If so, hubby tried 3 or 4 treatments back in 2002 before he had done any antibiotics for lyme.
He defintely had herx reactions. The ACAM doc who did this also did IV hydrogen peroxide treatments on the same day.
In my opinion this treatment could be helpful for viral issues and possibly bartonella. But I think it has little effect on lyme or babesia. That is just my opinion.
Can be very expensive. One doc charged $125 I think per treatment and the 2nd doc charged at least $500 per treatment (think it was more but can't remember exactly).
It would qalso be helpful in comparing prices to know how many times the blood is passed under the UVB light -- some docs only do it once and others do it at least twice.
Bea Seibert
Posts: 7306 | From Martinsville,VA,USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
tick battler
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 21113
posted
Thanks Bea - yes, I think that's what it is. She first told me she was getting UV light treatments...then I asked for more detail and she explained what it was.
Why do you think it may hit bart and not lyme and babs?
I will try to find out more detail on cost.
Thanks,
tickbattler
Posts: 1763 | From Malvern, PA | Registered: Jul 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
In my opinion it is not going to work on anything intracellular. Just whatever is floating freely in the blood.
I think there was a PubMed article posted on LymeNet several years ago by a member called LymeScience that actually showed some clinical research which proved that UVB would not kill lyme.
If I get a chance I will try to find that article.
I do remember that hubby checked with insurance and at that time they would only cover this treatment for 2 conditions I think -- one was organ transplant and possible rejection and the 2nd was for heart infections such as endocarditis (which can be caused by bartonella in some cases).
Bea Seibert
Posts: 7306 | From Martinsville,VA,USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- Lyme, Babs, Fry Bug..... Whatever it is, may a treatment be discovered to make us all whole again! Posts: 941 | From AZ-MT | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Babs is intracellular -- inside the red blood cells. That is why I don't think the UVB (ultraviolet light) would work. I don't think the light can penetrate the cells to kill the babs.
Bea Seibert
Posts: 7306 | From Martinsville,VA,USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Don't see how this could work for a disease that is primarily in tissue and organ.
Posts: 8430 | From Not available | Registered: Oct 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Its too bad our whole bodies can't be irradiated as is done in the food industry. Of course we'd be killed by it. Irradiation definately kills bacteria though. No ifs and or buts about that technology.
Posts: 152 | From West Palm Bech, FL | Registered: May 2008
| IP: Logged |
CD57
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 11749
posted
what about ozone, that might have a better chance of killing stuff intracellularly?
Posts: 3528 | From US | Registered: Apr 2007
| IP: Logged |
CD57
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 11749
posted
some papers say that it is helpful because it creates a "vaccine" of sorts......little corpses of dead bugs (ie would probably catch some lyme and others) in the blood; same concept.
Posts: 3528 | From US | Registered: Apr 2007
| IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic