posted
I am wondering if anyone who has read the new article found anything helpful - new information? any 'ah-ha' moments? Any clarification of questions?
Anneke
Posts: 364 | From California | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
CaliforniaLyme
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 7136
posted
Are you serious?
Um, when reading it my thoughts were X-rated because of language. I came up with some brand new obscenities I had never thought of before*)! That's about it*)!*)!!
-------------------- There is no wealth but life. -John Ruskin
All truth goes through 3 stages: first it is ridiculed: then it is violently opposed: finally it is accepted as self evident. - Schopenhauer Posts: 5639 | From Aptos CA USA | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
Greatcod
Unregistered
posted
It borders on the absurd..what they fail to mention, and it's almost criminal to leave it out, is that for the first 25 years, Steere's description of Lyme onset was so innaccurate that tens of thousands of cases went undiagnosed or misdiagnosed (as fibro, CFS). And their narrow definitions of neuroLyme make it all worse. If a college freshman turned in the article as a term paper, he would get an F.
IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic