LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Does transmission really take >36 hours?

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Does transmission really take >36 hours?
emiller
Member
Member # 32305

Icon 1 posted      Profile for emiller     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi,

I have had Lyme for 14 years but was just diagnosed 2 months ago and have begun treatment. It's been a hellish road for me as I'm sure it has for all of you...

Anyway, my sister just found a black-legged (deer) tick embedded on my 2 year old nephew's face this morning, and she's sure it wasn't there when she put him to bed. I am weary to believe anything I've been told about LD from most doctors and other sites, so I figured this would be the right place to get a good answer. Is it at all possible that transmission could occur from having a tick embedded for at most 10 hours? I may be overreacting but I am terrified for him.

Thank you.

Posts: 15 | From Manchester, NH | Registered: Jun 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
"Is it at all possible that transmission could occur from having a tick embedded for at most 10 hours?"

ABSOLUTELY!!!!

Like, who puts a timer on the tick??? I know of someone who is certain she was infected within three hours of the bite. And I believe I've heard even shorter time periods.

His pedi will likely do nothing unless she raises a fit.

Tell her to be SURE to get photos if a rash appears. And... early testing will show negative.

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96222 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
17hens
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 23747

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 17hens     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
My good friend got it from a wood tick that had been on her 10 minutes max.

My neighbor got it from a deer tick on her no more than 20 minutes.

Both had bull's eyes in exact same spot they flicked the ticks off (notice they didn't have to pull as the ticks were not imbedded yet) and symptoms a few days later.

--------------------
"My flesh and my heart may fail, but God is the strength of my heart and my portion forever." Psalms 73:26

bit 4/09, diagnosed 1/10

Posts: 3043 | From PA | Registered: Dec 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
James1979
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I got mine illness in less than 8-10 hours.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
emiller
Member
Member # 32305

Icon 1 posted      Profile for emiller     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks so much for responding. She said she wasn't going to worry about it given what she had read, but now I have some info for her.

"Like, who puts a timer on the tick???" haha, yeah I thought it was suspect. Thanks for the advice about getting photos too.

Take care all.

[ 10-04-2011, 07:09 PM: Message edited by: emiller ]

Posts: 15 | From Manchester, NH | Registered: Jun 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Sammi
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 110

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Sammi     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The tick that bit me was attached for three hours at the most, and it transmitted five diseases. I believe attachment time is irrelevant.
Posts: 4681 | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
emiller
Member
Member # 32305

Icon 1 posted      Profile for emiller     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yikes! Sammi that's awful.

I'm so glad that this site exists. It's frightening that this is the first hit I got on a google search:

"Even if a tick is attached, it must have taken a blood meal to transmit Lyme disease. At least 36 to 48 hours of feeding is required for a tick to have fed and then transmit the bacterium that causes Lyme disease."

Posts: 15 | From Manchester, NH | Registered: Jun 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sixgoofykids
Moderator
Member # 11141

Icon 1 posted      Profile for sixgoofykids   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Mine was embedded for less than six hours.

--------------------
sixgoofykids.blogspot.com

Posts: 13449 | From Ohio | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
t9im
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 25489

Icon 1 posted      Profile for t9im   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This is part of the controversy.

All I know was it was less than 24 hrs for my daugher and the tick was not engorged when we removed it. Maybe we didn't remove it properly and while she never developed the EM rash the flu like symptoms developed in about 3 weeks.

The IDSA indicates 36 plus hours and then references 4 rodent studies (2 mice, 1 rabit, 1 hampsters).

If you read the studies:

In the lead mice study by Piesman 1 in 14 developed Lyme with ticks on for 24 hours (7% chance), 5 in 14 at 48 and 13 of 14 at 72 or when the tick dropped off when done with feeding.

The 2nd mice study had 0 of 8 at 24 hours (I forget the rest.

The rabbit and gerbel all had infections under 24 hours.

Dr. Jones discusses a case where the child became infected in less than 1 hour.

Here is a spirochete study where the LB does take time to penetrate the tick midgut wall.

http://spirochetesunwound.blogspot.com/2010/02/lyme-disease-spirochete-has-flagella.html

--------------------
Tim

Posts: 1111 | From Glastonbury, CT | Registered: Apr 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
t9im
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 25489

Icon 1 posted      Profile for t9im   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
One thing though the quicker you remove the tick the better your odds.

Not all ticks have Lyme but Dr. Sapi's work in CT indicates the ticks down here 82% of the time have something (Lyme, Bart, Babs, Erlichosis, etc.) Some of these can pass quicker than others from the tick.

There is a LLMD in NH who treats children.

--------------------
Tim

Posts: 1111 | From Glastonbury, CT | Registered: Apr 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robin123
Moderator
Member # 9197

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Robin123     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The issue is whether there's spirochetes in the tick's saliva. Judging by the stories here, YES!!!

I hope your sister is either aware of an LLMD or you're getting Lyme-literate doctor referrals for the child. Preventive treatment will save a life of misery.

Posts: 13116 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Sammi
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 110

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Sammi     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
emiller, I think it would be a good idea for your nephew to be evaluated by a knowledgeable doctor as a precaution.
Posts: 4681 | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robin123
Moderator
Member # 9197

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Robin123     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
[QUOTE]Originally posted by 17hens:
[QB]

Both had bull's eyes in exact same spot they flicked the ticks off (notice they didn't have to pull as the ticks were not imbedded yet) and symptoms a few days later.

..................................................

That's interesting - I thought they had to bite in order to transmit. So what's going on? Did a non-embedded tick bite or not?

Posts: 13116 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
17hens
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 23747

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 17hens     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I was surprised when I heard it too. They must have been biting, just not with their heads buried into the skin yet, I suppose.

--------------------
"My flesh and my heart may fail, but God is the strength of my heart and my portion forever." Psalms 73:26

bit 4/09, diagnosed 1/10

Posts: 3043 | From PA | Registered: Dec 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
emiller
Member
Member # 32305

Icon 1 posted      Profile for emiller     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks again for all the posts. I really appreciate the input. I have sent her the link for this thread, and started a new one asking for names of LLMD's in her area. She is going to bring him to his pediatrician whom she trusts and has warned her many times about the dangers of Lyme in their area. It sounds as though he is trustworthy, but I am still worried. I will send her info on LLMD's as I get responses (already got one) and told her if she has any questions or concerns or if any unusual symptoms emerge to post here or talk to me.
Posts: 15 | From Manchester, NH | Registered: Jun 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robin123
Moderator
Member # 9197

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Robin123     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Would the pediatrician be willing to consult with a Lyme-treating doctor who treats kids? Now is the window of time for adequate treatment to occur.
Posts: 13116 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
nonna05
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 33557

Icon 1 posted      Profile for nonna05     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Oh, for GOD"S sake . Get him treated ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [bow] [bow] [tsk] [tsk]

A few days on Doxy now, instead of even the most remote chance of him having to go through any of this H--L....I pray your sister just does it ... It could have a huge affect for the rest of his life. Please God move on this woman's heart NOW. Maybe with kids they use Amox or Ampic. But either way, we are talking HUGE consequences [puke] [Eek!] [Razz] Nonna

Posts: 2563 | From Denver,CO | Registered: Aug 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Razzle
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 30398

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Razzle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
IMHO, waiting for symptoms to appear is basically asking to get chronic Lyme...

--------------------
-Razzle
Lyme IgM IGeneX Pos. 18+++, 23-25+, 30++, 31+, 34++, 39 IND, 83-93 IND; IgG IGeneX Neg. 30+, 39 IND; Mayo/CDC Pos. IgM 23+, 39+; IgG Mayo/CDC Neg. band 41+; Bart. (clinical dx; Fry Labs neg. for all coinfections), sx >30 yrs.

Posts: 4166 | From WA | Registered: Feb 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
erikjh1972
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 20964

Icon 1 posted      Profile for erikjh1972     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Be PROACTIVE NOT REACTIVE. My wasnt embedded or at least didnt appear so. Couldnt have been on me for more then 7-8 hours maybe less.

--------------------
3 months Doxy
8 months of Tetra
7 months of Biaxin/Plaq.
4 months Doxy/Biaxin/Plaq.
5 months Biaxin/Plaq.
Back on Doxy/Biax/Plaq
On the road to recovery.
Trying to make people Lyme Aware.......

Posts: 289 | From R.I. | Registered: Jun 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
emiller
Member
Member # 32305

Icon 1 posted      Profile for emiller     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'm really pushing. She called her doctor's office and the nurse said if no rash and no flu-like symptoms then don't worry about it, so she wasn't going to do anything. This is exactly what my doc told me 14 years ago. I never got a rash or flu but now have chronic lyme. Since I've continued to push she said she'll take him to his pediatrician to get his opinion. I know already that he won't treat. I sent her the name and # of the LLMD I was recommended. She responded "you know he's on trial for treating children, right?" I responded that he's on trial for going against an F'ed up protocol. I really don't know what to do. She's getting mad at me for pushing; I can't force her to take him but don't think she really understands. She thinks there are dangers to treating unnecessarily, and won't hear otherwise. The dangers to not treating are pretty serious!!! I'm not going to let off her, but it also feels like overstepping boundaries. ARGHHHH!!!
Posts: 15 | From Manchester, NH | Registered: Jun 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
emiller
Member
Member # 32305

Icon 1 posted      Profile for emiller     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
My mother spoke with my sister and apparently she is more tactful. She agreed to ask her doc for antibiotics even though he is still not showing any symptoms. I'm so glad she has decided to do this. She's an amazing mom, and I know she wants whats best... it's frustrating that there is so much disinformation out there.
Posts: 15 | From Manchester, NH | Registered: Jun 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robin123
Moderator
Member # 9197

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Robin123     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Can you get her to watch Under Our Skin at www.hulu.com? It's free there. It will show her the Dr J situ too.
Posts: 13116 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
emiller
Member
Member # 32305

Icon 1 posted      Profile for emiller     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'll send her the link (and watch it myself). Thanks Robin.

[ 10-08-2011, 12:16 PM: Message edited by: emiller ]

Posts: 15 | From Manchester, NH | Registered: Jun 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Catgirl
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 31149

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Catgirl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Has anyone asked the tick?

Let's face it, all of us have lyme because of clueless doctors.

I've found that no matter how calm, or collected I am when talking to people about lyme, they generally don't listen to me because they don't have it and think I'm obsessing about it. It's that way with anything--most people can't relate, because they don't have it. However, chronic lyme is not just serious, it's unfathomable, and 99% of docs know nothing about it.

Send your sister this link at the top of the page (left hand side, under UBBFriend email this page to someone). She'll thank you for it.

--------------------
--Keep an open mind about everything. Also, remember to visit ACTIVISM (we can change things together).

Posts: 5418 | From earth | Registered: Mar 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robin123
Moderator
Member # 9197

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Robin123     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I think we need to match their thinking - ie, meet them where they're coming from, as in, do we first need to impress that this infection is REALLY different, that the closest related one is syphilis and this one is much more complex.

And use sound bites (better a sound bite than a tick bite?) - simple phrases to explain what's going on: spiral-shaped bacteria that get into the brain within 12 hours and start inflaming the nerves, that it's a nerve-inflammational illness causing all kinds of nerve-related symptoms,

that it can corkscrew into tissues anywhere and cause inflammation. I think we need to paint a simple picture of what's going on, if they're willing to listen.

I mention stats, as in a certain percentage of ticks, for instance, are infected in each area. So it's a matter of whether the tick is infected or not, but all it takes is one.

And that protection is key, and to learn about that before it happens to them and their pets.
Sometimes I get tougher on folks, saying if you don't listen now, you could end up learning the hard way, and some people die from these illnesses. Then I mention a few helpful websites.

Posts: 13116 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
nefferdun
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 20157

Icon 1 posted      Profile for nefferdun     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The wood tick was on me maybe 20 hours. I don't know how long it was crawling around before it actually bite me. I had three EM rashes indicating a lot of bacteria was transmitted. I was very sick.

It is horrible people are mislead the way they are because this disease is taking over.

--------------------
old joke: idiopathic means the patient is pathological and the the doctor is an idiot

Posts: 4676 | From western Montana | Registered: Apr 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.