I kind of view my hypercoagulation tests as a meter as to how I am doing in fighting this stuff or how overwhelmed with infection I am. As most of you know I have been in 85-95% remission for a few years now and stopped heparin for my hypercoagulation about 2 1/2 years ago and started Nattokinase for maintenance.
Got my hypercoagulation results yesterday and after 2 1/2 years of no heparin my hypercoagulation is still fully under control and well within normal ranges. It's actually exactlly where it was last time I was tested right after stopping heparin.
So the Natto does seem to work. I don't think that alone is the key, treating the infection was also a must, but having done both, things are looking good still.
I have been trying to use the Rechts Regulat and I have to saw, in my opinion the stuff is down right NASTY tasting. It isn't even as good as vinegar. I will finish my bottle, but since the Natto has been working, I'll stick with that.
Posted by Carol in PA (Member # 5338) on :
Jelly, Do you see any difference in results between the two products?
After big discussions about hypercoagulation a year and a half ago, I'm still taking Wobenzym, 12 tablets in the morning, on an empty stomach.
I keep thinking that I should order a bottle of Rechts Regulat, but I never "get around to it."
Heh, lots of things I never get around to.
Taking systemic enzyme therapy in the form of the Wobenzym has reduced my continuous headache both in frequency and intensity.
I told my family doctor I'm taking it, but he had no comment. I don't think he knows what systemic enzyme therapy is.
Anyways, I'd be interested in hearing if you have noticed any difference between the Natto and the Rechts Regulat.