posted
UP
Posts: 366 | From Louisville KY. | Registered: Nov 2003
| IP: Logged |
NanaDubo
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 14794
posted
It sounds like the Zyto testing.
Posts: 1129 | From Maine | Registered: Feb 2008
| IP: Logged |
map1131
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 2022
posted
Zyto brings up many hits. It's called Zyto hand cradle. I would use this as a tool to help identify some unknown bad guys.
It's not as if blood testing is accurate and inexpensive. Looks like a trained person is reading the computer and the hits while the patient has their hand in a cradle attached to comp software helps read it.
If you've experienced a good muscle testing doc you know your body can speak out on it's wishes.
Pam
Reminds me of the QX machines that are tools to identify pathogens in your body.
-------------------- "Never, never, never, never, never give up" Winston Churchill Posts: 6478 | From Louisville, Ky | Registered: Jan 2002
| IP: Logged |
poppy
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 5355
posted
Sorta like a dowsing rod, only done long distance?
Posts: 2888 | From USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
Keebler
Honored Contributor (25K+ posts)
Member # 12673
posted
- The direct web link to the exact tool can help clarify a lot. Do you have a link?
Over the internet? Do you mean, somehow, connected through the internet? If so, NO.
I do not believe long distance will work (in my very strong opinion about about that).
This should be done in person, with someone with much experience and a RIFE machine that can scan (or similar). Still, just one tool of many.
I would prefer the assessment of a seasoned, experienced, educated LLMD or LL ND who KNOWS just by looking at and listening to a patient.
Where tests are not a guarantee, a good LL diagnostician who will use their brain, heart and instinct - coupled with experience - is the best, IMO.
If such a seasoned doctor uses other methods, that can also be helpful. But, IMO, it needs to be in person. -
[ 06-28-2012, 04:39 PM: Message edited by: Keebler ]
Posts: 48021 | From Tree House | Registered: Jul 2007
| IP: Logged |
map1131
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 2022
posted
Keebler, no this isn't long distance stuff. I've always found the long distance connection alittle to far (no pun intended)out there myself.
What I found shows a patient placing their hand in a cradle, connected to computer with a pracitioner sitting at the computer, in an office enviroment.
I'll see if I can find that site and post it here.
Looking around some more looks like some practioners are doing distant analysis????
-------------------- "Never, never, never, never, never give up" Winston Churchill Posts: 6478 | From Louisville, Ky | Registered: Jan 2002
| IP: Logged |
Razzle
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 30398
posted
The only way distance analysis works is if the practitioner has a witness (e.g., handwriting sample, hair sample, saliva sample, etc.) and uses a surrogate to test.
-------------------- -Razzle Lyme IgM IGeneX Pos. 18+++, 23-25+, 30++, 31+, 34++, 39 IND, 83-93 IND; IgG IGeneX Neg. 30+, 39 IND; Mayo/CDC Pos. IgM 23+, 39+; IgG Mayo/CDC Neg. band 41+; Bart. (clinical dx; Fry Labs neg. for all coinfections), sx >30 yrs. Posts: 4166 | From WA | Registered: Feb 2011
| IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic