I think this would be good for people to do, write these publications, but be sure to pick the ones that trashed lyme patients. Not all these stories did that. For instance, Huffington Post just reported that Romney was raising the lyme issue in VA. It did not say anything about anti-science, etc.
So pick the ones that did wrong. You can figure that out by clicking on the link to the story to read it first.
I don't bother to reply to blogs. There are a million of them, and who reads them all? I did respond to the Mother Jones article before reading it, and afterwards found that I really could not fault it. So don't make my mistake and alienate reporters who actually did no harm.
Posted by lpkayak (Member # 5230) on :
thanks for that poppy. with my fog and current exhaustion i am really having trouble with the articles. a lot of "wrong" statements jump out at me...but much of it i cant really understand. i feel like some people make assumptions and they may be right but i dont see the connections.
so because of that i am not the one to write anything. but i do hope others who are doing better than me do.
maybe a statement will be made by phyllis giving us a framework.