LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Co infections likely?

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Co infections likely?
nikkabelle
Member
Member # 43604

Icon 1 posted      Profile for nikkabelle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Is it likely for us with lyme to NOT have co infections, or pretty much a given we also have accompanying infections? [Frown]

--------------------
[Smile]

Posts: 81 | From Minnesota | Registered: Apr 2014  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
GretaM
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 40917

Icon 1 posted      Profile for GretaM     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
My impression from those on here, those in my support group and myself...

These days coinfections are present.

Whether they are prior infections the immune system can keep in check UNTIL lyme disables the immune system,

Whether the tick regurgitates its filthy innards into us,

Or whether we acquire them after lyme, and our immune systems are so confused it cannot fight...

Yes, coinfections are present.

Posts: 4358 | From British Columbia, Canada | Registered: Jun 2013  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
unsure445
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 15962

Icon 1 posted      Profile for unsure445     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I know about an equal number of people with lyme by itself as with coinfections.

There are many less symptoms, fatigue is usually profound, treatment is shorter and more straightforward.

A good llmd can help sort this out. I remember reading a statistic for this somewhere. It stated the percentage of ticks that carry Lyme, 1 coinfection, 2 coinfections etc…

Maybe someone else will recall the specifics.

--------------------
unsure445

Posts: 824 | From northeast | Registered: Jun 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Judie
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 38323

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Judie     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I was talking to another patient in my doctor's office. She said she got infected several years ago and just has Lyme, but people more recently infected seem to have a bunch of coinfections.

I was infected with Lyme in 2012 and 2013. I had several more coinfections the second time around (though I did have a bunch the first time). The total ones I've tested positive for are 13.

I also have babesia and bartonella, but never tested positive (I had the telltale red streaks though and other symptoms the second time around that were completely different than the first time I was infected).

This is completely anecdotal though. I know people who have been infected with the 3 Bs for several years.

Posts: 2839 | From California | Registered: Jul 2012  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TF
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 14183

Icon 1 posted      Profile for TF     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
From what lyme doctors are saying, most patients who have lyme also have babesiosis and bartonella.

Lyme docs call these "the big 3."

Burrascano said a few years ago that if a person has had lyme for at least a year, then they also have coinfections. That is the rule.

See the Guidelines, pages 3-4 where he talks about having lyme for one year and the coinfections then becoming an issue.

I have found that the more a person educates himself, generally the further back he can see lyme symptoms in his past. So, it is good to study the disease and try to estimate how long you may have had it. That helps the doctor in determining your treatment.

Posts: 9931 | From Maryland | Registered: Dec 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
desertwind
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 25256

Icon 1 posted      Profile for desertwind     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I did not begin making progress till I treated for co-infections.
Posts: 1671 | From Tick Infested New Jersey | Registered: Apr 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
nikkabelle
Member
Member # 43604

Icon 1 posted      Profile for nikkabelle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yep, that's what I thought, that they are very common.

My llmd just diagnosed me with Bart (clinically) even though my blood test was negative.

Has that happened to anyone before? Is that pretty normal?

--------------------
[Smile]

Posts: 81 | From Minnesota | Registered: Apr 2014  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
desertwind
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 25256

Icon 1 posted      Profile for desertwind     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yes, I tested negative for Babs but had all the classic symptoms. Treated for a long time and got better. Stopped tx and relapsed and there goes the merry go round. But yeah, it is very common. Good luck w/ treatment. DW
Posts: 1671 | From Tick Infested New Jersey | Registered: Apr 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Brinkley929
Member
Member # 43812

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Brinkley929     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I think that's common too!

I tested negative for Bartonella but my LLMD just clinically diagnosed me with it.

Posts: 62 | From Chicago, IL | Registered: May 2014  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.