LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Need Help Interpreting Igenex Results

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Need Help Interpreting Igenex Results
Monica922
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 13496

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Monica922     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Three Cases:
Case 1: Lyme IGM positive (28,30,31,66)
Indeter (34,39, 41, 83-93)
Lyme IGG positive (31) Inderm(41)

Case 2: Lyme IGM pos(34,41,66) Indeter(31,39, 83-93)
Lyme IGG pos (23-25) *three +++ here
Indet(34,41,83-93)

Case 3: Lyme Igm positive(30) Indeter(39,41,83-93)
Lyme IGG positive ++(41) Indetet(31)

So what do you think about these three cases? Thanks for the help.

Posts: 422 | From CT | Registered: Oct 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
METALLlC BLUE
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 6628

Icon 1 posted      Profile for METALLlC BLUE     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
All three have Lyme.

--------------------
I am not a physician, so do your own research to confirm any ideas given and then speak with a health care provider you trust.

E-mail: [email protected]

Posts: 4157 | From Western Massachusetts | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
northstar
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7911

Icon 1 posted      Profile for northstar     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Due to no test being infallible,
lyme is a clinical diagnosis. This
is reflected in the Burrascano guidelines,
where there are numerous symptom and
possibility of exposure lists. No info of
this type is provided here.

Also,
no dr., even a lyme dr., would diagnose
without some differential dx investigation, and include
heart, neurological, etc., and
blood work,.

Therefore, no one can venture an opinion on what these
results might suggest without other information.


Northstar

Posts: 1331 | From hither and yonder | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Monica922
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 13496

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Monica922     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yeah I know but I wanted to know what you thought. I am quite confident in the first two cases having lyme..one of them being me [Smile] I was wondering more about case 3. There are no clinical symptoms other than seasonal sinus/allergy ones.
Posts: 422 | From CT | Registered: Oct 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sixgoofykids
Moderator
Member # 11141

Icon 1 posted      Profile for sixgoofykids   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
With case 3 having IND on such Lyme specific bands, I would do a trial run on abx, then retest. That's what we did with my daughter with a weaker test result than that.

Of course, if seasonal allergies are the only health complaint, would you really want to treat anyway? Is it really the ONLY health complaint, or are there others that the person has just grown accustomed to thinking are normal?

--------------------
sixgoofykids.blogspot.com

Posts: 13449 | From Ohio | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
northstar
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7911

Icon 1 posted      Profile for northstar     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
one of them being me [Smile]

That's funny!

Seriously, I was more concerned that
"one of them" might grab that, and
use it out of context.

I know that you
know,
but do they know? No.

Confused?
Me too
Northstar

Posts: 1331 | From hither and yonder | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I agree that case 3 is a weaker case, but it's positive on the IgG!!! Pretty important information! Too important to ignore.

I would also do a trial run of meds and test again. Bands 39 and 83-93 are VERY specific!

Each are the DNA of the borrelia burgdorferi.

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96222 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Monica922
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 13496

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Monica922     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks
Posts: 422 | From CT | Registered: Oct 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
METALLlC BLUE
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 6628

Icon 1 posted      Profile for METALLlC BLUE     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Like I said, all three have Lyme. Now the issue is whether any have co-infections. Additionally, while three may be asymptomatic (Which I highly doubt) -- they do have Lyme. The issue now is whether they have subtle symptoms that are being minimized or entirely detached from Lyme.

It's also possible they have another condition on top, but that's something I don't really feel is appropriate to assume in order to avoid treating the Lyme.

A test run of antibiotics as a therapeutic probe is a wise choice. The issue is simple, if the person was recently bitten, how do we know that if we wait to treat, just because they're presenting with few or no symptoms, that this isn't going to give the infection time to spread.

It's ultimately the person's choice, and if I were asymptomatic and I knew I had Lyme, I'd immediately see an LLMD, and I'd be evaluated, and then I'd do my own homework. Then I'd make my decision.

--------------------
I am not a physician, so do your own research to confirm any ideas given and then speak with a health care provider you trust.

E-mail: [email protected]

Posts: 4157 | From Western Massachusetts | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.