half-way down -- Pence: “Indiana law requires all children be protected from vaccine-preventable diseases. . . and our administration strongly urges Hoosier families to have their children vaccinated.”
Good point, though, in that we need to know the stance by all those running for office - school boards & governments: local, county, state, federal.
And who has ties to pharmaceutical companies.
It also seems that the media is so tied to the pharmaceutical companies in this regard, too. They are "owned" in some ways by the sheer volume of commercials they accept.
---
I hope their editor corrects the title spelling for Philosophical. Still, content matters most, I suppose.
And, yes, it's a disturbing situation. Thanks for the head's up - and attention to the importance of this for everyone, everywhere.
This order to "see a state-licensed medical doctor first to receive such re-education"
and
". . . if this law were to pass, the government could make extremely risky medical decisions without parental consent. HB 564 allows school administrators to vaccinate children without parental consent, if officials deem it necessary.
The state is claiming ownership of children’s bodies, . . . " (end excerpt)
Sounds like a different kind of government altogether from the one I thought we stood for but what is equally concerning is the unwillingness to consider the truth of the matter regarding the additives, etc.
That's a terrible example for what education & even personal responsibility (to become educated in matter of one's own health) stands for, too. -
[ 07-24-2016, 02:59 PM: Message edited by: Keebler ]
Posts: 48021 | From Tree House | Registered: Jul 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
It all changed in 1986, when vaccine manufacturers won federal legal immunity from damage done by vaccines. Before then, the lawsuits for damage were expensive. With no or little liability, that's when the great increase in number of vaccines began.
Posts: 13116 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
Keebler
Honored Contributor (25K+ posts)
Member # 12673
posted
- Robin,
Oh, I see. I wondered why all this "force" started.
For anyone new to all this &/or new to lyme:
It's vital to become familiar with this material as many with lyme have experienced severe reactions - some long term - from certain vaccines, even flu shots.
CHILDREN WITH LYME are at particular risk if they are in a school that forces vaccines -- and some are also in schools that "deny" lyme or continued treatment (as if a child takes an Rx during school time, the staff knows). In some cases, school staff has called parents into question with the law regarding lyme protocol.
This can be very rough for parents to navigate.
Vaccines should never be administered to anyone who is dealing with any kind of infection in the first place. While the concept of vaccination certainly holds some merit - (for a few key diseases such as polio, tetanus, whooping cough and a few others), the number of vaccines has exploded to the detriment of many.
However, it's the very real issue of what all is in with that which seems to pose a great risk, the ingredients as well as the number & timing of these shots that truly bombard from the first day of birth for something like Hepatitis B when a baby is not at risk for that at all.
posted
And just to mention - here in CA a lawsuit was filed July 1 by 10 plaintiffs - both individuals and organizations - to overturn SB 277 so kids can go to school again without having to be vaccinated before kindergarten and the 7th grade.
Posts: 13116 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
Keebler
Honored Contributor (25K+ posts)
Member # 12673
posted
- Robin,
I really want to thank you for keeping us in tune with the happenings in this matter. This really matters so I'm glad you seem to have a handle on it & share with us. -
Posts: 48021 | From Tree House | Registered: Jul 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Thanks, Keebler, and yes, Lymetoo, the public is saying no and needs to continue to do so. We all know how vulnerable Lyme patients are, as well as everyone else!
Just heard a CA update today - there are up to 21 plaintiffs now in the lawsuit! It's a federal lawsuit because the issues are constitutional, and the eventual ruling will only affect CA.
A judge may issue an injunction in August, and if that happens, SB277, requiring mandatory vaccines in order to go to school, may not go into effect until there's a court hearing perhaps in a year's time.
Mentioning all this to let folks know you can fight back!
Posts: 13116 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic