posted
Yes, the article is more balanced. One of the points made by the article that struck me was the dearth of leadership in the Lyme community on our issues.
Do people agree?
Posts: 360 | From Massachusetts | Registered: Dec 2012
| IP: Logged |
Keebler
Honored Contributor (25K+ posts)
Member # 12673
posted
- Indeed. LymeDisease.org does a great job with education but they can't match the errors the IDSA perpetuates.
The problem with mass market media is that they tend to give automatic authority to the governement experts and they don't have time to really do their homework.
They also are often funded, quite largely, by the pharmaceutical and insurance industry, both of which are very much against the idea of treating chronic lyme, or even admitting its existence.
Journalists are also not so quick to believe patient reports and nearly always follow an patient account such with the idiot (IDSA) "exerpts" that discount, rather than discuss with those who are really doing the work with lyme (ILADS).
FOR ANYONE NEW TO LYME: IMPORTANT TO KNOW
that, while many good points are raised, Specter also has many very serious errors here that could cost someone years of suffering, or even cost lives.
See the comments on the NPR link from Specter's interview about his article. Just keeping both links together here for easy reference:
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/