LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Explosive DNA probing work via microscopy

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Explosive DNA probing work via microscopy
Lymedin2010
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 34322

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymedin2010     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
There is explosive work being done now that has shown Borrelia DNA in Alzheimer's plaques, Borrelia biofilm in the blood of dementia patients & Borrelia in the blood of MS patients as well. The latter of which Borrelia was found despite 7 years of abx therapy.

Please donate & support Dr. Alan MacDonald's work, as it is coming toward the CDC like an unstoppable freight train. This is irrefutable evidence that will serve to vindicate the entire Lyme Disease community & lift the bondage's off of mysterious labeled diseases.


Great progress by Dr. Alan MacDonald & future DNA probing education.

https://www.gofundme.com/7tbbf5zw

"Antibody status is immaterial in DNA detection [BANR] procedures . Borrelia spirochetes which bind to Species specific DNA probes, directly visualize under the microscope, the borrelia spirochetes in the body of the
[BANR] patient."

"The equipment needed for each physician performing such testing after graduation from the tutorial is inexpensive and straightforward. It consists of a microscope. "

"Point of Care Methologies are now routinely available in many physician offices, and this campaign will expand the capabilities of individual physicians to, with a microscope in their private offices , to evaluate their own patients for DNA evidence of borrelia infections. This harkens back to the early 20th century, when every physician was trained in and equipped with a microscope and with the necessary reagents for staining bacteria ( Gram Staining) , to assist in diagnosis of infections their own patients."

Posts: 2087 | From NY | Registered: Oct 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
WakeUp
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 9977

Icon 1 posted      Profile for WakeUp     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
BUMPITY!!

EXCELLENT THREAD, THANK YOU LYMEDIN2010!!

DONATE TODAY!!

WE WILL EXPOSE THE TRUTH!!

WE WILL FIND A CURE!!

SUPPORT DR. MACDONALD TODAY!!

Posts: 696 | From New York | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
WakeUp
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 9977

Icon 1 posted      Profile for WakeUp     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I remember my pediatrician in the early 1960s-- he had a microscope in his office and he used it!!

The kids loved it.

No expensive patented and bogus blood tests were needed by this very capable and dedicated MD.

Many of these newer blood tests are expensive, innaccurate scams-- especially in the case of Lyme disease.

Anything approved by the CDC or FDA should be looked at with skepticism given the fact that these are captive organizations.

Posts: 696 | From New York | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
duncan
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 46242

Icon 1 posted      Profile for duncan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This is a great step forward, but without independent verification, or at least some meaningful traction in the press, it will likely go nowhere.

I worry that we're cheering our QB and we aren't even considered to be in the game...

It's simply not good enough what we believe.

Posts: 228 | From Unitied States | Registered: Jul 2015  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
WakeUp
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 9977

Icon 1 posted      Profile for WakeUp     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The press is controlled by the same psychopaths who "own" our medical establishment-- they stack the game rules in their favor --- but they cannot control scientific truth in this day and age of the internet..

Scientific truth always wins out in the end.

A simple microscope proves chronic infection, and they cannot outlaw microscopes.

Dr. MacDonald's results have been verified by Dr. Miklossy, and will no doubt be verified by many other researchers in the coming months and years.

We are the patients--- we ARE the game-- and there are hundreds of thousands more of us each year!!

Gandhi brought down the entire British empire with a spinning wheel and the truth.

The cat is out of the bag regarding borrelia biofilm, chronic infection, alzheimers and MS... the cat is not going back into that bag any time soon.

Posts: 696 | From New York | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
duncan
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 46242

Icon 1 posted      Profile for duncan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Truth and history both have a way of being defined by who ever is in power.

Miklossy's work is old news, and I am a fan of hers. She and MacDonald are it.

Nothing is changing.

These findings are important, maybe even landmark. But if they are not validated, and if they are not publicized repeatedly in mainstream press and peer-reviewed medical journals, then the efforts likely fall still-borne.

You want progress? Then we need to get real.

Posts: 228 | From Unitied States | Registered: Jul 2015  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.