Your CDC and vaccine makers such as Merck are criminals.
I watched this new documentary about what they did to documents of studies concerning a CLEAR link between the MMR and autism,..
... and how they proceeded to first falsify documents, then after, when the situation got too hot for them, ...
...they decided to DESTROY the studies proving the connection.
People who talk in this video proving that there is corruption and false information are guys like
...Luc Montanier who received the nobel prize for the discovery of AIDS,
... an MIT senior researcher Stephanie Seneff,
... Brian Hooker (phD in environmental biology),
...and Dr. William Thompson (CDC scientist) who had all the data in his hands,
and other SCIENTISTS or medical doctors who treat the affected patients.
The thing is so serious that it makes me wonder, who can ever trust this institution ever again?
Who will EVER trust that what they say is safe is safe indeed? Like flu vaccines?
Watch this documentary and see for yourself!
One thing I definitively learned with this video is that all scientists who denounced vaccines as UNSAFE say that vaccines DO NOT GO THROUGH THOROUGH TESTING like pharmaceutical products do.
Vaccines are not considered pharmaceutical drugs. So they just do lighter studies, and get the 'safe' stamp.
Absolutely NO SINGLE LONG TERM STUDIES for any vaccine whatsoever!!
ALL VACCINES! Not a single one goes through what a pharma drug will go through.
Posts: 6199 | From Brussels | Registered: Oct 2007
| IP: Logged |
Brussels
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 13480
posted
Thx, Brussels - the Vaxxed film is being shown all over CA now, with speakers for Q&A -
Many Californians are now homeschooling their kids because they don't want them to receive all those vaccinations to enter kindergarten or 7th grade, is my understanding.
The first legal challenge was turned down, now there's going to be an appeal.
Posts: 13116 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
me
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 45475
posted
I found info from three different sites after some digging:
"12. § 70.18 AGREEMENTS This proposed provision allows HHS/CDC to enter into an agreement with an individual, upon such terms as HHS/CDC considers to be reasonably necessary,
indicating that the individual agrees to any of the public health measures authorized under this part,
including quarantine, isolation, conditional release, medical examination, hospitalization, vaccination, and treatment;
provided that the individual's agreement shall not be considered as a prerequisite to the exercise of the CDC's authority under this part.
In circumstances where an individual is unable to confirm agreement, for instance a minor or an individual with a cognitive disability or other incapacity,
CDC may enter into an agreement with a parent or other appropriate guardian authorized to act on the individual's behalf.
HHS/CDC believes that the availability of agreements is an important tool to obtain an individual's compliance with public health measures and as a means of building trust with the individual.
An agreement, for instance, may be used in circumstances where an individual agrees to comply with the instructions of public health staff, such as to not engage in travel, limit social contacts, or remain in home quarantine.
An agreement will typically include a statement indicating the individual chooses to enter into the agreement on a voluntary basis,
without duress or coercion, and with full knowledge of the facts and circumstances of his/her individual case.
Individuals who decline to enter into such agreements will not face criminal or other penalties for not entering into such agreements.
However, individuals who violate the terms of the agreement or the terms of the Federal order for quarantine, isolation, or conditional release (even if no agreement is in place between the individual and the government),
he or she may be subject to criminal penalties as explained in the preamble to section 70.19.
These criminal penalties will also be explained in the text of the agreement itself. HHS/CDC specifically solicits public comment on the utility and appropriateness of using agreements as described in this preamble,
particularly regarding whether such agreements are confusing to individuals as they shall not be considered a prerequisite to the exercise of the CDC's authority under this part."
-------------------- Just sharing my experiences, opinions, and what I've read and learned. Not medical advice. Posts: 1431 | From USA | Registered: Mar 2015
| IP: Logged |
I didn't have time to read the whole thing but it looks like they want to have the power to force vaccines on everyone in case of a pandemic or whatever…
Comments have to be made by Oct. 14th, 2016. Not a lot of time.
Posts: 7772 | From Northeast, again... | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Thanks, everyone, for responding, and thanks for the links - I see that greenmedinfo is included in the links - this is one of the major wholistic health sites and an indication that people are starting to get going on this issue -
She's advocating some action here - please read through everything you can manage to stomach - oy - and then start letting all your health networks - we need millions to speak up against forced quarantine, vaccinations, etc -
Posts: 13116 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
Brussels
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 13480
posted
The main MD in the Vaxxed documentary said he is absolutely NOT AGAINST vaccines.
The MD said he saw, so far, no link between INDIVIDUAL VACCINES and autism.
But the link between the MMR (triple vaccine) to autism is clear, statistically speaking, he said.
Specially for black children!! For some genetic reason, black kids are MUCH more prone to get autism after the MMR shot than other racial groups.
And BOYS have much more chance to be autistic than girls (that's what I understood and what dr. K. has been talking for long...).
If parents would like to give vaccines, try to give them INDIVIDUAL vaccines, NOT MULTIPLE VACCINES.
-----------------------------------------------
2 MDs who were vaccinating patients (children) for more than a decade read the report from the CDC studies done by Thompson (the CDC scientist), at the end of the film.
Both said something like 'I feel I was deceived by the CDC'.
The female MD said she will tell parents from then on:' Do as you wish with your own baby, but I am NOT vaccinating my baby'.
that' a pediatrician who read the studies done by the CDC (the one that was destroyed).
Posts: 6199 | From Brussels | Registered: Oct 2007
| IP: Logged |
Brussels
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 13480
posted
There are ABSOLUTELY NO STUDIES by the CDC, as far as I understood through the documentary, concerning safety of TRIPLE vaccines.
Not to say about the 5 in 1 or Infantrix-HEXA vaccines (6 in 1) they are now pushing on babies!
I suspect they want that the curve of numbers of autism go faster up.
Otherwise it will take too long to reach 1 in 2 children with autism (parents have to wait until 2032 if the tendency is like today).
So with the 6 in 1, we may reach 50% of autistic children much sooner, I suppose?
They should ask parents for a bit more of patience.
Oh, another article, of another scientist linking autism go GLYPHOSATE is more optimist: we will reach the 50% barrier on 2025, thanks to glyphosate (Round Up) according to Seneffe.
posted
I suggest that everyone contact your federal reps by phone, fax, email to voice your opposition to quarantine, forced vaccinations, etc.
This will happen even if someone just has a cold or a fever on an airplane, meaning they want to take over the country like the fascists did in WWII.
And note that the CDC is doing this - the same folks who fight against Lyme and co's.
The more our reps hear from us, the stronger their sense of action is on an issue. As I said, comments on the Federal Register are running 100% opposed.
[ 10-06-2016, 10:12 PM: Message edited by: Robin123 ]
Posts: 13116 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic