LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Activism » ? - FDA attack on nutrients/supplements again?

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: ? - FDA attack on nutrients/supplements again?
Robin123
Moderator
Member # 9197

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Robin123     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I just received an email tonight from HealthFreedomUSA.org saying that the FDA is trying to illegally limit nutrient and supplement use again.

Supposedly the latest attempt is to try to ban interstate shipment of nutrients and supplements if there have been any studies on them (huh? - sounds nuts to me).

The site said that the DSHEA (Dietary Supplement and Health Education Act of 1994) is supposed to protect nutrients and supplements and that this latest FDA draft regulation attempt is illegal.

They said we should flood the FDA with our comments saying that we expect the DSHEA to be upheld and want no attacks on the interstate shipment of nutrients and supplements. And to do so up through Novemer 25.

You can go to http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=26269 to sign the petition against any restrictions and make a comment.

And then come back here and tell us what you think about what's going on - looks real nutty to me.

If it looks like a serious threat to any of you, I'd then suggest forwarding on this url to other interested health organizations/groups ASAP.

Thx - Robin

Posts: 13116 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robin123
Moderator
Member # 9197

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Robin123     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I just got the email again today from this organization. They seem to think this is a serious threat to our access to nutrients and supplements, with a comment deadline of Nov 25. Please take a look at the site here and see what you think.

I'm surprised it hasn't had more press if it's really this bad. Maybe I'll call my nat'l rep offices tomorrow and ask them.

Posts: 13116 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robin123
Moderator
Member # 9197

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Robin123     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Ok - I found out today that this email is about the FDA attempting to draft a regulation, which is illegal under the DSHEA (Dietary Supplements Health Education Act of 1994).

The deadline to sign the petition and make comments they say is November 25, which is tomorrow.

The bigger issue, I think, is that we're going to be facing a Codex fight in 2009, in which international law will try to supercede our national laws protecting our nutrition, supplements, etc. Not good.

For this reason, I suggest that everyone go the www.healthfreedomusa.org, click on Take Action, and sign up for the mailing alerts.

The site is also a good one to read through and there are videos you can watch.

I believe this is an urgent issue, since most of us on here take supplements, and we want to be able to continue doing so, don't we?

Posts: 13116 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
NP40
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 6711

Icon 1 posted      Profile for NP40     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Robin,

This is absolutely true. The FDA has long been a shill for Big Pharma, essentially controlled by them. This process has greatly accelerated in the last few years. Supps are competition.

Codex has already been implemented in parts of Europe. They need a rx from a Doctor to get vitamin c, etc.

FDA is trying to "harmonize" our laws with there's. It's blatantly illegal here for them to do so but it doesn't stop them from trying. The last attempt by the FDA to "criminalize" supplements was stopped in it's tracks during their "public response" period.

Health Freedom is attempting to do this now as well. Over 600,000 people responded on Health Freedom's website alone last time. Need to do it again.

Posts: 1632 | From Northern Wisconsin | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.