LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Anyone heard of CeresNano labs?

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Anyone heard of CeresNano labs?
6Hypnone
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 47629

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 6Hypnone   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Someone messaged me in another forum, and it was actually having to do w/stabbing ear pain I had had a while ago..extremely painful. And she wrote me saying she was apparently told that could be caused by a systemic disease. So she got tested by "an unreliable lab called Igenex"..for Borrelia years ago. And that she's now relying on one called Ceres Nano. She is also being tested by Galaxy labs.

This is disturbing twofold b/c I never thought my stabbing ear pain was due to Borrelia (great-what else?) and 2, that she thinks Igenex is unreliable. Igenex apparently told her she had Borrelia and was treated w/antibiotics and it brought about a host of new problems.
Also said that Igenex has since revised their standards and that now, she would get a negative result.

Can anyone shed any light on this?

Posts: 606 | From sw suburbs of chicago, Illinois | Registered: Mar 2016  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TX Lyme Mom
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 3162

Icon 1 posted      Profile for TX Lyme Mom     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Ceres Nano Sciences Lab had a display booth at the 2015 ILADS Conf. and their presentation was featured in the plenary session during the conference. This new test is considered to be a major breakthrough in the diagnosis for early Lyme disease because it is a direct antigen capture test which uses a urinary sample vs. the older blood antibody-based test by Igenex.

http://www.ceresnano.com/#!nanotrap-lyme-test/c64d

It takes the body about six weeks to manufacture Lyme antibodies, whereas this newer test will be helpful in determining whether antibiotics are needed during the earliest days following a tick bite. (You might recall that Igenex used to offer the Lyme Urine Antigen Capture Test (LUAT), but it was withdrawn from the market many years ago.)

Although this new lab test is already FDA approved, ILADS doctors are encouraged (and probably required?) to submit their samples through the current president of ILADS, Dr. Samual Shor, for further data collection and analysis by ILADS. (I'm naming him because his name is posted openly on the ILADS website.)

Galaxy Lab offers the newest test for Bartonella. It is the result of many years of veterinary research since 1984 by Dr. Edward Breitschwerdt, DVM who has specialized in this disease at NC State Univ.

http://www.galaxydx.com/web/our-team/

Posts: 4563 | From TX | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TX Lyme Mom
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 3162

Icon 1 posted      Profile for TX Lyme Mom     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
PS - I forgot to mention that one of the advantages of this newest Lyme diagnostic test -- assuming that it will be validated by consensus of ILADS doctors following their on-going data collection and analysis of it -- is that this should help to bring Lyme disease into mainstream medicine.

Furthermore, and this is probably my most important point to emphasize is that several speakers at the 2015 ILADS Conf. stressed the importance of treating for a minimum of six weeks, instead of the previously typical one month of treatment, for any suspected case of early Lyme disease.

I honestly doubt that many, if any, infectious disease (ID-iot) doctors will comprehend the importance of longer treatment for early Lyme, but we can always hope and we can keep our fingers, eyes and toes crossed that they will do so.

Posts: 4563 | From TX | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.