LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Letter to the editor from Dr. S

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Letter to the editor from Dr. S
lou
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 81

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lou     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
_The Daily Times - www.delmarvanow.com - Salisbury, Md._
(http://www.delmarvanow.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060911/OPINION03/609110\
321/1014)

Letters to the Editor


Diagnosing Lyme is a complex, difficult process


RE: "Lyme on the rise on Shore, but not doctors to treat it," Aug. 7; and
"Few Delmarva physicians trained to recognize Lyme," Aug. 24
Recent letters to the editor have implied physicians who don't prescribe
long-term antibiotics for suspected Lyme disease are incompetent.

Nonsense. Lyme patients rarely need prolonged antibiotics. Our data on 1,500
patients show the vast majority of post-Lyme patients have an inflammatory
illness that requires specific interventions following antibiotics -- not
antibiotics forever. Denial or diagnosis of Lyme based on a flawed diagnostic
test or no test is wrong.
We often see patients both under- and over-diagnosed using clinical
diagnosis alone.
The pathophysiology of chronic Lyme is readily demonstrated by commercially
available lab tests looking at the inflammatory basis of the illness. Be wary
of results from any lab that demands cash payments.
Practicing physicians acknowledge the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges
posed by Lyme. The tragedy of incorrect diagnosis is measured both by
disability from untreated illness and injury from over-treatment with
unnecessary
antibiotics, not to mention delay in proper diagnosis. Until recently, no tests
could show if a patient had living Lyme spirochetes. Our paper, sent last
month to the New England Journal of Medicine on use of C4a, may be a
breakthrough.
Consideration of "Lyme literacy" begins with rock-solid facts, not unfounded
assumptions from either Lyme-naysayers or Lyme-advocates. Many other
illnesses look like Lyme, but are not. Without a careful differential diagnosis
of
patients with complex, multisystem, multisymptom illness, we routinely see
nonsense diagnoses like fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue and Lyme too, when the
illness can be shown to be something else.
Mold exposure leads the list of confounding diagnoses, as demonstrated by
our three recent peer-reviewed publications.
Some practitioners assume all patients with chronic multisystem illness have
Lyme. They often prescribe intravenous antibiotics that they themselves
dispense, collecting fees often exceeding $15,000 a month. Tests used to
confirm
such "expensive Lyme" must be impeccable. Clinical diagnosis of "expensive
Lyme" must be impeccable.
I was a member of ILADS, the society of "Lyme literates" for three years,
lecturing at meetings of both ILADS and the Lyme Disease Association in Easton
from 2000 to 2002. In 2003, I quit both groups.
Throwing stones at physicians is a losing approach to thinking. Look at the
Mid-Shore Lyme Disease Association in Easton; they sponsored a national
meeting with top-drawer Lyme physicians in March 2006.
Having Lyme disease can be a terrible problem; let fact -- not emotion --
sway the approach to the patient.
Dr. Ritchie C. Shoemaker
Pocomoke City


Shoemaker is director of the Center for Research on Biotoxin Associated
Illnesses in Pocomoke City. -- Editor

Posts: 8430 | From Not available | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Surprising.

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96223 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
humanbeing
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8572

Icon 1 posted      Profile for humanbeing     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Our data on 1,500 patients show the vast majority of post-Lyme patients have an inflammatory illness that requires specific interventions following antibiotics

What is the name of the study? What is the "specific intervention"?


The pathophysiology of chronic Lyme is readily demonstrated by commercially available lab tests looking at the inflammatory basis of the llness.

Two commercial labs tested negative for me, what is an inflammatory terst? My sed rates were fine...

Be wary of results from any lab that demands cash payments .

I'm more wary of the labs that are free but wrong.

Who is this man? And can he really be from ILADS?

--------------------
We are spiritual beings on a human journey...

www.ruggierogallery.com

Posts: 906 | From CT | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lyme Wolf
Member
Member # 5463

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lyme Wolf     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hmmm...let's see....

"Shoemaker is director of the Center for Research on Biotoxin Associated Illnesses in Pocomoke City. -- Editor" which is a noble "not-for-profit research center". But, imagine the luck, SHARES the same address as ChronicNeurotoxins, Inc., a for profit company (not anything wrong with that per se). Except that dear Ritchie is criticizing others for "cashing in" on providing treatment to patients.


Ritchie is promoting mold exposure and other "biotoxins" as the "mysterious underlying cause of the post Lyme inflammatory process"...and coincidentally his "Center" can treat you for it! Ding. Ding.

Alas..he is no longer a member of ILADS.

As usual, "Steere clear". We have another "Bum Steere".


Keep on, keepin' on...

-Lyme Wolf

Posts: 63 | From Twin Cities, MN | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bettyg
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
for other folks who can't comprehend/read how this one copied to our board....Bettyg [Big Grin]

quote:
Originally posted by lou:
The Daily Times - www.delmarvanow.com - Salisbury, Md._
(http://www.delmarvanow.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060911/OPINION03/609110\
321/1014)

Letters to the Editor


Diagnosing Lyme is a complex, difficult process


RE: "Lyme on the rise on Shore, but not doctors to treat it," Aug. 7; and "Few Delmarva physicians trained to recognize Lyme," Aug. 24

Recent letters to the editor have implied physicians who don't prescribe long-term antibiotics for suspected Lyme disease are incompetent.


Nonsense. Lyme patients rarely need prolonged antibiotics .


Our data on 1,500 patients show the vast majority of post-Lyme patients have an inflammatory illness that requires specific interventions following antibiotics -- not antibiotics forever.

Denial or diagnosis of Lyme based on a flawed diagnostic test or no test is wrong.

We often see patients both under- and over-diagnosed using clinical diagnosis alone.

The pathophysiology of chronic Lyme is readily demonstrated by commercially available lab tests looking at the inflammatory basis of the illness.

Be wary of results from any lab that demands cash payments.

Practicing physicians acknowledge the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges posed by Lyme.

The tragedy of incorrect diagnosis is measured both by disability from untreated illness and injury from over-treatment with unnecessary
antibiotics, not to mention delay in proper diagnosis.


Until recently, no tests could show if a patient had living Lyme spirochetes .


Our paper, sent last month to the New England Journal of Medicine on use of C4a, may be a breakthrough.


Consideration of "Lyme literacy" begins with rock-solid facts, not unfounded assumptions from either Lyme-naysayers or Lyme-advocates.

Many other illnesses look like Lyme, but are not.

Without a careful differential diagnosis of patients with complex, multisystem, multisymptom illness, we routinely see nonsense diagnoses like fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue and Lyme too, when the illness can be shown to be something else.


Mold exposure leads the list of confounding diagnoses, as demonstrated by our three recent peer-reviewed publications .


Some practitioners assume all patients with chronic multisystem illness have Lyme.

They often prescribe intravenous antibiotics that they themselves dispense, collecting fees often exceeding $15,000 a month. Tests used to
confirm such "expensive Lyme" must be impeccable.

Clinical diagnosis of "expensive Lyme" must be impeccable.


I was a member of ILADS, the society of "Lyme literates" for three years, lecturing at meetings of both ILADS and the Lyme Disease Association in Easton from 2000 to 2002. In 2003, I quit both groups .


Throwing stones at physicians is a losing approach to thinking. Look at the Mid-Shore Lyme Disease Association in Easton; they sponsored a national meeting with top-drawer Lyme physicians in March 2006.

Having Lyme disease can be a terrible problem; let fact -- not emotion -- sway the approach to the patient.

Dr. Ritchie C. Shoemaker
Pocomoke City

Shoemaker is director of the Center for Research on Biotoxin Associated Illnesses in Pocomoke City. -- Editor

I just started reading Dr. S's MOLD WARRIORS book, 2005, last night after reading about it here on the board for at least 1 yr. It was loaned to our city library from Santa Barbara, Calif. Thru our sources available, only 15 public libraries have Ritchie's book.

He found he had huge MOLD ALLERGIES as well so became an expert in this field many years ago.
Bettyg [Big Grin]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
klutzo
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 5701

Icon 1 posted      Profile for klutzo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
My holistic doctor had never heard of Dr. Shoemaker, but nevertheless kept telling me my Lyme was gone, but I had major mold and yeast problems. He used AK to determine this.

So, I insisted on another Bowen, and though my serial dilution had gone down from 1:128 to 1:32, that is still plenty of Lyme. Of course, I guess Dr. S would say that is a lab that requires cash, therefore worthless.

I have read "Mold Warriors". My confusion comes from the fact that I aced his Visual contrast test for neurotoxins, yet I have documented brain damage that is rated severe, and two positive Lyme tests. In addition, I have major neuro-herxing sx. Somebody has to be wrong here.

I understand his questioning of long-term ABX. There are problems from it, as we all know. I don't understand his antagonistic attitude towards the very people he depends upon for his (very nice) living.

Klutzo

Posts: 1269 | From Clearwater, Florida, USA | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
treepatrol
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 4117

Icon 1 posted      Profile for treepatrol     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I just emailed Lyme Docs at aol ILADS the artical.

I feel like hes just another traitor [cussing] [loco] [bonk]

--------------------
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
Remember Iam not a Doctor Just someone struggling like you with Tick Borne Diseases.

Newbie Links

Posts: 10564 | From PA Where the Creeks are Red | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Larkspur
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 5131

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Larkspur     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Very suprising for me too. I wish all these folks could work together.
I got exposed to mold about a year 1/2 ago, so my LLMD (ILADS member) put me on his cholestyramine/actos protocol; in me it turned on an inflammatory response that caused my leptin resistance to become much much worse as well as develop parasthsias in my feet (I'm convinced it was the CSM protocol)
Thanks Ritchie!

--------------------
"We must be willing to get rid of
the life we've planned, so as to have the life that is waiting for us" - e.m. forster

Posts: 921 | From PA | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dontlikeliver
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 4749

Icon 1 posted      Profile for dontlikeliver     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Very interesting.
Posts: 2824 | From The Back of Beyond | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sometimesdilly
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 9982

Icon 1 posted      Profile for sometimesdilly     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hmm.

I wonder what Dr. Shoemaker has to say about those of us who were "lucky" enough to have a bull eye, all the lyme symptoms in the book, live in a properly endemic area, etc- so rather DEFINITELY have lyme even if an ELISA was neg, and thus receive the standard radically insuffiencent lyme treatment, and hmm, STILL HAVE LYME 4 YEARS AND LOTS LONGER THAN THAT LATER?

Yes, I sure would call any doctor not willing to treat me with long term abx incompetent or ignorant at best, and a coward at worst (along the lines of my PC duck who after every test known to mankind said to me, i don't have a clue what you have, but I KNOW it is not lyme,

And after she had not one but 2 LLMD's let her know HEY YOU IDIOT, THIS LADY HAS LYME!!! her response was that lyme tests were too controversial, and she just couldn't possibly have anything to do with any part of my treatment.

Hmm. I think i'm going way off topic here. Actually, I think i'm.... RANTING. Nevermind. Sorry. Won't happen again...

[bonk] Dilly

Posts: 2507 | From lost in the maze | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TerryK
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 8552

Icon 1 posted      Profile for TerryK     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
One LLMD (a member of ILADS) told me that he doesn't believe in much of Shoemaker's theories but he does think that the neurotoxin protocol can be helpful for lyme patients.

Terry

Posts: 6286 | From Oregon | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dontlikeliver
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 4749

Icon 1 posted      Profile for dontlikeliver     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
We've already got a Camp A and Camp B, we certainly don't need a Camp C (mold-camp) also I don't think. The fighting is bad enough as it is already.
Posts: 2824 | From The Back of Beyond | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
PinchotGail
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 5066

Icon 1 posted      Profile for PinchotGail   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Ditto, what you said Klutzo, Cave and Lyme Wolfe......good points!!! [Big Grin]

Gail

 -

--------------------
Strength does not come from physical capacity. It comes from an
indomitable will ~ Gandhi

Posts: 562 | From Wellsville, PA, USA | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Michelle M
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7200

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Michelle M   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I can understand him believing that mold is a problem for some people. Maybe that's even the problem instead of lyme for some people. However, he's painting the entire lyme community, AND lyme doctors, with a mighy big brush.

What I'd like to know is, can he READ???

Without even being a glorified doctor, I have personally read dozens and dozens of research articles documenting the persistence of borrelia burgdorferi following antibiotic treatment.

We are talking multiple rounds of treatment. Not just speculating here, or going on anecdotal evidence, but getting Bb in cultures, biopsies, and such. NOT just talking about the person still testing positive following treatment, we're talking about the freaking bug is still there. Undaunted. Possibly having tea.

But wait.

We're supposed to believe, all of a sudden, that none of this is actually true. All of these documented studies are horsefeathers! We've been fleeced. Our LLMD's are ripping us off; all the borrelia are dead ALREADY, fer cryin out loud --!!! Don't believe those studies!!! Believe ME!
BUY MY STUFF!!!

I'd like to see more of this "study." Probably it consisted of people who didn't have lyme to begin with, or weren't sure WHAT they had.

Mold exposure is a real problem and I don't mean to seem to minimize it. But to basically say that chronic lyme disease doesn't exist at all, and that all LLMD's are simply out to bilk us robs him of all credibility.

I used to find his writings of great interest. I am sad to have to relegate him to the 'tunnel vision' heap and weigh his opinions accordingly.

Michelle

Posts: 3193 | From Northern California | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Nebula2005
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8244

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Nebula2005     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
My latest "LLMD" (and soon to be ex-)fancy-shmancy and outrageously expensive "research physician" prescribed cholestyramine and Welchol for me to take to clear the "biotoxins".

I have never felt this bad in the 17 or so years since THE bite!!!

After giving the world one of the greatest gifts of modern times, the Theory of Relativity, Einstein spent the rest of his life looking for a "unifying theory".

Dr. Shoemaker's theories are based on some very good science. But he's stuck on proving HIS unifying theory, that is, any illness can be blamed on exposure to and inability to clear biotoxins.

He must be very frustrated that the ILADS won't jump in and agree with him.

Oh, the stubborness of the medical mind. Impossible for any of them to get out of their own clever and well-defended boxes.

It's hard not to lose hope.

Posts: 353 | From Florida boonies | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
seibertneurolyme
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 6416

Icon 1 posted      Profile for seibertneurolyme     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Has anyone done the C4a test which Dr Sh says will prove if you still have an active Lyme infection?

Bea Seibert

Posts: 7306 | From Martinsville,VA,USA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
SForsgren
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7686

Icon 1 posted      Profile for SForsgren         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I've done it and was on the high side of the normal range. Though I don't like the recent comments that were made and do find Dr. S to be rather arrogant, I do think that his work serves a purpose and that mold and biotoxins are often overlooked by people with Lyme disease and should be considered much more fully.

--------------------
Be well,
Scott

Posts: 4617 | From San Jose, CA | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
johnlyme1
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7343

Icon 1 posted      Profile for johnlyme1     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The thing that I see over and over again that really distubs me is how they generalize and simplify this disease into a "Lyme" only problem. What about co-infection complictions! Yes, if a person has only lyme, it might be easier to get rid of. They forget that once one has been bitten by a tic, what is the licklyhood that it only has lyme in it - how foolish. If one was to truely to compile the data of co-infection involement, even against CDC criteria for lyme, and see how many had co-infections involovement, the stats would be stagering I would think.
Posts: 582 | From milwaukee wi | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
SForsgren
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7686

Icon 1 posted      Profile for SForsgren         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Amen John. I have been saying that for some time.

http://www.publichealthalert.org/2nd%20issue%20master%20eps%20ready%20for%20printer.pdf#page=6

--------------------
Be well,
Scott

Posts: 4617 | From San Jose, CA | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
NP40
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 6711

Icon 1 posted      Profile for NP40     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Agreed on the co-infection retort. Problem ? Go ask a nurse or Doc in your local ER what babesia is and I'll bet 60% can't answer it.
Posts: 1632 | From Northern Wisconsin | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lou
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 81

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lou     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
My guess would be more like 1% would know what babesia is. And that would be for lyme endemic states too.
Posts: 8430 | From Not available | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
CSTPA
Member
Member # 10112

Icon 1 posted      Profile for CSTPA     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Dr S doe snot mention in his letter to the editor that he requires a visa card payment inorder to take his online vison test from his website, which my doc had be do before and after questran.

