This is topic Serious/action needed re CDC proposal to quarantine/vaccinate in forum Medical Questions at LymeNet Flash.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flash.lymenet.org/ubb/ultimatebb.php/topic/1/134833

Posted by Robin123 (Member # 9197) on :
 
http://drrimatruthreports.com/auschwitz-in-atlanta/

I just received this today - have not evaluated it - could use some help in doing so, if any of you have a little time -

This is an alert thread here - please click on the link below to the post in Activism to discuss.

If any of you can find out more about what's going on, please post the info in the Oct 5 Activism thread set up for this.

Would like to know if the consensus is that we need to alert our various networks to take some action.

http://flash.lymenet.org/scripts/ultimatebb.cgi/forum/8?

UPDATE - THIS IS FOR REAL AND WE NEED TO LET OUR NETWORKS KNOW TO SPREAD THE WORD AND RESPOND!

SEE BELOW -

[ 10-06-2016, 07:34 AM: Message edited by: Robin123 ]
 
Posted by Brussels (Member # 13480) on :
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEdiG7ObA7E

Your CDC and vaccine makers such as Merck are criminals.

I watched this new documentary about what they did to documents of studies concerning a CLEAR link between the MMR and autism,..

... and how they proceeded to first falsify documents, then after, when the situation got too hot for them, ...

...they decided to DESTROY the studies proving the connection.


People who talk in this video proving that there is corruption and false information are guys like

...Luc Montanier who received the nobel prize for the discovery of AIDS,

... an MIT senior researcher Stephanie Seneff,

... Brian Hooker (phD in environmental biology),

...and Dr. William Thompson (CDC scientist) who had all the data in his hands,

and other SCIENTISTS or medical doctors who treat the affected patients.


The thing is so serious that it makes me wonder, who can ever trust this institution ever again?

Who will EVER trust that what they say is safe is safe indeed? Like flu vaccines?

Watch this documentary and see for yourself!


One thing I definitively learned with this video is that all scientists who denounced vaccines as UNSAFE say that vaccines DO NOT GO THROUGH THOROUGH TESTING like pharmaceutical products do.

Vaccines are not considered pharmaceutical drugs. So they just do lighter studies, and get the 'safe' stamp.

Absolutely NO SINGLE LONG TERM STUDIES for any vaccine whatsoever!!

ALL VACCINES! Not a single one goes through what a pharma drug will go through.
 
Posted by Brussels (Member # 13480) on :
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOuDX7YsYHM

This documentary I posted above (Vaxxed) was pulled OUT of a festival (Tribeca Film Festival) due to controversy.

Robert DE NIRO speaks in this video in FAVOR of the documentary.


In De Niro's words:

' You must see this film!'.

' There IS a link (between autism and vaccinations)'

' I have an autistic son' and 'I want to know the truth.'
 
Posted by Robin123 (Member # 9197) on :
 
Thx, Brussels - the Vaxxed film is being shown all over CA now, with speakers for Q&A -

Many Californians are now homeschooling their kids because they don't want them to receive all those vaccinations to enter kindergarten or 7th grade, is my understanding.

The first legal challenge was turned down, now there's going to be an appeal.
 
Posted by me (Member # 45475) on :
 
I found info from three different sites after some digging:

I copied and pasted the following from:

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/08/15/2016-18103/control-of-communicable-diseases

It is a long document. Here is an excerpt

"12. § 70.18 AGREEMENTS
This proposed provision allows HHS/CDC to enter into an agreement with an individual, upon such terms as HHS/CDC considers to be reasonably necessary,

indicating that the individual agrees to any of the public health measures authorized under this part,

including quarantine, isolation, conditional release, medical examination, hospitalization, vaccination, and treatment;

provided that the individual's agreement shall not be considered as a prerequisite to the exercise of the CDC's authority under this part.

In circumstances where an individual is unable to confirm agreement, for instance a minor or an individual with a cognitive disability or other incapacity,

CDC may enter into an agreement with a parent or other appropriate guardian authorized to act on the individual's behalf.

HHS/CDC believes that the availability of agreements is an important tool to obtain an individual's compliance with public health measures and as a means of building trust with the individual.

An agreement, for instance, may be used in circumstances where an individual agrees to comply with the instructions of public health staff, such as to not engage in travel, limit social contacts, or remain in home quarantine.

An agreement will typically include a statement indicating the individual chooses to enter into the agreement on a voluntary basis,

without duress or coercion, and with full knowledge of the facts and circumstances of his/her individual case.

Individuals who decline to enter into such agreements will not face criminal or other penalties for not entering into such agreements.

However, individuals who violate the terms of the agreement or the terms of the Federal order for quarantine, isolation, or conditional release (even if no agreement is in place between the individual and the government),

he or she may be subject to criminal penalties as explained in the preamble to section 70.19.

These criminal penalties will also be explained in the text of the agreement itself. HHS/CDC specifically solicits public comment on the utility and appropriateness of using agreements as described in this preamble,

particularly regarding whether such agreements are confusing to individuals as they shall not be considered a prerequisite to the exercise of the CDC's authority under this part."


And I found this:

http://m.greenmedinfo.com/blog/cdcs-alarming-quarantinecommunicable-disease-proposal-draws-call-action-health-fr

And this:

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-08-15/html/2016-18103.htm

(breaking up the post for easier reading for many here)

[ 10-06-2016, 12:00 AM: Message edited by: Robin123 ]
 
Posted by Lymetoo (Member # 743) on :
 
Thank goodness I have refused vaccines for years now... probably about 15 yrs or more.

They push the stupid tetanus vaccine every time I end up in the hospital. They just better not ever try to force me.
 
Posted by sparkle7 (Member # 10397) on :
 
This looks pretty serious…

https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=CDC-2016-0068-0001

I didn't have time to read the whole thing but it looks like they want to have the power to force vaccines on everyone in case of a pandemic or whatever…

Comments have to be made by Oct. 14th, 2016. Not a lot of time.
 
Posted by Robin123 (Member # 9197) on :
 
Thanks, everyone, for responding, and thanks for the links - I see that greenmedinfo is included in the links - this is one of the major wholistic health sites and an indication that people are starting to get going on this issue -

Here's another page from Dr Rima - http://drrimatruthreports.com/15-days-to-save-health-freedom

She's advocating some action here - please read through everything you can manage to stomach - oy - and then start letting all your health networks - we need millions to speak up against forced quarantine, vaccinations, etc -
 
Posted by Brussels (Member # 13480) on :
 
The main MD in the Vaxxed documentary said he is absolutely NOT AGAINST vaccines.

The MD said he saw, so far, no link between INDIVIDUAL VACCINES and autism.

But the link between the MMR (triple vaccine) to autism is clear, statistically speaking, he said.


Specially for black children!! For some genetic reason, black kids are MUCH more prone to get autism after the MMR shot than other racial groups.

And BOYS have much more chance to be autistic than girls (that's what I understood and what dr. K. has been talking for long...).

If parents would like to give vaccines, try to give them INDIVIDUAL vaccines, NOT MULTIPLE VACCINES.

-----------------------------------------------

2 MDs who were vaccinating patients (children) for more than a decade read the report from the CDC studies done by Thompson (the CDC scientist), at the end of the film.

Both said something like 'I feel I was deceived by the CDC'.

The female MD said she will tell parents from then on:' Do as you wish with your own baby, but I am NOT vaccinating my baby'.

that' a pediatrician who read the studies done by the CDC (the one that was destroyed).
 
Posted by Brussels (Member # 13480) on :
 
There are ABSOLUTELY NO STUDIES by the CDC, as far as I understood through the documentary, concerning safety of TRIPLE vaccines.

Not to say about the 5 in 1 or Infantrix-HEXA vaccines (6 in 1) they are now pushing on babies!


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20481658
(Pubmed says it's safe guys!! Just jump on it and get your babies this 6 in 1 jab!!)

http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/vaccinations/pages/5-in-1-infant-dtapipvhib-vaccine.aspx
(you can also opt for the 'mild' version 5 in 1, if you feel the 6 in 1 might be a bit too much)


I suspect they want that the curve of numbers of autism go faster up.

Otherwise it will take too long to reach 1 in 2 children with autism (parents have to wait until 2032 if the tendency is like today).

So with the 6 in 1, we may reach 50% of autistic children much sooner, I suppose?

They should ask parents for a bit more of patience.

Oh, another article, of another scientist linking autism go GLYPHOSATE is more optimist: we will reach the 50% barrier on 2025, thanks to glyphosate (Round Up) according to Seneffe.


http://www.anh-usa.org/half-of-all-children-will-be-autistic-by-2025-warns-senior-research-scientist-at-mit/

That is just a few years ahead from now.

That is why this product GcMAF had been forbidden in the USA. It may help fixing part of the problem...

https://immunocentre.eu/what-is-gcmaf/
 
Posted by Brussels (Member # 13480) on :
 
Just 15 days more to take action, said the link Robin posted

Here's another page from Dr Rima

http://drrimatruthreports.com/15-days-to-save-health-freedom
 
Posted by Robin123 (Member # 9197) on :
 
https://www.regulations.gov/docketBrowser?rpp=50&so=DESC&sb=postedDate&po=100&dct=PS&D=CDC-2016-0068

This is the link to make comments on the Federal Register by Oct 14. We can make them anonymously if we want.

I scrolled through some of the comments. Would it surprise anyone to hear that comments are running 100% OPPOSED?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Go for it!!!
 
Posted by Robin123 (Member # 9197) on :
 
I suggest that everyone contact your federal reps by phone, fax, email to voice your opposition to quarantine, forced vaccinations, etc.

This will happen even if someone just has a cold or a fever on an airplane, meaning they want to take over the country like the fascists did in WWII.

And note that the CDC is doing this - the same folks who fight against Lyme and co's.

The more our reps hear from us, the stronger their sense of action is on an issue. As I said, comments on the Federal Register are running 100% opposed.

[ 10-06-2016, 10:12 PM: Message edited by: Robin123 ]
 


Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3