know exactly what I need to hit hard.

Thanks for your help.

Posts: 1761 | From USA | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tickle
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 36441

Icon 1 posted      Profile for tickle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It's a good idea to do a full confection workup - lyme that doesn't resolve is quite likely being hindered by at least one co.
Posts: 161 | From vancouver island | Registered: Feb 2012  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sk8ter
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8671

Icon 1 posted      Profile for sk8ter     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Galaxy for bart...
Posts: 871 | From orange county, ca. | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
seibertneurolyme
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 6416

Icon 1 posted      Profile for seibertneurolyme     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hubby has been extremely disappointed with his most recent round of testing.

You don't say if you plan to go off antibiotics prior to testing or not? That would make a big difference in both results and also which tests are available.

Hubby went off meds for 50 days (30 days minimum is suggested by many labs) and then the plan was to do a 7 day antibiotic challenge and wait 3 days to retest. He got so sick (ER and hospitalization) when he added back meds that he was not able to stop the meds for 3 days -- he just stayed on the meds and kept adding more. He went ahead and did the tests and results were not impressive.

The theory is that if you stop meds then you should be able to culture pathogens easier. Also the med challenge should cause your body to produce antibodies for those type of tests. And the antibiotics should kill some pathogens so PCR results will have more DNA available.

Galaxy Lab is probably the number one choice for bart testing -- but must be off meds for the culture to be valid. Hubby did not do this test as bart does not seem to be his major infection.

Advanced Labs does a culture test for lyme -- but again must be off meds. Hubby did not do this test either -- thought it was a waste of money since it is highly unlikely his lyme is gone. Also not sure if the test is valid for the European strains which is what he probably has based on other tests.

Fry Labs for FL1953 -- does stains and PCR. Hubby did not do this test -- does not think he has this pathogen.

ECP test for babesia -- hubby's test results were invalid as the day hubby repeated the test after antibiotic/antimalarial/antiparasitic treatment he had zero eosinophils so the 2nd (challenge) test could not show an increase in ECP. Also the lab has recently changed their test ranges -- need higher numbers to get a positive (abnormal) test.

Bloodslide from Clongen -- one of the best tests for unknown pathogens. Hubby did still show coccobacilli attacking his WBC's but on this particular test babesia and his unknown dumbbell parasite were not visible.

Phase contrast microscopy of live blood cells -- the 2nd best test (after Clongen) in my opinion. Showed ring forms of babesia, low level of coccobacilli (probably bart), dumbbell parasite, and l-forms of lyme. Test results depend greatly on the experience of the technician and the amount of time spent looking at the blood -- 45 minutes in hubby's case.

SpiroStat Labs -- very disappointing test results. Lab does PCR testing for supposedly all 70 known insect borne pathogens. Hubby did the lyme panel (includes much more than just lyme) and the babesia panels each 2 times -- using both venous and capillary blood.

A total waste of $975. The lab found zero pathogens -- despite results of Clongen and phase contrast microscope above. After ordering the test found out that if unknown pathogens are discovered the lab is legally not allowed to tell the patient or doctor of those discoveries.

LabCorp results for rickettia and RMSF and ehrlichia and anaplasma -- antibody levels have fluctuated so much for hubby since last summer that results are confusing to say the least.

LabCorp antibody test for babesia duncani (WA1) -- send out to Focus Technologies. Currently hubby's results are negative (<256) even though he has responded to restarting babesia meds and the blood smear results from the microscopy above.

Then there is the immune based lyme test -- can't think of the lab name. Hubby has never done that test and I am doubtful that it would be positive since his CRP is only 2 or 4 most of the time.

One test that I do wish we had repeated -- the Immunoserology of Lyme Panel from Immunosciences Lab. Hubby had that done in 2007 I think it was. The lab was out of business for a couple of years but has restarted in the last year or so. That test looks for things that other labs do not test for.

Need to sign off now.

Bea Seibert

Posts: 7306 | From Martinsville,VA,USA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
mojo
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 9309

Icon 1 posted      Profile for mojo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Tks. I should have mentioned that I Rife and I haven't been on ABX for years.
Posts: 1761 | From USA | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.