I guess we should not trust his test since we have to pay cash up front

C.S.T.

Posts: 23 | From northeast | Registered: Sep 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Truthfinder
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 8512

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Truthfinder     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
VERY GOOD POINT, C.S.T. (Although he was careful to specify ``labs'' that require cash payments.)

Dr. S. may have been forced to change his viewpoint because his ``clinical studies'' weren't showing the glowing results he wanted them to.

I can only cite one case that I am aware of that I read about last year.

One really ill woman traveled 4,000 miles to see Dr. S. He gave her hope. He found all kinds of things wrong with her, including Lyme. He put her on his protocol. She did well in the beginning, but then began to have problems, and then started feeling worse again.

When it became evident that she was not doing well on Dr. S's protocol, he stopped making contact with her and then quit returning her phone calls. Essentially, he fired her as a patient without even the courtesy to tell her so.

So, when I read about his ``data on 1,500 patients'', I have to wonder exactly WHO gets included in his ``study''. Everybody, or just those who can prove his theories?

Dr. S. may be a brilliant guy. But like Allen Steere, I suspect that finding the truth is far less important than promoting his current beliefs.

And thanks for making this article readable, Betty!

Tracy

--------------------
Tracy
.... Prayers for the Lyme Community - every day at 6 p.m. Pacific Time and 9 p.m. Eastern Time � just take a few moments to say a prayer wherever you are�.

Posts: 2966 | From Colorado | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dontlikeliver
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 4749

Icon 1 posted      Profile for dontlikeliver     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It's sad how some people seem to 'mold' (no pun intended) the picture to fit their agenda, which it seems is what he's done also from reading the above.
Posts: 2824 | From The Back of Beyond | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dontlikeliver
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 4749

Icon 1 posted      Profile for dontlikeliver     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Oops posted to wrong thread
Posts: 2824 | From The Back of Beyond | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
riversinger
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 4851

Icon 1 posted      Profile for riversinger   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
While I agree that Dr. S's letter to the editor is greatly lacking in tact, I think it is a shame to throw out what is useful about his work.

Two local doctor's offices are finding many long term patients are responding very nicely to Dr. S's complete protocol. Not everyone, but a nice size group. I am currently collecting data to help see who most benefits. Some of this data will be sent to Dr. S, to support his theories, or not.

It is a shame that there is intolerance happening on both sides of this divide, because each has necessary and useful information to provide.

FWIW, I have been having regular C4a tests done for the last year. It seems to correlate somewhat with my CD-57 tests. My last test was 27,100, with a normal range of <700. My CD-57 is below normal. According to Dr. S, this would indicate ongoing infection, especially in the presence of my other labs that he uses, and my HLA type.

I have responded well to CSM and Actos, but with an active infection, I have an ongoing, endless supply of new neurotoxins. Obviously, for me, both treatments are necessary. With only abx, I was on a fast downhill slide. Without it, things also get worse. I wish the two sides could get together and talk!!

Dr. S's protocol is fairly complex, and requires regular labwork to correct course. Many ofthe doctors who have tried it do not understand the whole treatment, so often have no luck with patients. I'm sure Dr. S himself has patients that don't do well. He hasn't got all the answers, that's for sure. But for those who can benefit, don't discount the possibilty this could be of help to you.

--------------------
Sonoma County Lyme Support
[email protected]

Posts: 2142 | From California | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ann-OH
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 2020

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ann-OH     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I have known about Dr. S. for a long time, communicated with him, read his books, even advertised for him when he wanted people for a study.

Can't say this letter surprised me a lot.

But I have to say, he lost my confidence in whatever he wanted to communicate at "Nonsense."

Any doctor who says "Nonsense" is betraying a flaw, I feel.

Ann - OH

--------------------
www.ldbullseye.com

Posts: 5705 | From Ohio | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Areneli
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 6740

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Areneli     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Please note that Dr. S is not the inventor of this treatment. He is barely a propagator of the idea.

Cholestyramine has helped me a lot in my fight.
But I used it as any other drug; without the magic rituals Dr. S advice.
Just took 3 sachets per day and this did the job.


I am pretty much disappointed by his letter and guess that he was removed from ILADS for a good reason.

Posts: 1538 | From Planet Earth | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
SForsgren
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7686

Icon 1 posted      Profile for SForsgren         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I agree with riversinger. I have to say that too many of us focus on just Lyme and do not consider the many other things that may be part of the total body burden. Mold is something I had never thought about until reading about and meeting Dr. S. at a conference. When I investigated further, I did find issues with mold, genetics, etc. that have led me to slightly adjust my course of investigation/treatment. In person, I didn't find him to be the nicest person, but I do think that some of his work has practical application. In fact, I just finished writing about the VCS test as a measure of biotoxins in the body. That will be published in the November edition of the Public Health Alert.

I was also disappointed with the letter that Dr. S. wrote, but I would not want to miss any potential beneficial information that may exist simply as a result of a poorly worded letter. If you have not read Mold Warriors, I do recommend it and also I would recommend only making judgements about his theories after you fully understand them. They have a place even if they are not the final answer.

--------------------
Be well,
Scott

Posts: 4617 | From San Jose, CA | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Marnie
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 773

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Marnie     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Turncoat?

Pursuaded to join the others?

Like I've said...the TRUTHS are NOT going to come from THIS COUNTRY:

Curr Microbiol. 2006 Mar 9;

Lyme Disease Associated with Alzheimer's Disease.

Meer-Scherrer L, Chang Loa C, Adelson ME, Mordechai E, Lobrinus JA, Fallon BA, Tilton RC.

Laurence Meer-Scherrer, 37 Flammat, Aumatt,

Switzerland.

This case report discusses a patient with co-occurring neuroborreliosis and Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Although no claim is made for causality nor is there objective evidence that spirochetes are involved in AD, co-infection may exacerbate the symptoms of either neuroborreliosis or AD. Much is to be learned about the role of spirochetes in degenerative central nervous system disease.

PMID: 16528463

Much is to be learned? Who are they kidding? We're not stupid! It might take us awhile to catch on, but TGFTI.

C4A is an active/acute lyme marker...( goes UP)

Duhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

I will post more about this particular enzyme when my computer is "unfrozen".

Active infection.

[ 21. September 2006, 06:00 PM: Message edited by: Marnie ]

Posts: 9426 | From Sunshine State | Registered: Mar 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymeindunkirk
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7118

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymeindunkirk     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Maybe this doctor has Lyme and doesn't realize it. Maybe it is the cause of his present writings. Wouldn't that be ironic.
Posts: 547 | From Maryland | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
MagicAcorn
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 8786

Icon 1 posted      Profile for MagicAcorn     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
nonsense diagnoses like fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue and Lyme too,

Quack Quack Quack Quack Quack Quack Quack!

--------------------
 -

Posts: 1279 | From In hiding | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Truthfinder
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 8512

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Truthfinder     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Scott is probably right - we shouldn't necessarily throw the baby out with the bathwater.

But do any of us know anyone who has gotten well with Dr. S's "post-Lyme (post-abx) specific interventions"?

quote:
Our data on 1,500 patients show the vast majority of post-Lyme patients have an nflammatory illness that requires specific interventions following antibiotics -- not antibiotics forever.
I'm just not sure I trust the ethics of how his "data" is gathered.

And by the way, if he doesn't believe in long term abx, WHY do we need to protect him by calling him "Dr. S."?

Tracy

--------------------
Tracy
.... Prayers for the Lyme Community - every day at 6 p.m. Pacific Time and 9 p.m. Eastern Time � just take a few moments to say a prayer wherever you are�.

Posts: 2966 | From Colorado | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
treepatrol
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 4117

Icon 1 posted      Profile for treepatrol     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
He not only betray's us but himself also.


When you betray somebody else, you also betray yourself.
Isaac Bashevis Singer

--------------------
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
Remember Iam not a Doctor Just someone struggling like you with Tick Borne Diseases.

Newbie Links

Posts: 10564 | From PA Where the Creeks are Red | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.