LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » What to do if my initial Lyme test comes back "negative"

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: What to do if my initial Lyme test comes back "negative"
EyeBob
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 12572

Icon 1 posted      Profile for EyeBob     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I really think that I have Lyme. I have had a tick bite (no EM), and very, very strange symptoms matching many found here and elsewhere. I"ve had a pretty extensive workup, including blood work, MRI/MRA, etc.

If I was bit in January would one expect my IgG and IgM to come back positive if tested in June? Before I make the step to have more blood work drawn and use a specific lab like Ignenex, how often are false negative's encountered yet someone still has Lyme?

ONe more question. Thinking that I have Lyme, I started oral Doxy 3 weeks ago (400 mg/day). If I draw my blood work now, have I screwed up the readings?

I can provide more detail if desired. Let me know what you all think.

BT

Posts: 299 | From New Hampshire | Registered: Jul 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
treepatrol
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 4117

Icon 1 posted      Profile for treepatrol     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Treat by clinical symptoms dont worry about tests there falible for many reasons.Get a LLMD

--------------------
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
Remember Iam not a Doctor Just someone struggling like you with Tick Borne Diseases.

Newbie Links

Posts: 10564 | From PA Where the Creeks are Red | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tailz
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
That's what I'm worryied about. Will my equivocal malaria now come back negative because I took some of my Larium before I knew this?
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
chamade
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 11472

Icon 1 posted      Profile for chamade     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
My LLMD said that taking antibiotics will, if anything, increase the western blot positives.

All my Lyme tests came back negative, including the Igenex one...this according to CDC criteria. My Igenex test however was positive for specific Lyme bands (but not enough of them to make me officialy positive). This and my neurological problems(burning, tingling, twitching, eye pains etc.)was enough for my LLMD to say that I have Lyme 100% and start aggressive treatment.
Of course, all my MRIs etc. came back negative as well.

--------------------
Why me? Well, why not me???

Posts: 411 | From San Francisco, CA | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
groovy2
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 6304

Icon 1 posted      Profile for groovy2   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi Bob

The current tests for lyme are perty much
useless -- and cause much damage with
False Negatives--

My Tests came back IND -(Inditiminate)-
I was super sick at the time--

I had a Big bullseye on my leg weeks
before I got sick--

I had my tests done 17 yrs after infection-

I think tests are Most accurate a month
or so after infection and goes down
rapidly with time --Jay--

Posts: 2999 | From Austin tx USA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
EyeBob
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 12572

Icon 1 posted      Profile for EyeBob     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks all.

I was also wondering whether me starting myself on Doxy would affect a re-test. According to one post, it shouldn't.

Does anyone else know an answer to this?

I'm going to my PCP today and I'll ask her.

I need a LLMD, I'm going to get her opinion on that today too.

BT

Posts: 299 | From New Hampshire | Registered: Jul 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Michelle M
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7200

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Michelle M   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Heya Bob.

Your PCP won't know the answer.

Or worse -- they'll make something up to appear authoritative.

Here's the thing: Being on Doxy MIGHT be a good thing .. IgeneX Lab, the best there is, might recommend something called 'antibiotic priming...'

The idea is that really sick people frequently don't make antibodies. Also, borrelia burgdorferi is expert at evading the immune system. Thus, a false negative is not unlikely - especially in the initial, nearly-worthless ELISA.

However, enter the 'antibiotic challenge.'

A couple weeks of doxy will "prime" your immune system. Kill some spirochetes, and give your immune system the nudge. There is thereafter an increased likelihood of some b. burgdorferi antibodies in your blood at time of testing.

I've heard a regimen of about 10 days abx, followed by a week or two of none. Then test.

Clear as mud?

Also, you can call Nick Harris, the doc at IGeneX -- he'll give you his take on it. Extremely personable and smart guy. May I add he also likes to fly fish, so he can't be all bad?

Insist on using IGenex and doing a western blot. Your doctor will NOT know these things. However, that usually does not stop them from pretending to know.

Here's just how bad many of the typical lyme testing labs are. Are you feeling lucky? [Big Grin]


Michelle
_____________________________________________

"The first and most common test your doctor usually orders is an ELISA antibody test. Again, if the Lyme is hiding well or your immune system is fair, you will come up normal. Specifically, the ELISA test missed 56% of confirmed Lyme patients (Archives of Internal Medicine 15:761-0763, 1992).

In another study, it was in some ways worse. In this one the ELISA test missed over 70% of people with early Lyme disease, and 46% with late manifestations of Lyme. (Laboratory Medicine 21:299-304, 1990). Meaning, it missed 70 out of 100 people with the early disease. But it was still negative after the bug was in the body for a long time -- still missing 46 of 100 seriously infected people.
...

In one study, 55% of the labs could not accurately identify blood samples with Lyme, which led to the conclusion in a prestigious infection journal, that: screening tests for Lyme disease are not adequate (Journal of Clinical Microbiology 35:537-543, 1997).


But the routine Western Blot typically done has massive errors. In one serious test of the Lyme Western Blot testers, there was a stunning finding. They used nine clearly infected patients and sent their blood to 18 labs. Of the IgG type of antibody, some labs were wrong. They missed 10 of 18 samples. For the IgM type of antibody, the labs were occasionally so bad they falsely reported Lyme as absent in 16 of 18 samples (Arch Intern Med 150:761-763, 1990)."

(Excerpted from Dr. S article)

Posts: 3193 | From Northern California | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lymeladyinNY
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 10235

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lymeladyinNY     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi Bob, my nephew was on doxy just before getting his Igenex test. We asked the LLMD if that would mess up the test and she said, "No, keep taking it."

Hope that helps.

--------------------
I want to be free

Posts: 1170 | From Endicott, NY | Registered: Sep 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
If you were not tested through Igenex, your probability of a negative result is MUCH higher. Remember, as Michelle said, the LYME SPECIFIC bands are what is really important when a test comes back negative.

Most "regular" labs do NOT test for all the possible bands.

Read again what Michelle wrote and then read this:

Western Blot explanation:
http://tinyurl.com/ffn3x

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96222 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dguy
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8979

Icon 1 posted      Profile for dguy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
An apparently false negative threw me off course until I finally learned just how high the false negative percentage is on the "simple" (i.e. inexpensive) tests.

From what I can gather, PCR testing is generally considered to have the lowest rate of false negatives.

A revealing blood test you can do is for vitamin D ratios. The 1,25D to 25D ratio is typically elevated in those infected.

Posts: 727 | From USA | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lymebytes
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 11830

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lymebytes   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
No blood test including Igenex is 100% reliable. Lyme has and always should be based on clinical diagnosis, symptoms.

Many have had negative LD tests,yet still had Lyme.

One or 2 tubes of blood will not always catch the bacteria, it prefers the tissue anyway.

There are other tests Igenex can do. But if you know you have been bitten, EM rash, no test is necessary you need treatment.

--------------------
www.truthaboutlymedisease.com

Posts: 2003 | From endemic area | Registered: May 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
5dana8
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7935

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 5dana8   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Agree with all the above posters. Lyme is still a clinical diagnosis no matter what a duck may say.

Here's a link the explains how you can still have lyme & test negative for it:

http://www.anapsid.org/lyme/lymeseroneg.html

I was on many many months of 300mg doxy & used a cr@p lab (quest) and had lots of bands lite up omn my WB. Actually one band shy of CDC positive.

Treatment has made a big difference in my lyme disease. Can't really tell by my typing [Smile] but could not have typed this much (Almost 4000 posts) before my last treament. I had really horrible neuro lyme.

Hope this helps
Dana

--------------------
5dana8

Posts: 4432 | From some where over the rainbow | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.