LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » NEW Tick Borne Disease Discovered- Oh joy!

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: NEW Tick Borne Disease Discovered- Oh joy!
Tincup
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 5829

Icon 2 posted      Profile for Tincup         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
NBCNEWS.COM

New tick-borne virus puts the bite on Missouri farmers

The Lone Star tick, or A. americanum, shown here, may be responsible for the spread of a never-before-seen virus that hospitalized two Missouri farmers.

By JoNel Aleccia, NBC News

When two Missouri farmers wound up hospitalized with fever, fatigue, low blood cell counts and elevated liver enzymes in 2009, doctors suspected ticks were to blame.

Both men recently had reported tick bites, including a 57-year-old whose wife plucked a single critter off his abdomen with tweezers and a 67-year-old man who figured he was bitten 20 times a day for two weeks while rebuilding fences on his 40-acre farm.

"I was getting worse and worse," recalled Robert Wonderly, now 60, of Sheridan, Mo., the victim with the single bite.
The men had all the symptoms of ehrlichiosis, a potentially dangerous bacterial infection spread by, yes, ticks. But when scientists cultured samples of the farmers� blood, the bacteria were nowhere to be found.

�We placed it into the culture and then we didn�t get anything,� recalled Dr. William L. Nicholson, a research microbiologist who specializes in emerging and zoonotic infectious with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

�And that, to us, indicated that we had something else in there that we weren�t testing for.�

That something turned out to be an entirely new virus discovered only through sophisticated genetic analysis conducted by Nicholson�s colleagues at the CDC�s Viral Special Pathogens branch. The scientists reported their findings in this week's issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

�This particular virus has never been detected before,� said Nicholson. �This is unique to the world.�

So far, the Missouri men are the only known victims of the new germ, which has been identified as a phlebovirus, part of the Bunyaviridae family of potentially serious bugs.

Hantavirus, spread by deer mice, comes from that group. So does the deadly Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever.

But Nicholson, along with state and local health officials, has been scouring the region where the men were infected. They�re looking for additional signs of what has been dubbed �the Heartland virus,� after Heartland Regional Medical Center in St. Joseph, Mo., where the men were treated -- and because it was discovered in the nation�s heartland.

The new virus appears to be very rare. Although there are plenty of phleboviruses around -- more than 70 -- they are divided by the ways that they�re spread. Some are carried by sand flies, for instance. Others, like the Rift Valley fever virus, are spread by mosquitoes.

The only other tick-borne phlebovirus known to cause disease in humans is called SFTSV -- severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus -- which was recently identified in central and northeastern China.

�Even though the Chinese virus is similar, it is still quite distinct,� said Nicholson.

Researchers were able to identify the Heartland virus by using electron microscopes and next-generation genomic sequencing including total RNA analysis.

It�s not clear yet exactly how the new virus may be spread. Ticks appear to be the culprits. Nicholson and others suspect that A. americanum, the Lone Star tick found widely in northwestern Missouri and elsewhere, may be be a carrier. But other critters may be responsible as well. It�s also not clear what animals may serve as hosts, noted Dr. Scott M. Folk, the infectious disease expert at Heartland Regional who treated the two farmers.

Finding those answers will be imperative, because although the Heartland virus appears to be rare, it may not be.

�It could be responsible for more illness than we think,� Folk said.

In many ways, the new virus is just one more tick-borne problem to worry patients and doctors. The CDC lists 10 tick-borne diseases in the U.S.

The best-known is Lyme disease, which infected about 30,000 people in the U.S. in 2010.

Other infections include anaplasmosis and ehrlichiosis, which affect about 1,000 people each a year, and babesiosis, which infected about 1,100 people in the U.S. last year, the CDC said.

There's also Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, an old disease that still strikes about 2,500 people a year.

Pat Smith, president of the Lyme Disease Association Inc., believes the new virus should help bolster growing awareness of the problem of tick-borne diseases and encourage people to realize that they can be serious.

�Maybe you don�t have Lyme. Maybe you have something else,� Smith said. �They can make you sick for a long time.�

The CDC encourages people to check for ticks after they�ve been outdoors, to use insecticides to kill ticks and to monitor dogs and other animals to prevent ticks from being brought indoors.

The two Missouri men were hospitalized for nearly two weeks and took a couple months to recover. Wonderly, who also works at the local Energizer Eveready Battery Co. in nearby Maryville, says he still has problems with short-term memory, fatigue and headaches three years after the infection.

The second victim, now 70, who agreed only to be identified by his first name, Larry, said he's fine now. Neither man seemed much impressed with being infected by a never-before-seen virus, though both are glad it didn't turn out to be worse.

"I guess I never give it much thought," said Wonderly. "But I was glad they saved my life."

Link to article:
http://vitals.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/08/29/13532240-new-tick-borne-virus-puts-the-bite-on-missouri-farmers?lite

--------------------
www.TreatTheBite.com
www.DrJonesKids.org
www.MarylandLyme.org
www.LymeDoc.org

Posts: 20353 | From The Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tincup
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 5829

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Tincup         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Article says... "The two Missouri men were hospitalized for nearly two weeks and took a couple months to recover.

Wonderly, who also works at the local Energizer Eveready Battery Co. in nearby Maryville, says he still has problems with short-term memory, fatigue and headaches three years after the infection."

````````````````````````````````````````````

Bless his heart. My bet is the IDSA/CDC bed-fellows will recommend against further treatment of this new tick borne disease, claiming it is only the aches and pains of daily living. And the insurance companies will eat it up.

And the human race will become a bunch of people who have no disease, they are just written off as crazy!

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr....

--------------------
www.TreatTheBite.com
www.DrJonesKids.org
www.MarylandLyme.org
www.LymeDoc.org

Posts: 20353 | From The Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lpkayak
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 5230

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lpkayak     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
i dont understand why we are just hearing about this now when it happened 3 yrs ago...and no one else has gotten it since then?

--------------------
Lyme? Its complicated. Educate yourself.

Posts: 13712 | From new england | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'll bet plenty of people have it. Really scary, if you ask me.

(well, I DO live in MO [Wink] )

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96239 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
seibertneurolyme
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 6416

Icon 1 posted      Profile for seibertneurolyme     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well we all know there are a lot more than 10 diseases that you can get from a tick -- even in the U.S.

And of course they neglected to mention Borna virus which hubby has and is in the same family I think as the newly discovered virus. But there is no U.S. lab that tests for that anymore -- only test available is from a German lab.

These new pathogen discoveries do not make the news until they are published in a medical journal -- which is why the F lab pathogen is not more widely known outside of the lyme and other chronic illnesses communities.

Clongen lab has asked hubby to send in the 2 dog ticks which he found attached to him this spring -- they have research dollars to test the ticks for free. According to Dr Killani at the lab many tickborne diseases are transmitted when the ticks are removed -- and the time of attachment is not the only factor involved in whether transmission occurs.

Actually hope the ticks have some diseases so at least we have a paper to show the ER docs the next time hubby ends up there. But I am really hoping we are done with the ER for awhile now that the new seizure med seems to be helping. But then again the daily low grade fevers have not gone away since they started again in April.

Bea Seibert

Posts: 7306 | From Martinsville,VA,USA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Catgirl
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 31149

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Catgirl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Bea, someone emailed me about her low grade fevers (at a loss about them). She said DMSA helped (don't know why it does this though). I wonder if there is a parasite connection?

--------------------
--Keep an open mind about everything. Also, remember to visit ACTIVISM (we can change things together).

Posts: 5418 | From earth | Registered: Mar 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Keebler
Honored Contributor (25K+ posts)
Member # 12673

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Keebler     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
-
"Wonderly, who also works at the local Energizer Eveready Battery Co. in nearby Maryville, says he still has problems with short-term memory, fatigue and headaches three years after the infection."
--

If he still has symptoms, whatever infections he has should be treated but sounds like he' been dismissed.

He could have lyme, too, but likely won't get the proper evaluation or treatment. Same with other infections since they don't test for all strains.

And parasites, likely, never considered.

How many others go this "new virus" and were dismissed?

BTW, with this - or with West Nile - I hate the fact that doctors think there is no treatment for viruses. The could do IV garlic. It's been done in China for generations. Some LL NDs here order it, too.
-

Posts: 48021 | From Tree House | Registered: Jul 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
poppy
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 5355

Icon 1 posted      Profile for poppy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
They have just scratched the surface on tickborne pathogens. And mostly there are no tests and no one even looks for them. These two patients were lucky that the CDC kept looking for the cause. How often does that happen? Almost never with tickborne diseases.

If they have lingering symptoms, maybe the virus was not all they got.

Posts: 2888 | From USA | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by seibertneurolyme:
According to Dr Killani at the lab many tickborne diseases are transmitted when the ticks are removed -- and the time of attachment is not the only factor involved in whether transmission occurs.


-
I TOTALLY believe that!! I've always felt the IDSA had it wrong when they said it has to be attached "X" number of hours for transmission of disease.

And yes, I agree that "10" is a very low number. Are they covering, or are they that ignorant?

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96239 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Razzle
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 30398

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Razzle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I think the CDC is **choosing** to be that ignorant...

--------------------
-Razzle
Lyme IgM IGeneX Pos. 18+++, 23-25+, 30++, 31+, 34++, 39 IND, 83-93 IND; IgG IGeneX Neg. 30+, 39 IND; Mayo/CDC Pos. IgM 23+, 39+; IgG Mayo/CDC Neg. band 41+; Bart. (clinical dx; Fry Labs neg. for all coinfections), sx >30 yrs.

Posts: 4167 | From WA | Registered: Feb 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.