Tincup
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 5829
posted
As a side note... if you do decide to test the baby again, you might want to consider a urine test (IGexeX) so as not to cause any trauma to her due to having another blood test.
posted
The problem with sxs in a 22 month old is that she's 22 months old! Both my girls had recently been on antibiotics for
their sinuses - could they have shown up seronegative as a result of under-treatment? How would I gauge sxs in my baby?
She's cranky, a poor sleeper, congested and clingy. Could be teething! Could be a virus! Could by Lyme! Ack!! She can't say
how she feels. I'm seriously driving myself nuts. My older girl - same thing. Uber cranky, short fuse, runny nose, etc.
My biggest thought is to WHY would band 41 show up AT ALL if there's no bacterial/spirochete/flagellated bacterium disease.
Did she get it (antibodies) from ME and therefore I shouldn't give it another thought? Or is there another underlying cause?
Posts: 10 | From Warrenton, VA | Registered: Jan 2012
| IP: Logged |
posted
I love Warrenton, Tincup. I searched the forum for Warrenton the other day, and I saw that you used to live out this way, correct? I'd love a PM if you know what doc to see in the area. Or Nearby areas. And for Peds Lyme, too.
Posts: 10 | From Warrenton, VA | Registered: Jan 2012
| IP: Logged |
posted
You should get your children to a LLMD (Lyme-literate doctor) a.s.a.p. and find out what really is going on.
FYI - the ELISA test is very unreliable (only about 50%).
You might want to click on "Support Groups" in the left-hand corner of the Lyement page, then your state. Contact information will come up. Maybe they can help you.
I will pm you with some information.
Posts: 9020 | From Illinois | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I insisted on Western Blot even if ELISA was negative.
Posts: 10 | From Warrenton, VA | Registered: Jan 2012
| IP: Logged |
TF
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 14183
posted
Once I found out I had lyme, I asked my lyme doc to test my husband through Igenex. (I had had lyme undiagnosed for at least 10 years. I was concerned that perhaps I had passed it to my husband through sex, etc.)
My husband had a + on band 41 and that was all. (This was through Igenex.) My now famous lyme doctor declared that he did not have lyme.
That was 8 years ago, and my husband is still in good health with no symptoms of lyme. So, evidently many things can cause a positive on band 41. That's what my lyme doctor said, and I would say that time has proven him right.
Did you know that there are quite a few strains of lyme that just cause the bulls eye rash and no other problems? Yep. It is talked about in "Cure Unknown." These strains do not make us sick at all.
So, I wonder if getting bit by a tick with one of these strains is a possible cause for a + on band 41.
I know that exposure to other illnesses can cause a plus here also. Notice that it is "exposure" that causes the +. The Western Blot cannot tell if a person has any illness at all. It can just say that the patient was exposed to particular illnesses and made antibodies to them.
I believe it is common for a person to have a + on band 41 and be perfectly healthy. Please don't let your mind run wild over this one little thing. Symptoms indicate a problem, not this particular test result.
Posts: 9931 | From Maryland | Registered: Dec 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
My concern is only because testing was done at ARUP labs, where they don't test some of the bands.
I know I'll feel better when she and my other 2 are tested at a specialty lab.
Thanks for talking me down a bit, TF and Lymetoo
I know doc are taught to treat the patient, not the numbers... I'm going to chill out now. lol.
Posts: 10 | From Warrenton, VA | Registered: Jan 2012
| IP: Logged |
TF
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 14183
posted
You can retest at Igenex or get the new lyme culture test. The culture test tries to grow lyme from your blood.
If it can, you have lyme without a doubt.
So, now you may want to think about which test you want.
By the way, Dr. J, world famous pediatric lyme specialist, will NOT treat a child with a positive lyme test unless the child has symptoms.
From what I have heard, if they don't have symptoms he says you don't want to stir things up with treatment. It can just create a problem. So, you really, really want to consider this.
Evidently, a person can be exposed to lyme (which is all the Western Blot reports--not the presence of the germ currently) or be a carrier of lyme, or other such situation. Hence the positive lyme test but no symptoms. You don't want to treat such a person because they are not ill. You don't want to make them ill.
Why not try to create a symptom list for each child and follow it over time. Then, see how you feel about it when you look at the symptom list.
Posts: 9931 | From Maryland | Registered: Dec 2007
| IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic