posted
Well, I know that after I got chronic Lyme I had no more children, although I wanted more, I was too sick. And now I am glad I did not, because science has proven that Lyme is transmitted from mother to child in utero.
poppy
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 5355
posted
Watch out for black helicopters.
Posts: 2888 | From USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
Lymedin2010
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 34322
posted
Maybe it is not a depopulation agenda, since big pharma & the big corps need the people to generate an ever greedy need for profit.
How about this scenario, which seems logically profitable & it would be something I would implement if I was a money grubbing corporate greed'r lobbying, vying & colluding with the gov for self interest.
1) Inoculate children with disease ridden & chemically laden vaccines that may not always have an impact until middle age.
2) Taint foods & care products with chemicals & pesticides in trace amounts, whereby they have an accumulate effect over your life span. Mix up an assortment of trace contaminants in numerous products to make it difficult to trace & implicate.
3) Promote higher education (Billion dollar revenue) to squeeze back your future earning early on. Facilitate the banks, real estate, car manufacturers, and other corporations in further whittling down your worth and maximizing their worth & gain.
4) Deny, hide & conceal all chronic health conditions, as they are too profitable. Resolve health issues that have a high death incidence rate, because you are needed as part of the machinery. Hope that all of the above will eliminate you before the age of 65, because then you become too much of a financial burden.
Eliminate your stake on social security & your drain on health care as close to 65 as possible, but even if you leave after 40 there is always someone new to perpetuate the loop.
Posts: 2087 | From NY | Registered: Oct 2011
| IP: Logged |
Yes-- a population reduction agenda would just introduce agents that kill-- like Ebola or AIDS-- you're right that Lyme is not a population reduction weapon-- (although women with chronic Lyme may have less children, and the children they do have may be infected and thus sickly..) Lyme also puts strain on families -- which is an objective of the elite, since weakened families are easier to manipulate and control.
Keeping people chronically ill (Lyme, diabetes, etc) generates enormous profits for the pharmaceutical companies, which are in large part owned by the banking elite. This is why they maybe do not want to promote a sensitive Lyme test. They want to under estimate the epidemic.
The banking elite make huge sums off of government deficits (bonds finance the deficits)--- which occur where there is endless war( weapons cost a lot of money), and also when disabled people or chronically ill people receive government benefits..
Thanks for your perspective-- I like your thinking.
So its a win-win for them-- and a "lose-lose" for us.... No wonder the Chronic Lyme denialists are still out there in full force trying to manipulate education about Lyme. There is a lot of money involved.
Posts: 696 | From New York | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic