posted
The problem I see with this is getting a spinal tap. A lot more of a procedure than blood testing.
Posts: 8430 | From Not available | Registered: Oct 2000
| IP: Logged |
Camp Other
Unregistered
posted
I wrote about this in my blog and posted comments on it. I think it would be good to have a confirmatory study, just to know if it can be reproduced.
At the same time, the more I think about it, why do we need a CSF test? If we have a history of tick bite, clinical signs of Lyme disease and coinfections, and serology does show evidence of infection - then why do a lumbar puncture? Lumbar punctures are higher risk than regular blood tests.
It also seems as if the argument is to use the protein profile to support the hypothesis that a pathogen triggered the illness they are calling Post-Lyme Disease Syndrome - it's not about current infection.
IP: Logged |
Camp Other
Unregistered
posted
Actually, what would happen if they compared the protein in CSF with someone with acute Lyme disease and "nPLDS"? That would be interesting...
IP: Logged |
posted
It is still nice to see good work being done and not just the acceptance that the IDSA has it all figured out.
When all these Lyme Vaccines get to market it'll be interesting to see how they market it. Why take a new vaccine when the worst that could happen is you have to take 2 weeks of Doxycycline?
Posts: 410 | From Victoria BC, Canada | Registered: Jul 2008
| IP: Logged |
Camp Other
Unregistered
posted
onbam,
I haven't been able to get your file to play. Can you summarize what is being said about Matrix Metalloproteinases?
IP: Logged |
Camp Other
Unregistered
posted
Is there somewhere else to get the linked-to material, if not the above link?
IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/