I know Igenex is the best for WB. (oops! Thanks Betty for pointing out my faux pas) I know that MDL is the best for co-infections.
Went to new Ped for dd today. She is ordering WB, Elisa & PCR from MDL.
She said if test is neg., she doesn't really feel we need to worry about her.
For those who don't know - dd had pos 41 KDA IGG & 23 KDA IGM on crummy Quest WB, hubby & I disagree whether or not she has symptoms.
I'm wondering to what degree I should be fearing a false neg/pos test. Does anyone have thoughts on this?
I could also use some prayers for accuracy, if anybody can spare some. At least I know they're better than Quest, that does help to some degree.
Thanks!
Ali
[ 15. December 2006, 04:54 PM: Message edited by: AliG ]
Posted by bettyg (Member # 6147) on :
ali, prayers and hugs headed your way; boy, it's continual stress for you dear one!
ali, why aren't you using igenex?
i don't trust quest at all! sorry
Posted by lymedesign (Member # 8791) on :
I just got back another set of blood work from MDL today. All PCR's neg. for lyme and all co-infections. Also had tissues samples sent there from gastro surgery and all were neg. for lyme and co-infections.
The only test that shows lyme is Igenex WB.
MDL has always been neg. for us. Not that we want a positive, but we want an answer.
Posted by trails (Member # 1620) on :
my blood work for cos and for Lyme from MDL in 2001 and 2002 was positive.
I have had several surgeries and sent biopsies for PCR and never had a positive PCR. I am still waiting to hit the lottery on that one.
MDL found babs in my blood where Igenex did not.
I think they are a great lab for WB and coinfection testing. I wouldnt waste money on the PCR especially if it is blood.
good luck!
Posted by lymex5&counting (Member # 7202) on :